Skip to main content
Log in

Risk factors for limb overgrowth after the application of titanium elastic nailing in the treatment of pediatric femoral fracture

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Orthopaedic Science

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study was to discuss the risk factors of postoperative limb overgrowth after the application of titanium elastic nailing (TEN) in the treatment of pediatric femoral fractures as well as analyze the causes and provide guidance for clinical treatment.

Methods

The study included children with femoral fractures who were treated with TEN at our hospital from February 2005 to December 2009. Their age, gender, weight, cause of injury, having head trauma or not, fracture site, fracture type and nail-canal diameter (NCD) ratio were recorded. Student’s t-test, chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used for univariate analysis of the above factors, and then multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the possible risk factors in order to determine which ones are associated with limb overgrowth after the application of TEN to treat children with femoral fractures.

Results

Univariate analysis showed that the age, gender, weight, cause of injury, having head trauma or not, and the fracture site did not have a statistically significant association with limb overgrowth (P = 0.741, 0.900, 0.253, 0.739, 0.967 and 0.105, respectively). The fracture type and NCD ratio were significantly associated with limb overgrowth (P = 0.003 and 0.000, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the fracture type (P = 0.021, OR = 2.757) and NCD ratio (P = 0.002, OR = 2.422) were independent risk factors for limb overgrowth.

Conclusions

The main factors affecting postoperative limb overgrowth are the fracture type and NCD ratio. In order to avoid limb overgrowth, unstable fractures should be fixed as firmly as possible, and the NCD ratio should be ≥0.8.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Metaizeau JP. L’osteosynthese chez l’enfant par embrochage centromedullaire elastique stable. Montpellier: Sauramps Medical; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ligier JN, Metaizeau JP, Prevot J, Lascombes P. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1988;70(1):74–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bar-On E, Sagiv S, Porat S. External fixation or flexible intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fractures in children. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1997;79(6):975–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Carey TP, Galpin RD. Flexible intramedullary nail fixation of pediatric femoral fractures. Clin Orthop. 1996;332:110–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Flynn JM, Hresko T, Reynolds RA, Blasier RD, Davidson R, Kasser J. Titanium elastic nails for pediatric femur fractures: a multicenter study of early results with analysis of complications. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21(1):4–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heinrich SD, Drvaric DM, Darr K, Darr K, MacEwen GD. The operative stabilization of pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures with flexible intramedullary nails: a prospective analysis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14(4):501–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Beaty JH, Kasser JR. Rockwood and Wilkins fractures in children. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2010. p. 487–532.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Houshian S, Gothgen CB, Pedersen NW, Harving S. Femoral shaft fractures in children: elastic stable intramedullary nailing in 31 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75(3):249–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Flynn JM, Luedtke L, Ganley TJ, Pill SG. Titanium elastic nails for pediatric femur fractures: lessons from the learning curve. Am J Orthop. 2002;31(2):71–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carey RP, de Campo JF, Menelaus MB. Measurement of leg length by computerised tomographic scanography: brief report. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1987;69(5):846–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Schlickewei W, Salm R. Indications for intramedullary stabilization of shaft fractures in childhood. What is reliable, what is assumption?. Kongressbd Dtsch Ges Chir Kongr. 2001;118:431–4.

  12. Luhmann SJ, Schootman M, Schoenecker PL, Dobbs MB, Gordon JE. Complications of titanium elastic nails for pediatric femoral shaft fractures. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;23(4):443–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Flynn JM, Luedtke LM, Ganley TJ, Dawson J, Davidson RS, Dormans JP, Ecker ML, Gregg JR, Horn BD, Drummond DS. Comparison of titanium elastic nails with traction and a spica cast to treat femoral fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 2004;86-A(4):770–7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gogi N, Khan SA, Varshney MK. Limb length discrepancy following titanium elastic nailing in paediatric femoral shaft fractures. Acta Orthop Belg. 2006;72(2):154–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reynolds DA. Growth changes in fractured long-bones: a study of 126 children. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1981;63-B(1):83–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moroz LA, Launay F, Kocher, Newton PO, Frick SL, Sponseller PD, Flynn JM. Titanium elastic nailing of fractures of the femur in children. Predictors of complications and poor outcome. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2006;88(10):1361–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Clement DA, Colton CL. Overgrowth of the femur after fracture in childhood. An increased effect in boys. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1986;68(4):534–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shapiro F. Fractures of the femoral shaft in children. The overgrowth phenomenon. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(6):649–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fakoor M, Mousavi S, Javherizadeh H. Different types of femoral shaft fracture; different types of treatment: their effects on postoperative lower limb discrepancy. Pol Przegl Chir. 2011;83(9):477–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Park SS, Noh H, Kam M. Risk factors for overgrowth after flexible intramedullary nailing for fractures of the femoral shaft in children. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(2):254–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahar A, Sink E, Faro F, Oka R, Newton PO. Differences in biomechanical stability of femur fracture fixation when using titanium nails of increasing diameter. J Child Orthop. 2007;1(3):211–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sink EL, Gralla J, Repine M. Complications of pediatric femur fractures treated with titanium elastic nails: a comparison of fracture types. J Pediatr Orthop. 2005;25(5):577–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liao-Jun Sun.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dai, CQ., Yang, J., Guo, XS. et al. Risk factors for limb overgrowth after the application of titanium elastic nailing in the treatment of pediatric femoral fracture. J Orthop Sci 20, 844–848 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-015-0739-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-015-0739-z

Keywords

Navigation