Bond durability of universal adhesive to bovine enamel using self-etch mode
- 197 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to examine the enamel bond durability of universal adhesives in the self-etch mode under 2-year water storage and thermal cycling conditions.
Materials and methods
Three commercially available universal adhesives and a gold standard two-step self-etch adhesive were used. Ten specimens of bovine enamel were prepared per test group, and shear bond strength (SBS) was measured to determine the bonding durability after thermal cycling (TC) or long-term water storage (WS). The bonded specimens were divided into three groups: (1) specimens subjected to TC, where the bonded specimens were stored in 37 °C distilled water for 24 h before being subjected to 3000, 10,000, 20,000 or 30,000 TC; (2) specimens stored in 37 °C distilled water for 3 months, 6 months, 1 year or 2 year; and (3) specimens stored in 37 °C distilled water for 24 h, serving as a baseline.
The two-step self-etch adhesive showed significantly higher SBS than the universal adhesives tested, regardless of the type of degradation method. All universal adhesives showed no significant enamel SBS reductions in TC and WS, when compared to baseline and the other degradation conditions.
Compared to the bond strengths obtained with the two-step self-etch adhesive, significantly lower bond strengths were obtained with universal adhesives. However, the enamel bond durability of universal adhesives was relatively stable under both degradation conditions tested.
The present data indicate that the enamel bond durability of universal adhesives in the self-etch mode might be sufficient for clinical use.
KeywordsUniversal adhesive Bonding durability Thermal cycling Two-year water storage
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This study does not contain any studies with human participants and subjects or animals performed by any of the authors.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- 3.Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ (2000) Minimal intervention dentistry—a review. FDI Commission Project 1–97. Int Dent J 50:501–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2000.tb00540.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Scheidel DD, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2015) Effect of phosphoric acid pre-etching on fatigue limits of self-etching adhesives. Oper Dent 40:379–395. doi: https://doi.org/10.2341/13–252-L
- 14.Frassetto A, Breschi L, Turco G, Marchesi G, Di Lenarda R, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Cadenaro M (2016) Mechanisms of degradation of the hybrid layer in adhesive dentistry and therapeutic agents to improve bond durability—a literature review. Dent Mater 32:e41–e53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, Berry TP, Watanabe H, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2016) Influence of different etching modes on bond strength and fatigue strength to dentin using universal adhesive systems. Dent Mater 32:e9–e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.ISO 29022: 2013 Dentistry-Adhesion-Notched-edge shear bond strength test. 1stedn. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization. ISO (2013) 1–12.Google Scholar
- 26.Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B (2007) Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomater 28:3757–3785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials2007.04.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Powers JM, Wataha JC (2013) Dental materials: properties and manipulation chapter 2 properties of materials 14–25, 10th ed. Missouri:Mosby, Elsevier Inc., USA.Google Scholar
- 34.Tsuchiya K, Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsubota K, Tsujimoto A, Berry TP, Erickson RL, Latta MA, Miyazaki M (2016) Effect of functional monomer (MDP) on the enamel bond durability of single-step self-etch adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 124:96–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12232 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar