Comparative study of boil-off gas re-liquefaction processes for liquid ethylene vessels

  • Hongbo Tan
  • Yang Zhang
  • Siyu Shan
  • Qingxuan Zhao
Original article


A re-liquefaction plant is essential for a liquid ethylene gas (LEG) vessel to liquefy the boil-off gas (BOG) and return it to the cargo tank. In this study, three potential BOG re-liquefaction processes for LEG vessels have been compared in terms of coefficient of performance (COP) and exergy efficiency. The effects of the ethylene storage pressure, propane condensing temperature, propane evaporating pressure, intermediate pressures of refrigeration, and liquefaction cycles on the system performances were analysed. The parameters of the processes were optimised individually with the aim to minimise the system power consumption. The results showed that a cascade process denoted as Case-I is superior to other two processes. The optimal COP of Case-I is about 0.767 and the maximum exergy efficiency is 63.1%. This work could provide some reference for selection of the BOG re-liquefaction processes for LEG vessels.


BOG re-liquefaction Liquid ethylene vessels Thermodynamic analysis 



This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), (no. 51306137).


  1. 1.
    Li YJ, Chen XS, Chein MH (2012) Flexible and cost-effective optimization of BOG (boil-off gas) re-condensation process at LNG receiving terminals. Chem Eng Res Des 90:1500–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Park S, Park C, Lee U et al (2014) Comparative study of process integration and retrofit design of a liquefied natural gas (LNG) regasification process based on exergy analyses: a case study of an LNG regasification process in South Korea. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:14366 – 14376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yun S, Ryu J, Seo S et al (2015) Conceptual design of an offshore LNG bunkering terminal: a case study of Busan Port. J Mar Sci Technol 20:226–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li Y, Jin G, Zhong Z (2012) Thermodynamic analysis-based improvement for the boil-off gas re-liquefaction process of liquefied ethylene vessels. Chem Eng Technol 35(10):1759–1764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berlinck EC, Parise JAR, Pitanga Marques R (1997) Numerical simulation of an ethylene re-liquefaction plant. Int J Energy Res 21(7):597–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chien MH, Shih MY (2011) An innovative optimization design for a boil-off gas reliquefaction process of LEG vessels. J Petroleum 47(4):65–74Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ouadha A, Beladjine BM (2015) Exergy analysis of an ethylene BOG re-liquefaction system. In: Proceedings of the 24th IIR International Congress of Refrigeration, Yokohama, Japan, 16–23 Aug 2015Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jeon SH, Kim MS (2015) Compressor selection methods for multi-stage re-liquefaction system of liquefied CO2 transport ship for CCS. Appl Therm Eng 82:360–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Venkatarathnam G (2008) Cryogenic mixed refrigerant processes. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© JASNAOE 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hongbo Tan
    • 1
  • Yang Zhang
    • 1
  • Siyu Shan
    • 1
  • Qingxuan Zhao
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Refrigeration and Cryogenic EngineeringXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anChina

Personalised recommendations