Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 2161–2173 | Cite as

Biological response to self-etch adhesive after partial caries removal in rats

  • Adriana Fernandes Da Silva
  • Marcelo Rocha Marques
  • Wellington Luiz De Oliveira Da Rosa
  • Sandra Beatriz Chaves Tarquinio
  • Pedro Luiz Rosalen
  • Silvana Pereira Barros
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

The purposes of this study were to evaluate a model of slow caries progression and to investigate the performance of a self-etch adhesive system for partial caries removal.

Materials and methods

Rat molars were infected with Streptococcus sobrinus 6715 culture. Different time points were analyzed: days 78, 85, and 95 (± 2). After this, the samples were processed for morphological analysis. Additionally, the first molars were restored with zinc oxide and eugenol (IRM™; Dentsply; Brazil) or adhesive system (Clearfil SE Bond™; Kuraray Medical; Japan) 78 days after caries induction. After, 3 or 15 days post-treatment, the animals were euthanized, and their mandibles were processed for morphological analysis, classified by means of scores, and submitted to statistical analysis. Subsequently, immunohistochemical analysis was performed for osteonectin (OSN) and transforming growth factor-ß1 (TGF-ß1) expression.

Results

According to the caries induction model used, on day 95 greater inflammatory infiltration (p < 0.001), and more extensive degradation of secondary/primary dentin were demonstrated than on day 78 (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the restorative materials presented similar performance (p > 0.05) and proved to be fundamental to control the carious lesion. The TGF-ß1 and OSN were shown to be active during the caries process.

Conclusions

The slow caries lesion model was feasible for morphological analysis of the dentin-pulp complex. The self-etch adhesive system triggered no acute inflammatory infiltration or pulp necrosis, instead it seemed to stimulate early pulp repair.

Clinical relevance

Clearfil SE Bond™ applied directly on caries-affected dentin did not predispose to pulp inflammation; instead, it appeared to provide early biological benefits.

Keywords

Dental caries Dental materials Adhesives Rats Transforming growth factor-ß1 Osteonectin Dental pulp capping 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Luiz André Pimenta (Dental Director at Craniofacial Center, University of North Carolina at ChapelHill/USA) and Dr. Flávio Fernando Demarco (Full Professor, Federal University of Pelotas at Pelotas/Brazil) for their invaluable support in this project.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development - Brazil (CNPq, Brazil no. 141608/2004-8) and from the São Paulo State Research Foundation (FAPESP, Brazil no. 04/00276–7).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed and all procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Committee for Ethics in Animal Research (State University of Campinas – UNICAMP), according to protocol no. 625-2, which is in agreement with the Ethical Principles for Animal Research established by the Brazilian College for Animal Experimentation (COBEA).

Informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

784_2017_2303_MOESM1_ESM.docx (84 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 84 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Bjørndal L, Fransson H, Bruun G, Markvart M, Kjældgaard M, Näsman P, Hedenbjörk-Lager A, Dige I, Thordrup M (2017) Randomized clinical trials on deep carious lesions: 5-year follow-up. J Dent Res 96(7):747–753.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517702620 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ricketts D, Lamont T, Innes NPT et al (2013) Operative caries Management in Adults and Children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003808.pub3
  3. 3.
    Innes NP, Frencken JE, Bjørndal L et al (2016) Managing carious lesions: consensus recommendations on terminology. Adv Dent Res 28(2):49–57.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516639276 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schwendicke F, Frencken JE, Bjørndal L, Maltz M, Manton DJ, Ricketts D, van Landuyt K, Banerjee A, Campus G, Doméjean S, Fontana M, Leal S, Lo E, Machiulskiene V, Schulte A, Splieth C, Zandona AF, Innes NPT (2016) Managing carious lesions: consensus recommendations on carious tissue removal. Adv Dent Res 28(2):58–67.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516639271 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Maltz M, Garcia R, Jardim JJ, de Paula LM, Yamaguti PM, Moura MS, Garcia F, Nascimento C, Oliveira A, Mestrinho HD (2012) Randomized trial of partial vs. stepwise caries removal: 3-year follow-up. J Dent Res 91(11):1026–1031.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512460403 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maltz M, Jardim JJ, Mestrinho HD, Yamaguti PM, Podestá K, Moura MS, de Paula LM (2013) Partial removal of carious dentine: a multicenter randomized controlled trial and 18-month follow-up results. Caries Res 47(2):103–109.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000344013 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maltz M, Alves LS (2013) Incomplete caries removal significantly reduces the risk of pulp exposure and post-operative pulpal symptoms. J Evid Based Dent Pract 13(3):120–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2013.07.014 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maltz M, Henz SL, De Oliveira EF, Jardim JJ (2012) Conventional caries removal and sealed caries in permanent teeth: a microbiological evaluation. J Dent 40:776–782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schwendicke F, Dörfer CE, Paris S (2013) Incomplete caries removal: a systematic review and meta-analysis F. J Dent Res 92(4):306–314.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513477425 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hilton TJ, Ferracane JL, Mancl L (2013) Comparison of CaOH with MTA for direct pulp capping: a PBRN randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res 92(7_suppl):16S–22S.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513484336 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mente J, Hufnagel S, Leo M, Michel A, Gehrig H, Panagidis D, Saure D, Pfefferle T (2014) Treatment outcome of mineral trioxide aggregate or calcium hydroxide direct pulp capping: long-term results. J Endod 40(11):1746–1751.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.07.019 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kundzina R, Stangvaltaite L, Eriksen HM, Kerosuo E (2016) Capping carious exposures in adults: a randomized controlled trial investigating mineral trioxide aggregate versus calcium hydroxide. Int Endod J 50(10):924–932.  https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12719 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoefler V, Nagaoka H, Miller CS (2016) Long-term survival and vitality outcomes of permanent teeth following deep caries treatment with step-wise and partial-caries-removal: a systematic review. J Dent 54:25–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Schwendicke F, Stolpe M, Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Dörfer CE (2013) Cost-effectiveness of one- and two-step incomplete and complete excavations. J Dent Res 92(10):880–887.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034513500792 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, J. DM, K.L. VL (2011) State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 27(1):17–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.023 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Casagrande L, Bento LW, Dalpian DM et al (2010) Indirect pulp treatment in primary teeth: 4-year results, vol 23. Am J Dent, pp 34–38Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dalpian DM, Casagrande L, Franzon R et al (2012) Dentin microhardness of primary teeth undergoing partial carious removal, vol 36. J Clin Pediatr Dent, pp 363–367Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schwendicke F, Göstemeyer G, Gluud C (2015) Cavity lining after excavating caries lesions: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Dent 43(11):1291–1297.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.07.017 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pereira MA, dos Santos-Júnior RB, Tavares JA et al (2017) No additional benefit of using a calcium hydroxide liner during stepwise caries removal: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 148(6):369–376.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2017.02.019 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tomson PL, Lumley PJ, Smith AJ, Cooper PR (2016) Growth factor release from dentine matrix by pulp capping agents promote pulp tissue repair-associated events. Int Endod J 50:281–292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Graham L, Cooper PR, Cassidy N, Nor JE, Sloan AJ, Smith AJ (2006) The effect of calcium hydroxide on solubilisation of bio-active dentine matrix components. Biomaterials 27(14):2865–2873.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.12.020 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leites AB, Baldissera EZ, Silva AF, Tarquinio S, Botero T, Piva E, Demarco FF (2011) Histologic response and tenascin and fibronectin expression after pulp capping in pig primary teeth with mineral trioxide aggregate or calcium hydroxide. Oper Dent 36(4):448–456.  https://doi.org/10.2341/10-321-L PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Piva E, Tarquinio SB, Demarco FF et al (2006) Immunohistochemical expression of fibronectin and tenascin after direct pulp capping with calcium hydroxide. