Advertisement

Clinical Oral Investigations

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 1157–1165 | Cite as

Bacterial penetration into filled root canals exposed to different pressures and to the oral environment—in vivo analysis

  • Ana Maria Hecke Alves
  • Maria Helena Pozzobon
  • Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi
  • Cleonice da Silveira Teixeira
  • Beatriz Dulcinéia Mendes Souza
  • Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia
  • Wilson Tadeu Felippe
Original Article
  • 121 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

The study aims to correlate the depth of bacterial penetration into filled root canals with the time of exposure to the oral environment and different pressures.

Materials and methods

One-hundred and twenty-two root canals of male Beagle dog teeth were prepared and filled. The root canals were distributed into three groups, according to the pressure applied: (A) no pressure, (B) 30 kPa, and (C) 60 kPa. Then, the root canals were exposed to the oral environment, establishing sub-groups considering the time intervals of exposure: (1) 45 days and (2) 120 days (n = 17). Sub-groups had positive and negative controls (n = 5). The animals were sacrificed, and the specimens were prepared for histological analysis.

Results

There was no significant difference in the bacterial penetration among groups A, B, and C at 45 days (P = 0.903) and 120 days (P = 0.211). No statistically significant difference was found (P = 0.608) between the exposure time intervals. Most of the specimens from experimental groups exposed for 120 days presented moderate inflammatory infiltrate.

Conclusions

Pressures of 30 and 60 kPa did not affect sealing ability of root canal filling. The time of exposure did not influence bacterial penetration, which was limited to the first 4 mm of the root canals exposed for 120 days.

Clinical relevance

This animal study demonstrated that disinfection of the first millimeters of root canals could be considered before retreatment of their entire length. However, clinical studies in humans should be conducted before validation of this protocol.

Keywords

Endodontics Sealing methodology Bacterial penetration Periapical inflammation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the staff of the Technical, Operatory, and Experimental Surgical Laboratory (Federal University of Santa Catarina), Dr. Jorge Bins-Ely, Dr. Newton Macuco Capella, and Luiz Henrique Prazeres. The authors also thank Marco Antonio de Lorenzo, Dr. Elena Riet Correa Rivero, Sergio Batista de Andrade, and Jackeline Natividade for their general support.

Funding

No funding was reported for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was conducted in compliance with all the applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

