A universal prototype design framework of the stem and stern contours of hull surface and the self-adaptive solving strategy
- 116 Downloads
Ship geometry reconstruction technology is a key technique and research focus in the ship design. And the optimization algorithm used in the ship design is always a hot research area. To establish the control points’ distribution model database of characteristic curves, based on the NURBS control mesh of the hull surface, an approach to approximate the initial stem and stern contours of hull form modeling using the concept of parametric generation is proposed. The optimization model is constructed with the homogeneous coordinate component of the fitted contour’s control points as the design variables. The objective function is set to minimize the maximum relative difference among the longitudinal coordinates of the approximated contour and the original ones corresponding to the same drafts. The appropriate constraints are set according to the characteristics of the contours and the geometrical characteristic of NURBS. Considering a number of empirical knowledge existing in the process of ship design, and the conventional quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization (QPSO) algorithm depending upon good initial population, the immune quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization (IQPSO) is specifically designed and used to solve this complex nonlinear constrained optimization problem through the immune operator of the immune genetic algorithm combining with the QPSO algorithm. Meanwhile, the self-adaptive constraint evolution strategy is proposed to improve the IQPSO algorithm. The simulation results of the full-scale ship’s contours demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed algorithm and method.
KeywordsHull form Stem and stern contours NURBS Approximation SACES IQPSO
The authors are grateful to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (E091002-51109033) for its financial support.
- 1.Zhao F, Li SZ, Yang L, Liu H (2010) An overview on the design optimization of ship hull based on cfd techniques. J Ship Mech 14(7):812–821Google Scholar
- 5.Pérez FL, Clemente JA, Suárez JA, González JM (2008) Parametric generation, modeling, and fairing of simple hull lines with the use of nonuniform rational B-spline surfaces. J Ship Res 52(1):1–15Google Scholar
- 16.Lu CH, Lin Y, Ji ZS (2007) NURBS approximation of hull waterline based on reduced control points number with adaptive genetic algorithm. J Dalian Univ Technol 47(6):846Google Scholar
- 17.Lu CH, Zhang YR, Lin Y (2014) Representation for characteristic curves of hull form using immune genetic algorithm based on NURBS with path curve parameterization method. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Ocean and polar engineering conference ISOPE, Busan, Korea, pp 731–737Google Scholar
- 20.Sun J, Feng B, Xu WB (2004) Particle swarm optimization with particles having quantum behavior. In: Proceedings of the 2004 congress on evolutionary computation, CEC2004, pp 325–331Google Scholar
- 21.Sun J, Xu WB, Feng B (2004) A global search strategy of quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization. In: Cybernetics and intelligent systems, 2004 IEEE Conference, vol 1. IEEE, pp 111–116Google Scholar
- 22.Sun J, Xu WB, Feng B (2005) Adaptive parameter control for quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization on individual level. In: 2005 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, vol 4. IEEE, pp 3049–3054Google Scholar
- 27.Gao W (2008) Study on improved fast immunized genetic algorithm. In: Genetic and evolutionary computing, 2008. WGEC’08. Second international conference. IEEE, pp 55–58Google Scholar
- 29.Parsopoulos KE, Vrahatis MN (2002) Particle swarm optimization method for constrained optimization problems. Intelligent technologies-theory and application: new trends in intelligent technologies. IOS Press, Fairfax, pp 214–220Google Scholar
- 30.Hu X, Eberhart R (2002) Solving constrained nonlinear optimization problems with particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the sixth world multiconference on systemics, cybernetics and informatics, vol 5, pp 203–206Google Scholar