Risk factors associated with new caries lesions in permanent first molars in children: a 5-year historical cohort follow-up study
- 297 Downloads
The objective of this study is to analyze the factors associated with the occurrence of caries in the permanent teeth (PT) and in the permanent first molar (PFM) 5 years after their eruption.
Material and methods
Children born in 2005 and enrolled in a community dental program were included. The inclusion criteria were: age 10 years in 2015; the availability of clinical dental history (CDH) data from before eruption of the PT and a follow-up period of 5 years after eruption of the PT. A total of 206 children were enrolled. Risk factors evaluated were: caries experience in the mother, educational level of the mother, frequent drug use, systemic diseases, eating habits, brushing frequency, presence of molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH) in PT, and caries in deciduous teeth (DT). Associations between explanatory factors and the DMF-T (decayed, missing, filled teeth in PT) and DMFT-M (DMF in PFM) indexes, independently considering cavitated or cavitated and non-cavitated caries as outcomes, were evaluated by poisson regression with robust variance analysis.
In the multivariate analysis, a cariogenic diet, especially soft drinks, was associated to high DMF-T and DMFT-M scores when both cavitated and non-cavitated caries were considered. A brushing frequency < 1 a day was significantly associated to high DMF-T scores. The presence of df-t (decayed and filled temporary teeth) score > 0 and MIH conditioned high DMF-T or DMFT-M values, considering cavitated or cavitated and non-cavitated caries.
The intake of sweets and soft drinks, brushing frequency, caries in DT, and MIH in PT were the best predictors of caries in PT.
Control of risk factors in early childhood is important for preventing caries in PT.
KeywordsCariogenic diet Dental caries Molar incisor hypomineralization Permanent first molar Risk factors
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
The study protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the University of Valencia (procedure number: H1454270187226). Likewise, permission was obtained from the Health Department authorities to use the information contained in the CDHs, previously anonymized by one of the investigators belonging to the medical staff of the Health Department in order to protect patient confidentiality. All the information was processed in abidance with the confidentiality regulations defined under Act 15/1999 referred to personal data protection.
Informed consent was obtained from the parents of all individual participants included in the study.
- 5.Ismail AI, Tellez M, Pitts NB, Ekstrand KR, Ricketts D, Longbottom C, Eggertsson H, Deery C, Fisher J, Young DA, Featherstone JD, Evans W, Zeller GG, Zero D, Martignon S, Fontana M, Zandona A (2013) Caries management pathways preserve dental tissues and promote oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 41:e12–e40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Tickle M (2002) The 80:20 phenomenon: help or hindrance to planning caries prevention programmes?. Community Dent Health19: 39–42Google Scholar
- 9.Gimenez T, Bispo BA, Souza DP, Viganó ME, Wanderley MT, Mendes FM, Bönecker M, Braga MM (2016) Does the decline in caries prevalence of Latin American and Caribbean children continue in the new century? Evidence from systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS One 11:e0164903CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 11.Bravo Pérez M, Almerich Silla JM, Ausina Márquez V, Avilés Gutiérrez P, Blanco González JM, Canorea Díaz E, et al (2016) Encuesta de Salud Oral en España 2015. RCOE 21 (Supl. 1): 8–48Google Scholar
- 15.Maheswari SU, Raja J, Kumar A, Seelan RG (2015) Caries management by risk assessment: a review on current strategies for caries prevention and management. J Pharm Bioallied Sci (Suppl 2): S320–4
- 17.Petersson GH (2003) Assessing caries risk—using the cariogram model. Swed Dent J Suppl 158:1–65Google Scholar
- 23.Batchelor PA, Sheiham A (2003) Grouping of tooth surfaces by susceptibility to caries: a study in 5-16 year-old children. BMC Oral Health 4:1–6Google Scholar
- 24.Ahovuo-Saloranta A, Forss H, Hiiri A, Nordblad A, Mäkelä M (2016) Pit and fissure sealants versus fluoride varnishes for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:CD003067Google Scholar
- 25.Weerheijm KL, Duggal M, Mejáre I, Papagiannoulis L, Koch G, Martens LC et al (2003) Judgement criteria for molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH) in epidemiologic studies: a summary of the European meeting on MIH held in Athens, 2003. Eur J Paediatr Dent 3:110–113Google Scholar
- 34.Gonçalves J de A, Moreira EA, Rauen MS, Rossi A, Borgatto AF (2016) Associations between caries experience, nutritional status, oral hygiene, and diet in a multigenerational cohort. Pediatr Dent 38: 203–211
- 37.Marinho VC, Chong LY, Worthington HV, Walsh T (2016) Fluoride mouthrinses for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane 7:CD002284Google Scholar