Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 1363–1373 | Cite as

Outcome of secondary root canal treatment filled with Thermafil: a 5-year follow-up of retrospective cohort study

  • Chiara Pirani
  • Francesco Iacono
  • Maria Rosaria Gatto
  • Raquel Michelle Fitzgibbon
  • Stefano Chersoni
  • Hagay Shemesh
  • Carlo Prati
Original Article
  • 272 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

The aim of the present retrospective cohort study was to assess the 5-year outcome and survival of secondary root canal treatments (2°RCT), exploring the influence of pre-, intra-, and post-operative variables.

Materials and methods

One hundred thirty-two endodontically retreated teeth were radiographically and clinically re-examined after 5 years. 2°RCT had been performed during a Masters program following standardized protocols and filled with AH Plus/Thermafil (TF). Pre-, intra-, and post-operative data were collected. The 5-year outcome was blindly evaluated and categorized as healed/diseased on the basis of the periapical index. Bivariate analysis and chi-square test evaluated the association between outcome and 31 demographic/clinical parameters. Multilevel analysis was performed at both patient and tooth level. Statistical significance was calculated at 5% level.

Results

At 5-year evaluation, survival rate was 80% with 7.5% lost for endodontic reasons. Eighty-three percent of the teeth were classified as healed. Multilevel analysis identified significant predictors of increased survival: female gender (p = 0.012), absence of a pre-operative metal post (p = 0.017), conservative apical preparation (diameter size < #35) (p = 0.039), teeth restored with a crown (p = 0.009), and final PAI (after 5 years) ≤ 2 (p = 0.001). Multilevel analysis identified as predictor healing: not being a smoker (p = 0.048) and conservative apical preparation < size #35 (p = 0.037).

Conclusions

Outcome of 2°RCT filled with Thermafil was successful at 5 years, showing a high rate of survived and healed teeth comparable to that reported previously for other obturation techniques.

Clinical relevance

Present findings confirm 2°RCT as a valid therapeutic option to retain natural teeth.

Keywords

Carrier-based system Clinical study Outcome predictors Secondary endodontic treatment 

Notes

Funding

The work was supported by the Master in Clinical Endodontology, Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), Alma Mater Studiorum—University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Disclaimer

Although a variety of Dentsply products have been provided to the University of Bologna as part of Dentsply’s global “School Grant Program”, Dentsply was neither aware of this study nor informed of the results prior to publication.

