Skip to main content
Log in

Sentiment analysis and Twitter: a game proposal

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pervasive sensing of people’s opinions is becoming critical in strategic decision processes, as it may be helpful in identifying problems and strengthening strategies. A recent research trend is to understand users’ opinions through a sentiment analysis of contents published in the Twitter platform. This approach involves two challenges: the large volume of available data and the large variety of used languages combined with the brevity of texts. The former makes manual analysis unreasonable, whereas the latter complicates any type of automatic analysis. Since sentiment analysis is a difficult process for computers, but it is quite simple for humans, in this article, we transform the sentiment analysis process into a game. Indeed, we consider the game with a purpose approach and we propose a game that involves users in classifying the polarity (e.g., positive, negative, neutral) and the sentiment (e.g., joy, surprise, sadness) of tweets. To evaluate the proposal, we used a dataset of 52,877 tweets, we developed a Web-based game, we invited people to play the game, and we validated the results through two different methods: ground-truth and manual assessment. The obtained results showed that the game approach is effective in measuring people’ sentiments and also highlighted that participants liked to play the game.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://wing.comp.nus.edu.sg/SMSCorpus/

  2. http://www.mturk.com/mturk/

  3. http://www.felicitta.net

References

  1. Amaba BA (2014) Industrial and business systems for smart cities. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on emerging multimedia applications and services for smart cities, pp 21–22

  2. Seki Y (2016) Use of twitter for analysis of public sentiment for improvement of local government service. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on smart computing, pp 1–3

  3. Ainsworth JW (2002) Why does it take a village? the mediation of neighborhood effects on educational achievement. Soc Forces 81(1):117–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Galster G (2012) The mechanism(s) of neighbourhood effects: theory, evidence and policy implications. In: Neighbourhood effects research: new perspectives, Springer, pp 23–56

  5. Gallup-Healthways Well-being index. Technical report

  6. Montangero M, Furini M (2015) Trank: ranking twitter users according to specific topics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE consumer communications and networking conference, pp 767–772

  7. Sahu S, Rout SK, Mohanty D (2015) Twitter sentiment analysis — a more enhanced way of classification and scoring. In: Proceedings of IEEE international symposium on nanoelectronic and information systems, pp 67–72

  8. Furini M, Tamanini V (2015) Location privacy and public metadata in social media platforms: attitudes, behaviors and opinions. Multimedia Tools and Applications 74(21):9795–9825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Furini M (2014) Users behavior in location-aware services: digital natives vs digital immigrants. Advances in Human-Computer Interaction

  10. Hernańdez Farías DI, Patti V, Rosso P (2016) Irony detection in twitter: the role of affective content. ACM Trans Internet Technol 16(3):19:1–19:24

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bujari A, Furini M, Lainà N (2017) On using cashtags to predict companies stock trends. In: Proceedings of the IEEE consumer communications and networking conference (CCNC)

  12. Nakov P, Rosenthal S, Kozareva Z, Stoyanov V, Ritter A, Wilson T (2013) Semeval-2013 task 2: Sentiment analysis in twitter. In: Proceedings of the Seventh international workshop on semantic evaluation, pp 312–320

  13. Nielsen FÅ (2011) A new ANEW: evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs. In: Proceedings of the extended semantic web conference, pp 93–98

  14. de Albornoz JC, Plaza L, Gervás P (2012) Sentisense: an easily scalable concept-based affective lexicon for sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the Eight international conference on language resources and evaluation

  15. Saif H, Fernandez M, He Y, Alani H (2013) Evaluation datasets for twitter sentiment analysis: a survey and a new dataset, the sts-gold. In: Proceedings of the workshop on emotion and sentiment in social and expressive media: approaches and perspectives from AI

  16. Bosco C , Allisio L, Mussa V, Patti V, Ruffo G, Sanguinetti M, Sulis E (2014) Detecting happiness in italian tweets: towards an evaluation dataset for sentiment analysis in felicittá. In: Proc of the 5th workshop on emotion, social, signals, sentiment & linked open data

  17. Sang ETK (2014) Using tweets for assigning sentiments to regions. In: Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on emotion, social signals, sentiment & linked open data

  18. Bosco C, Patti V, Bolioli A (2013) Developing corpora for sentiment analysis. The case of irony and senti-tut. IEEE Intell Syst 28(2):55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Furini M (2007) Mobile games: What to expext in the near future. In: Proceedings of GAMEON conference on simulation and AI in computer games, EuroSis Society

  20. Kirman B, Björk S, Deterding S, Paavilainen J, Rao V (2011) Social game studies at CHI 2011. In: Proceedings of human factors in computing systems, pp 17–20

  21. von Ahn L, Dabbish L (2008) Designing games with a purpose. Commun ACM 51(8):58–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Furini M, Montangero M (2016) Tsentiment: on gamifying twitter sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of IEEE symposium on computers and communication, pp 91–96

  23. Gerrod Parrott W (2001) Emotions in social psychology: essential readings. Psychology Press

  24. Arnold MB (1960) Emotion and personality. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ekman P (1992) An argument for basic emotions. Cognit Emot 6(3-4):169–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Plutchik R. (1980) Emotion: a psychoevolutionary synthesis. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  27. Baccianella S, Esuli A, Sebastiani F (2010) Sentiwordnet 3.0: an enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the international language resources and evaluation conference, vol 10, pp 2200–2204

  28. Mitchell L, Frank MR, Harris KD, Dodds PS, Danforth CM (2013) The geography of happiness: connecting twitter sentiment and expression, demographics, and objective characteristics of place. PLoS ONE 8 (5):1–15,05

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lin Yu-Ru (2014) Assessing sentiment segregation in urban communities. In: Proceedings of the international conference on social computing, pp 9:1–9:8

  30. Fast E, Chen B, Bernstein MS (2016) Empath: Understanding topic signals in large-scale text. In: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’16. ACM, New York, pp 4647–4657

  31. Hamilton WL, Clark K, Leskovec J, Jurafsky D (2016) Inducing domain-specific sentiment lexicons from unlabeled corpora. CoRR, abs/1606.02820

  32. Aslan O, Gunal S, Taner Dincer B (2018) A computational morphological lexicon for turkish: Trlex. Lingua

  33. Mikolov T, Le QV, Sutskever I (2013) Exploiting similarities among languages for machine translation. CoRR, abs/1309.4168

  34. Furini M (2015) Vimood: using social emotions to improve video indexing. In: Proceedings of the 12th international IEEE consumer communications and networking conference

  35. Furini M (2016) On gamifying the transcription of digital video lectures. Entertainment Computing 14:23–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Palazzi CE, Roccetti M, Marfia G (2010) Realizing the unexploited potential of games on serious challenges. Comput Entertain 8(4):23:1–23:4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. De Michele R, Furini M (2016) Understanding the city to make it smart. In: Internet of things, vol 169 of lecture notes of the institute for computer sciences, social informatics and telecommunications engineering, Springer International Publishing

  38. von Ahn L, Dabbish L (2004) Labeling images with a computer game. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pp 319–326

  39. Lux M, Guggenberger M, Riegler M (2014) Picturesort: gamification of image ranking. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on gamification for information retrieval, pp 57–60

  40. Kacorri H, Shinkawa K, Saito S (2014) Introducing game elements in crowdsourced video captioning by non-experts. In: Proceedings of the Web for All conference. ACM, New York, pp 29:1– 29:4

  41. Kaufmann N, Schulze T, Veit DJ (2011) More than fun and money. worker motivation in crowdsourcing — a study on mechanical turk. In: Proceedings of the Americas conference on information Systems

  42. Zheng H, Li D, Hou W (2011) Task design, motivation, and participation in crowdsourcing contests. Int J Electron Commer 15(4):57–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hossain M (2012) Users’ motivation to participate in online crowdsourcing platforms. In: Proceedings of the international conference on innovation management and technology research, pp 310–315

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the students who played the game and the ones who performed the ground-truth and the manual evaluation. The authors wish also to thank the anonymous referees that, with their comments, helped us to improve the readability and the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Furini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Furini, M., Montangero, M. Sentiment analysis and Twitter: a game proposal. Pers Ubiquit Comput 22, 771–785 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-018-1142-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-018-1142-5

Keywords

Navigation