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102(4):e66–e71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.01.015 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    About I, Mitsiadis TA (2001) Molecular aspects of tooth pathogenesis and repair: in vivo and in vitro models. Adv Dent Res 15(1):59–62.  https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374010150011501 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Garcia JM, Martins MD, Jaeger RG, Marques MM (2003) Immunolocalization of bone extracellular matrix proteins (type I collagen, osteonectin and bone sialoprotein) in human dental pulp and cultured pulp cells. Int Endod J 36(6):404–410.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00669.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Luiz de Oliveira da Rosa W, Machado da Silva T, Fernando Demarco F, Piva E, Fernandes da Silva A (2017) Could the application of bioactive molecules improve vital pulp therapy success? A systematic review. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 105(3):941–956.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.35968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bowen WH, Pearson SK, Young DA (1988) The effect of desalivation on coronal and root surface caries in rats. J Dent Res 67(1):21–23.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670010301 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG (2010) Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 8(6):e1000412.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Keyes PH (1958) Dental caries in the molar teeth of rats. Distribution of lesions induced by high carbohydrate low-fat diets. J Dent Res 37(6):1077–1087.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345580370060801 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    International Standard Organization. ISO 7405 (2008) Dentistry evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry. International Standard Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brown RC, Hopps HC (1973) Staining of bacteria in tissue sections: a reliable gram stain method. Am J Clin Pathol 60(2):234–240.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/60.2.234 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dammaschke T (2010) Rat molar teeth as a study model for direct pulp capping research in dentistry. Lab Anim 44(1):1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1258/la.2009.008120 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Papadimitriou S, Tziafas D (2007) Pulpal responses after application of current adhesive systems to deep cavities. Clin Oral Investig 11(4):313–320.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-007-0121-4 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    de Souza Costa CA et al (2007) Biocompatibility of resin-based dental materials applied as liners in deep cavities prepared in human teeth. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 81(1):175–184.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30651 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tziafas D, Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Tziafa C, Papadimitriou S (2007) Effects of a new antibacterial adhesive on the repair capacity of the pulp-dentine complex in infected teeth. Int Endod J 40(1):58–66.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01183.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Doi J, Nishitani Y, Yamada T, Itou K, Carvalho RM, Nakajima M, Pashley DH (2002) Bonding of self-etch and total-etch adhesives to carious dentin. J Dent Res 81(8):556–560.  https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100811 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Imazato S (2003) Antibacterial properties of resin composites and dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 19(6):449–457.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00102-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nishitani Y, Yoshiyama M, Wadgaonkar B, Breschi L, Mannello F, Mazzoni A, Carvalho RM, Tjaderhane L, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2006) Activation of gelatinolytic/collagenolytic activity in dentin by self-etching adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 114(2):160–166.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00342.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cocco AR, Rosa WL, Silva AF et al (2015) A systematic review about antibacterial monomers used in dental adhesive systems: current status and further prospects. Dent Mater 31(11):1345–1362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.08.155 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lee JH, Lee HH, Kim H et al (2017) Immunomodulatory/anti-inflammatory effect of ZOE-based dental materials. Dent Mater 33:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schmalz G, Galler KM (2017) Biocompatibility of biomaterials—lessons learned and considerations for the design of novel materials. Dent Mater 33(4):382–393.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.01.011 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Meryon SD (1988) An in vitro study of factors contributing to the blandness of zinc oxide-eugenol preparations in vivo. Int Endod J 21(3):200–204.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1988.tb00975.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schmalz G, Hoffmann M, Weis K, Schweikl H (2000) Influence of albumin and collagen on the cell mortality evoked by zinc oxide-eugenol in vitro. J Endod 26(5):284–287.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200005000-00008 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Martínez-Herrera A, Pozos-Guillén A, Ruiz-Rodríguez S, Garrocho-Rangel A, Vértiz-Hernández A, Escobar-García DM (2016) Effect of 4-allyl-1-hydroxy-2-methoxybenzene (eugenol) on inflammatory and apoptosis processes in dental pulp fibroblasts. Mediat Inflamm 2016:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9371403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gonzalez-Lara et al (2016) Zinc oxide-eugenol pulpotomy in primary teeth: a 24-month follow-up. J Clin Pediatr Dent 40(2):107–112.  https://doi.org/10.17796/1053-4628-40.2.107 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hui-Derksen EK et al (2013) Retrospective record review: reinforced zinc oxide-eugenol pulpotomy: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent 35:43–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fitzgerald M, Heys RJ (2013) A clinical and histological evaluation of conservative pulpal therapy in human teeth. Oper Dent 16:101–112Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Murray PE, Garcia-Godoy F (2007) Comparison of the clinical and preclinical biocompatibility testing of dental materials: are the ISO usage tests meaningful? J Biomed Mater Res A 81(1):51–58.