References

  1. 1.
    Bouillaguet S, Wataha JC, Lockwood PE, Galgano C, Golay A, Krejci I (2004) Cytotoxicity and sealing properties of four classes of endodontic sealers evaluated by succinic dehydrogenase activity and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Eur J Oral Sci 112:182–187.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00115.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Williamson AE, Dawson DV, Drake DR, Walton RE, Rivera EM (2005) Effect of root canal filling/sealer systems on apical endotoxin penetration: a coronal leakage evaluation. J Endod 31:599–604.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000153843.25887.69 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xu Q, Fan MW, Fan B, Cheung GSP, Hu HL (2005) A new quantitative method using glucose for analysis of endodontic leakage. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 99:107–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.06.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zehnder M, Baumgartner G, Marquardt K, Paqué F (2007) Prevention of bacterial leakage through instrumented root canals by bioactive glass S53P4 and calcium hydroxide suspensions in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103:423–428.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.10.021 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oliveira ACM, Tanomaru JMG, Faria-Junior N, Tanomaru-Filho M (2011) Bacterial leakage in root canals filled with conventional and MTA-based sealers. Int Endod J 44:370–375.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01852.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Duggan D, Arnold RR, Teixeira FB, Caplan DJ, Tawil P (2009) Periapical inflammation and bacterial penetration after coronal inoculation of dog roots filled with RealSeal 1 or Thermafil. J Endod 35:852–857.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.03.050 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Plotino G, Grande NM, Manzulli N, Chiaradia G, Torre GL, Somma F (2007) Influence of reduced air pressure methods on dye penetration in standardized voids. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103:289–294.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.05.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rechenberg DK, De-Deus G, Zehnder M (2011) Potential systematic error in laboratory experiments on microbial leakage through filled root canals: review of published articles. Int Endod J 44:183–194.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01821.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pommel L, Camps J (2001) Effects of pressure and measurement time on the fluid filtration methods in endodontics. J Endod 27:256–258.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200104000-00003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Bruyne MA, De Bruyne RJ, Rosiers L, De Moor RJ (2005) Longitudinal study on microleakage of three root-end filling materials by fluid transport method and by capillary flow porometry. Int Endod J 38:129–136.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00919.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wimonchit S, Timpawat S, Vongsavan N (2002) A comparison of techniques for assessment of coronal dye leakage. J Endod 28:1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200201000-00001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pathomvanich S, Edmunds DH (1996) Variation in the microleakage produced by four different techniques in root fillings in a simulated root canal model. Int Endod J 29:156–162.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1996.tb01362.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hirai VH, da Silva Neto UX, Westphalen VP, Perin CP, Carneiro E, Fariniuk LF (2010) Comparative analysis of leakage in root canal fillings performed with gutta-percha and Resilon cones with AH Plus and Epiphany sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:e131–e135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.09.038 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ricucci D, Bergenholtz G (2003) Bacterial status in root-filled teeth exposed to the oral environment by loss of restoration and fracture or caries—a histobacteriological study of treated cases. Int Endod J 36:787–802.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00721.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gomes MS, Barletta FB, Della Bona A, Vanni JR, Pereira CC, de Figueiredo JA (2007) Microbial leakage and apical inflammatory response in dog’s teeth after root canal filling with different sealers, post space preparation and exposure to the oral environment. J Appl Oral Sci 15:429–436.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572007000500011 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yamauchi S, Shipper G, Buttke T, Yamauchi M, Trope M (2006) Effect of orifice plugs on periapical inflammation in dogs. J Endod 32:524–526.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ferreira R, Bombana AC, Sayeg IJ (2008) In vitro analysis of the penetration of methylene blue dye in human radicular dentin using different methods of impregnation. Aust Endod J 34:110–114.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00107.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kececi AD, Kaya BU, Belli S (2010) Corono-apical leakage of various root filling materials using two different penetration models—a 3-month study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 92:261–267.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31513 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vasconcelos BC, Bernardes RA, Duarte MA, Bramante CM, Moraes IG (2011) Apical sealing of root canal fillings performed with five different endodontic sealers: analysis by fluid filtration. J Appl Oral Sci 19:324–328.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572011005000005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fisher MA, Berzins DW, Bahcall JK (2007) An in vitro comparison of bond strength of various obturation materials to root canal dentin using a push-out test design. J Endod 33:856–858.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2007.02.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wu MK, van der Sluis LW, Ardila CN, Wesselink PR (2003) Fluid movement along the coronal two-thirds of root fillings placed by three different gutta-percha techniques. Int Endod J 36:533–540.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00685.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu MK, Bud MG, Wesselink PR (2009) The quality of single cone and laterally compacted gutta-percha fillings in small and curved root canals as evidenced by bidirectional radiographs and fluid transport measurements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108:946–951.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.07.046 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Böttcher DE, Hirai VH, Da Silva-Neto UX, Grecca FS (2010) Effect of calcium hydroxide dressing on the long-term sealing ability of two different endodontic sealers: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 110:386–389.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.05.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ran S, Wang J, Jiang W, Zhu C, Liang J (2015) Assessment of dentinal tubule invasion capacity of Enterococcus faecalis under stress conditions ex vivo. Int Endod J 48:362–372.  https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12322 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Teixeira CS, Alfredo E, Thomé LH, Gariba-Silva R, Silva-Sousa YT, Sousa-Neto MD (2009) Adhesion of an endodontic sealer to dentin and gutta-percha: shear and push-out bond strength measurements and SEM analysis. J Appl Oral Sci 17:129–135.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000200011 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ricucci D, Lin LM, Spångberg LS (2009) Wound healing of apical tissues after root canal therapy: a long-term clinical, radiographic, and histopathologic observation study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108:609–621.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.05.028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Holland R, Manne LN, de Souza V, Murata SS, Dezan Júnior E (2007) Periapical tissue healing after post space preparation with or without use of a protection plug and root canal exposure to the oral environment. Study in dogs. Braz Dent J 18:281–288.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402007000400002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Fransen JN, He J, Glickman GN, Rios A, Shulman JD, Honeyman A (2008) Comparative assessment of ActiV GP/glass ionomer sealer, Resilon/Epiphany, and gutta-percha/AH plus obturation: a bacterial leakage study. J Endod 34:725–727.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.03.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Eldeniz AU, Ørstavik D (2009) A laboratory assessment of coronal bacterial leakage in root canals filled with new and conventional sealers. Int Endod J 42:303–312.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01509.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mah T, Basrani B, Santos JM, Pascon EA, Tjäderhane L, Yared G, Lawrence HP, Friedman S (2003) Periapical inflammation affecting coronally-inoculated dog teeth with root fillings augmented by white MTA orifice plugs. J Endod 29:442–446.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200307000-00004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wijnbergen M, Van Mullem PJ (1987) Effect of histological decalcifying agents on number and stainability of gram-positive bacteria. J Dent Res 66:1029–1031.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660050701 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Maria Hecke Alves
    • 1
  • Maria Helena Pozzobon
    • 1
  • Eduardo Antunes Bortoluzzi
    • 1
  • Cleonice da Silveira Teixeira
    • 1
  • Beatriz Dulcinéia Mendes Souza
    • 1
  • Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia
    • 1
  • Wilson Tadeu Felippe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Dentistry-Endodontics Division, Health Sciences CenterFederal University of Santa CatarinaFlorianópolisBrazil

Personalised recommendations