Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical simulation of non-uniform roughness distribution on compressor performance

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 06 March 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

This paper investigated the roughness of NASA Stage 35 test compressor. Surface roughness can change the geometric line in the microcosm, which causes the compressor operation to deviate from the design point under working conditions. Wall function was used in this study to describe roughness. Roughness calculation model in non-uniform distribution was established along the chord and spanwise directions. Basing on certain rules, rotor blades were attached with roughness to determine the influence of blade roughness position distribution on the overall performance of the compressor and internal flow. Results show that when roughness was distributed from the blade leading edge to 40% of the chord, the compressor performance was greatly influenced; in severe performance, compressor efficiency decreased by more than 2%. Roughness position distribution in blade height direction exhibited a minimal effect on the entire compressor performance, which can be ignored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 06 March 2018

    In the original publication there were some corrections to be updated.

Abbreviations

ρ :

Air density

u + :

Near surface velocity

u τ :

Frication velocity

U t :

Tangential velocity

Δy :

Distance to the wall

y + :

Dimensionless distance to the wall

μ :

Viscosity coefficient

A :

Total surface area

τ w :

Wall shear stress

κ :

Constant number of von Karman

C :

Constant number related to roughness

B :

Constant number of rough height

ΔB :

Offset of rough height

h + :

Dimensionless number of roughness

h :

Average roughness of blade surface roughness

h s :

Average of roughness parameters

h + s :

Dimensionless number of h s

ν :

Dynamic viscosity

k s :

Equivalent gravel roughness

\(\bar{k}_{s}\) :

Average roughness

C p :

Pressure coefficient factor C p  = (P 0 − P)/(P 0 − P 2S)

References

  1. Vera M, Zhang XF, Hodson H, Harvey N (2007) Separation and transition control on an aft-loaded ultra-high-lift LP turbine blade at low Reynolds numbers: high-speed validation. J Turbomach Trans ASME 129:340–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Syverud E, Brekke O, Bakken LE (2007) Axial compressor deterioration caused by saltwater ingestion. J Turbomach Trans ASME 129:119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cardwell ND, Sundaram N, Thole KA (2006) Effect of midpassage gap, endwall misalignment, and roughness on endwall film-cooling. J Turbomach Trans ASME 128:62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hummel F, Lotzerich M, Cardamone P, Fottner L (2005) Surface roughness effects on turbine blade aerodynamics. J Turbomach Trans ASME 127:453–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yun YI, Park IY, Song SJ (2005) Performance degradation due to blade surface roughness in a single-stage axial turbine. J Turbomach Trans ASME 127:137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Linden DH (2011) Long term operating experience with corrosion control in industrial axial flow compressors. Proc Fortieth Turbomach Symp 2011:93–106

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lu ML (2013) Research on the effects of salt spray corrosion on the compressor performance. Harbin Engineering University, Harbin

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bons JP (2010) A review of surface roughness effects in gas turbines. J Turbomach Trans ASME 132:16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bons JP, Taylor RP, McClain ST, Rivir RB (2001) The many faces of turbine surface roughness. J Turbomach Trans ASME 123:739–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bons JP (2002) St and c(f) augmentation for real turbine roughness with elevated freestream turbulence. J Turbomach Trans ASME 124:632–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bons JP, McClain ST (2004) The effect of real turbine roughness with pressure gradient on heat transfer. J Turbomach Trans ASME 126:385–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pailhas G, Touvet Y, Aupoix B (2008) Effects of Reynolds number and adverse pressure gradient on a turbulent boundary layer developing on a rough surface. J Turbul 9:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fouflias D, Gannan A, Ramsden K, Pilidis P, Mba D, Teixeira J, Igie U, Lambart P (2010) Experimental investigation of the influence of fouling on compressor cascade characteristics and implications for gas turbine engine performance. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A J Power Energy 224:1007–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Back SC, Jeong IC, Sohn JL, Song SJ (2009) Influence of surface roughness on the performance of a compressor blade in a linear cascade-experiment and modeling. In: Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2009, PTS A and B, New York, vol 7, pp 239–247

  15. Back SC, Hobson GV, Song SJ, Millsaps KT (2010) Effect of surface roughness location and Reynolds number on compressor cascade performance. In: Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2010: turbomachinery: axial flow fan and compressor aerodynamics design methods, and CFD modeling for turbomachinery, PTS A-C, New York, vol 7, pp 121–128

  16. Back SC, Hobson GV, Song SJ, Millsaps KT (2012) Effects of reynolds number and surface roughness magnitude and location on compressor cascade performance. J Turbomach Trans ASME 134:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen SW, Shi H, Zhang C, Wang ST, Wang ZQ (2012) Study on numerical simulation of fouling in compressor rotor. Int J Turbo Jet Engines 29:179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Craft TJ, Gant SE, Iacovides H, Launder BE (2004) A new wall function strategy for complex turbulent flows. Numer Heat Transf Part B Fundam 45:301–318

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Craft TJ, Gant SE, Gerasimov AV, Iacovides H, Launder BE (2006) Development and application of wall-function treatments for turbulent forced and mixed convection flows. Fluid Dyn Res 38:127–144

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Date AW (1995) An introduction to computational fluid dynamics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sigal A, Danberg JE (1990) New correlation of roughness density effect on the turbulent boundary layer. AIAA J 28(3):554–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Reid L, Moore RD (1978) Performance of single-stage axial-flow transonic compressor with rotor and stator aspect ratios of 1.19 and 1.26, respectively, and with design pressure ratio of 1.82. NASA Technical Report No. TP-1338

  23. Brzek BG, Cal RB, Johansson G, Castillo L (2008) Transitionally rough zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. Exp Fluids 44:115–124

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to knowledge the financial assistance from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project 51309063, U1460202) and Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (Project No. 20132304120012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongyi Wang.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, H., Wang, M., Wang, Z. et al. Numerical simulation of non-uniform roughness distribution on compressor performance. J Mar Sci Technol 23, 389–397 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-017-0483-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-017-0483-5

Keywords

Navigation