References

  1. 1.
    de Chevigny C, Dao TT, Basrani RB, Marquis V, Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, Friedman S (2008) Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study. Phases 3 and 4: orthograde retreatment. J Endod 34:131–137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, Friedman S (2004) Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study. Phase I and II: orthograde retreatment. J Endod 30:627–633CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Friedman S (1998) Prevention and treatment of apical periodontitis. In: Ørstavik D, Pitt Ford TR (eds) Essential endodontology. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 367–391Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Torabinejad M, White SN (2016) Endodontic treatment options after unsuccessful initial root canal treatment: alternatives to single-tooth implants. JADA 147:214–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kvist T, Reit (1999) Results of endodontic retreatment: a randomized clinical study comparing surgical and nonsurgical procedures. J Endod 25:814–817CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paik S, Sechrist C, Torabinejad M (2004) Levels of evidence for the outcome of endodontic retreatment. J Endod 30:745–750CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Siqueira JF Jr (2001) Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 34:1–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    European Society of Endodontology (2006) Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 39:921–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K (2008) Outcome of secondary root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature. Int Endod J 41:1026–1046CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gorni F, Gagliani M (2004) The outcome of endodontic retreatment: a 2-yr follow-up. J Endod 30:1–4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mirfendereski M, Roth K, Bing F, Dubrowski A, Carnahan H, Azarpazhooh A, Basrani B, Torneck CD, Friedman S (2009) Technique acquisition in the use of two thermoplasticized root filling methods by inexperienced dental students: a micro-CT analysis. J Endod 35:1512–1517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gagliani MA, Cerutti A, Bondesan A, Colombo M, Godio E, Giacomelli G (2004) A 24-month survey on root canal treatment performed by NiTi engine driven files and warm gutta-percha filling associated system. Minerva Stomatol 53:543–554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chu CH, Lo ECM, Cheung GSP (2005) Outcome of root canal treatment using Thermafil and cold lateral condensation filling techniques. Int Endod J 38:179–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hale R, Gatti R, Glickman GN, Opperman LA (2012) Comparative analysis of carrier-based obturation and lateral compaction: a retrospective clinical outcomes study. Int J Dent.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/954675
  15. 15.
    Tennert C, Jungback IL, Wrbas KT (2013) Comparison between two thermoplastic root canal obturation techniques regarding extrusion of root canal filling—a retrospective in vivo study. Clin Oral Investig 17:449–454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pirani C, Friedman S, Gatto MR, Iacono F, Tinarelli V, Gandolfi MG, Prati C (2017) Survival and periapical health after root canal treatment with carrier-based root fillings: five-year retrospective assessment. Int Endod J.  https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12757
  17. 17.
    Demirci GK, Çalişkan MK (2016) A prospective randomized comparative study of cold lateral condensation versus core/gutta-percha in teeth with periapical lesions. J Endod 42:206–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (2000) Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. The Journal of American Medical Association 284:3043–3045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ørstavik D, Kerekes K, Eriksen HM (1986) The periapical index: a scoring system for radiographic assessment of apical periodontitis. Endod Dent Traumatol 2:20–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Friedman S, Abitbol S, Lawrence HP (2003) Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto Study. Phase I: initial treatment. J Endod 29:787–793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kirkevang LL, Væth M, Hörsted-Bindslev P, Bahrami G, Wenzel A (2007) Risk factors for developing apical periodontitis in a general population. Int Endod J 40:290–299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hussein FE, Liew AKC, Ramlee RA, Abdullah D, Chong BS (2016) Factors associated with apical periodontitis: a multilevel analysis. J Endod 10:1441–1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fonzar F, Fonzar A, Buttolo P, Worthington HW, Esposito M (2009) The prognosis of root canal therapy: a 10-year retrospective cohort study on 411 patients with 1175 endodontically treated teeth. Eur J Oral Implantol 2:201–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Salehrabi R, Rotstein I (2010) Epidemiologic evaluation of the outcomes of orthograde endodontic retreatment. J Endod 36:790–792CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K (2011) A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 2: tooth survival. Int Endod J 44:610–625CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sjӧgren U, Hägglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K (1990) Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 16:498–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Çalişkan MK (2005) Nonsurgical retreatment of teeth with periapical lesions previously managed by either endodontic or surgical intervention. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 100:242–248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Imura N, Pinheiro, Gomes B, Zaia AA, Ferraz CCR, Souza-Filho FJ (2007) The outcome of endodontic treatment: a retrospective study of 2000 cases performed by a specialist. J Endod 33:1278–1282Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pirani C, Chersoni S, Montebugnoli L, Prati C (2015) Long-term outcome of non-surgical root canal treatment: a retrospective analysis. Odontology 103:185–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sundqvist GS, Figdor D, Persson S, Sjögren U (1998) Microbiologic analysis of teeth with failed endodontic treatment and the outcome of conservative re-treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 85:86–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ricucci D, Russo J, Rutberg M, Burleson JA, Spångberg LS (2011) A prospective cohort study of endodontic treatments of 1369 root canals: results after 5 years. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 112:825–842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Carr GB, Schwartz RS, Schaudinn C, Gorur A, Costerton W (2009) Ultrastructural examination of failed molar retreatment with secondary apical periodontitis: an examination of endodontic biofilms in an endodontic retreatment failure. J Endod 35:1303–1309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chávez de Paz L (2007) Redefining the persistent infection in root canals: possible role of biofilm communities. J Endod 33:652–662CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Pirani C, Pelliccioni GA, Marchionni S, Montebugnoli L, Piana G, Prati C (2009) Effectiveness of three different retreatment techniques in canals filled with compacted gutta-percha or Thermafil. A SEM study. J Endod 35:1433–1440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gandolfi MG, Parrilli AP, Fini M, Prati C, Dummer PMH (2013) 3D micro-CT analysis of the interface voids associated with Thermafil root fillings used with AH Plus or a flowable MTA sealer. Int Endod J 46:253–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ng Y-L, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K (2007) Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature—part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probability of success. Int Endod J 40:921–939Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Peak JD, Hayes SJ, Bryant ST, Dummer PM (2001) The outcome of root canal treatment. A retrospective study within the armed forces (Royal Air Force). Br Dent J 190:140–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Torabinejad M, Corr R, Handysides R, Shabahang S (2009) Outcomes of nonsurgical retreatments and endodontic surgery: a systematic review. J Endod 35:930–937Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hoskinson SE, Ng YL, Hoskinson AE, Moles DR, Gulabivala K (2002) A retrospective comparison of outcome of root canal treatment using two different protocols. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 93:705–715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Alley BS, Kitchens GG, Alley LV, Eleazer PD (2004) A comparison of survival of teeth following endodontic treatment performed by general dentists or specialists. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 98:115–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Burry JC, Stover S, Eichmiller F, Bhagavatula P (2016) Outcomes of primary endodontic therapy provided by endodontic specialists compared with other providers. J Endod 42:702–705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Fransson H, Dawson VS, Frisk F, Bjørndal L, Kvist T (2016) Survival of root-filled teeth in the Swedish adult population. J Endod 42:216–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ferrari M, Mason PN, Goracci C, Pashley DH, Tay FR (2004) Collagen degradation in endodontically treated teeth after clinical function. J Dent Res 83:414–419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K (2010) Tooth survival following non-surgical root canal treatment: a systematic review of the literature. Int Endod J 43:171–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Landys Borén D, Jonasson P, Kvist T (2015) Long-term survival of endodontically treated teeth at a public dental specialist clinic. J Endod 41:176–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kirkevang LL, Ørstavik D, Bahrami G, Wenzel A, Væth (2017) Prediction of periapical status and tooth extraction. Int Endod J 50:5–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dammaschke T, Steven D, Kaup M, Reiner KH (2003) Long-term survival of root-canal-treated teeth: a retrospective study over 10 years. J Endod 29:638–643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lazarsky MP, Walker WA, Flores CM, Schindler WG, Hargreaves KM (2001) Epidemiological evaluation of the outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment in a large cohort of insured dental patients. J Endod 27:791–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    García-Guerrero C, Parra-Junco C, Quijano-Guauque S, Molano N, Pineda GA, Marín-Zuluaga DJ (2017) Vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth: a retrospective analysis of possible risk factors. J Investig Clin Dent.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12273
  50. 50.
    Aminoshariae A, Kulid JC (2015) Master apical file size—smaller or larger: a systematic review of healing outcomes. Int Endod J 48:639–647CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Saini HR, Tewari S, Sangwan P, Duhan J, Gupta A (2012) Effect of different apical preparation sizes on outcome of primary endodontic treatment: a randomized controlled trial. J Endod 38:1309–1315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wu MK, R’oris A, Barkis D, Wesselink PR (2000) Prevalence and extent of long oval canals in the apical third. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89:739–743CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ricucci D, Rôças IN, Alves FRF, Loghin S, Siqueira JF Jr (2016) Apically extruded sealers: fate and influence on treatment outcome. J Endod 42:43–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sarkis-Onofre R, Fergusson D, Cenci MS, Moher D, Pereira-Cenci D (2017) Performance of post-retained single crowns: a systematic review of related risk factors. J Endod 43:175–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kishen A (2006) Mechanisms and risk factors for fracture predilection in endodontically treated teeth. Endod Top 13:57–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Azim AA, Griggs JA, Huang GTJ (2016) The Tennessee study: factors affecting treatment outcome and healing time following nonsurgical root canal treatment. Int Endod J 49:6–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Duncan HF, Pitt Ford R (2006) The potential association between smoking and endodontic disease. Int Endod J 39:843–854CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kirkevang LL, Wenzel A (2003) Risk indicators for apical periodontitis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 31:59–67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chiara Pirani
    • 1
  • Francesco Iacono
    • 1
  • Maria Rosaria Gatto
    • 1
  • Raquel Michelle Fitzgibbon
    • 1
  • Stefano Chersoni
    • 1
  • Hagay Shemesh
    • 2
  • Carlo Prati
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), School of Dentistry, Endodontic Clinical Section, Master in Clinical EndodontologyAlma Mater Studiorum University of BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.Endodontology, Academic Center for Dentistry AmsterdamUniversity of Amsterdam and VU UniversityAmsterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations