Game-based assessment tool using convergence of gamification and motivation theory in intelligent tutoring system

Abstract

As the online education market grows steadily, video lecture–based online educational environments such as the massive open online course (MOOC), open courseware (OCW), and flipped classroom are being used diversely in informal as well as formal education. However, since the learning in the online educational environment is predominantly conducted by the learners themselves, problems such as low motivation, low concentration, and low completion rates have been identified. For this paper, we developed a game-based assessment tool that can enhance the learning motivation and concentration and automatically determine if the learning without mind-wandering has been completed; accordingly, we applied it in university classes as part of a verification experiment to investigate the educational usability. The experiment results showed that the game-based assessment tool positively impacted the learning motivation and reduced the learning burden; besides, all of the subjects could enjoy both parts of the game-based assessment tool regardless of his/her learning ability. Finally, a sufficiently high potential was identified regarding the educational usability of the game-based assessment tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. 1.

    Dai HM, Teo T, Rappa NA (2020) Understanding continuance intention among MOOC participants: the role of habit and MOOC performance. Comput Human Behavior 112

  2. 2.

    Friedman T (2013) Revolution hits the universities. New York Times 26(1)

  3. 3.

    Littenberg-Tobias J, Reich J (2020) Evaluating access, quality, and equity in online learning: a case study of a MOOC-based blended professional degree program. Internet Higher Educ 47

  4. 4.

    Sallam MH, Martín-Monje E, Li Y (2020) Research trends in language MOOC studies: a systematic review of the published literature (2012–2018). Comput Assist Lang Learn:1–28

  5. 5.

    Goopio J, Cheung C (2020) The MOOC dropout phenomenon and retention strategies. J Teach Travel Tour:1–21

  6. 6.

    Bruner IIGC, Kumar A (2005) Applying TAM to consumer usage of handheld Internet devices. J Bus Res 58(5):553–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Igbaria M, Parasuraman S, Baroudi JJ (1996) A motivational model of microcomputer usage. J Manag Inf Syst 13(1):127–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Choi M-s (2011) A study on the influence of factors such as personal innovativeness, social influence and user interface on smart phone acceptance: based on an expanded technology acceptance model. The Graduate School of Ewha Womans University

  9. 9.

    Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 319–340

  10. 10.

    In-Jun H, Seong-Il L (2010) The study of knowing the intention to adopt smartphone by extending Technology Acceptance Model. Paper presented at the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers 2010 Conference

  11. 11.

    Kim S-H (2010) Effects of perceived attributes on the purchase intention of smart-phone. J Korea Contents Assoc 10(9):318–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lee YI (2010) A study on the smart-phone TAM and satisfaction of college students. J Korea Res Acad Distrib Manag 13(5):93–110

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lin C-C (2013) Exploring the relationship between technology acceptance model and usability test. Inf Technol Manag 14(3):243–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kim HJ, Jung CH (2008) The impacts of commodity and user characteristics on customersʼ intention to reuse in mobile banking services. J Bus Educ 21:215–246

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Suh C-K, Seong S-J (2004) Individual characteristics affecting user’s intention to use internet shopping mall. Asia Pac J Inf Syst 14

  16. 16.

    Wang J, Senecal S (2007) Measuring perceived website usability. J Internet Commer 6(4):97–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Dietz J (1997) Satisfaction: a behavioral perspective on the consumer. J Consum Mark 14:401–404

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lee YN, Lee LY, Park HH, Park SH (2007) The study on brand image by relationship quality (satisfaction, trust, commitment) of family restaurants effects on brand loyalty: focusing on customers at their twenties. J Korea Hotel Resort Assoc 6(2):221–238

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Oliver RL (2014) Satisfaction: a behavioral perspective on the consumer. Routledge

  20. 20.

    Lawshe CH (1975) A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol 28(4):563–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wilson FR, Pan W, Schumsky DA (2012) Recalculation of the critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio. Meas Eval Couns Dev 45(3):197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Morgan DL (1996) Focus groups as qualitative research, vol 16. Sage publications

  23. 23.

    Richardson CA, Rabiee F (2001) A question of access: an exploration of the factors that influence the health of young males aged 15 to 19 living in Corby and their use of health care services. Health Educ J 60(1):3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Seggern V, Marilyn Y, Nancy J (2003) The focus group method in libraries: issues relating to process and data analysis. Ref Serv Rev 31(3):272–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Krueger RA, Casey MA (2014) Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Sage publications

  26. 26.

    Spencer LM, Spencer Y, Spencer S (2011) Competence at work. Models for superior performance. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2018R1D1A1B07051369).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shin-hyeong Choi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

We certify that the submission is original work and is not under review at any other publication.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jo, J., Yi, E., Yang, Y. et al. Game-based assessment tool using convergence of gamification and motivation theory in intelligent tutoring system. Pers Ubiquit Comput (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-021-01523-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Gamification
  • Online convergence education
  • MOOC
  • Video-based learning