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.31015 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Baratieri LN, Machado A, Van Noort R, Ritter AV, Baratieri NM (2002) Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results. Oper Dent 27:319–324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Whitworth JM, Myers PM, Smith J, Walls AW, McCabe JF (2005) Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice. Int Endod J 38(6):409–416.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00962.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wegehaupt F, Betke H, Solloch N, Musch U, Wiegand A, Attin T (2009) Influence of cavity lining and remaining dentin thickness on the occurrence of postoperative hypersensitivity of composite restorations. J Adhes Dent 11(2):137–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Corralo DJ, Maltz M (2013) Clinical and ultrastructural effects of different liners/restorative materials on deep carious dentin: a randomized clinical trial. Caries Res 47(3):243–250.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000345648 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Marchi JJ, de Araujo FB, Fröner AM et al (2006) Indirect pulp capping in the primary dentition: a 4 year follow-up study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 31:68–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Schwendicke F, Brouwer F, Stolpe M (2015) Calcium hydroxide versus mineral trioxide aggregate for direct pulp capping: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Endod 41(12):1969–1974.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.019 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Barker TH, Framson P, Puolakkainen PA, Reed M, Funk SE, Sage EH (2005) Matricellular homologs in the foreign body response: hevin suppresses inflammation, but hevin and SPARC together diminish angiogenesis. Am J Pathol 166(3):923–933.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)62312-7 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Pachman LM, Veis A, Stock S, Abbott K, Vicari F, Patel P, Giczewski D, Webb C, Spevak L, Boskey AL (2006) Composition of calcifications in children with juvenile dermatomyositis: association with chronic cutaneous inflammation. Arthritis Rheum 54(10):3345–3350.  https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22158 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zhao S, Sloan AJ, Murray PE, Lumley PJ, Smith AJ (2000) Ultrastructural localisation of TGF-beta exposure in dentine by chemical treatment. Histochem J 32(8):489–494.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004100518245 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Finkelman RD, Mohan S, Jennings JC et al (1990) Quantitation of growth factors IGF-I, SGF/IGF-II, and TGF-beta in human dentin. J Bone Min Res 5:717–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Smith AJ, Lesot H (2001) Induction and regulation of crown dentinogenesis: embryonic events as a template for dental tissue repair? Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 12(5):425–437.  https://doi.org/10.1177/10454411010120050501 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Piva E, Silva AF, Nor JE (2014) Functionalized scaffolds to control dental pulp stem cell fate. J Endod 40(4):S33–S40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.013 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    McLachlan JL, Smith AJ, Sloan AJ, Cooper PR (2003) Gene expression analysis in cells of the dentine-pulp complex in healthy and carious teeth. Arch Oral Biol 48(4):273–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(03)00003-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ferracane JL, Cooper PR, Smith AJ (2013) Dentin matrix component solubilization by solutions of pH relevant to self-etching dental adhesives. J Adhes Dent 15:407–412PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Sadaghiani L, Gleeson HB, Youde S, Waddington RJ, Lynch CD, Sloan AJ (2016) Growth factor liberation and DPSC response following dentine conditioning. J Dent Res 95(11):1298–1307.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516653568 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Shiba H, Fujita T, Doi N, Nakamura S, Nakanishi K, Takemoto T, Hino T, Noshiro M, Kawamoto T, Kurihara H, Kato Y (1998) Differential effects of various growth factors and cytokines on the syntheses of DNA, type I collagen, laminin, fibronectin, osteonectin/secreted protein, acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC), and alkaline phosphatase by human pulp cells in culture. J Cell Physiol 174(2):194–205.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199802)174:2<194::AID-JCP7>3.0.CO;2-J PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Shiba H, Uchida Y, Kamihagi K, Sakata M, Fujita T, Nakamura S, Takemoto T, Kato Y, Kurihara H (2001) Transforming growth factor-beta1 and basic fibroblast growth factor modulate osteocalcin and osteonectin/SPARC syntheses in vitamin-D-activated pulp cells. J Dent Res 80(7):1653–1659.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345010800071101 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Dammaschke T, Stratmann U, Fischer RJ, Sagheri D, Schäfer E (2011) Proliferation of rat molar pulp cells after direct pulp capping with dentine adhesive and calcium hydroxide. Clin Oral Investig 15(4):577–587.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0409-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Silva GA, Lanza LD, Lopes-Junior N et al (2006) Direct pulp capping with a dentin bonding system in human teeth: a clinical and histological evaluation. Oper Dent 31:297–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adriana Fernandes Da Silva
    • 1
  • Marcelo Rocha Marques
    • 2
  • Wellington Luiz De Oliveira Da Rosa
    • 1
  • Sandra Beatriz Chaves Tarquinio
    • 3
  • Pedro Luiz Rosalen
    • 4
  • Silvana Pereira Barros
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of DentistryFederal University of Pelotas (UFPel)PelotasBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Morphology, School of DentistryState University of Campinas (UNICAMP)PiracicabaBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Semiology and Clinics, School of DentistryFederal University of Pelotas (UFPel)PelotasBrazil
  4. 4.Department of Physiological Sciences, School of DentistryState University of Campinas (UNICAMP)PiracicabaBrazil
  5. 5.Center for Oral and Systemic Diseases, Department of Periodontology, School of DentistryUniversity of North Carolina (UNC)Chapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations