Dynamic behaviors of a marine riser with variable length during the installation of a subsea production tree
- 149 Downloads
In subsea production tree (SPT) installation, the length of risers is time variable. To analyze the dynamic behaviors of risers, a novel analysis model with varying riser length had been established at two installation stages, and a Keller-box method was subtly applied to solve the differential control equations of riser with varying lengths. Specifically, the riser was discretized into multiple rigid segments, and the dynamic model was established under different boundary conditions at two stages. With a transformation between two adjacent segments to vary the length of the riser, the model was calculated. The upper-end tension and lower-end displacement with different launch velocities were studied in the time domain. Moreover, the influences of the drag coefficient, wind velocity, tide velocity, and SPT weight on the stress and lateral displacement of the riser were also discussed. Then, some interesting and meaningful conclusions were found, such as a launch velocity keeping at ~1.5 m/s was the better choice, the effect of the normal drag coefficient weakens as its value increases, a larger value of the tide velocity yields a smaller depth of the maximum displacement point, and so on. This work was not only used for guiding the installation of SPT, but also could provide a new method to research the slender with variable length.
KeywordsMarine riser Varying length Displacement Stress Finite difference approximation (FDA)
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No. 51279107 and No. 41527901) and the Research Fund for Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (STCSM, No. 13dz1204600).
- 1.Gardner TN, Kotch MA (1976) Dynamic analysis of riser and caissons by the element method. OTC 2651:405–413Google Scholar
- 2.Patel MH, Sarohia S (1983) Dynamic response of free hanging risers in waves. Proc Int Offshore Mech Arctic Eng Symp 1:455–470Google Scholar
- 4.Azpiazu W et al (1983) Heave compensation system: analysis and results of field testing. In: 15th annual OTC conference, OTC vol 4561, pp 417–421Google Scholar
- 8.Moreira JRF, Johansen TE (2001) Installation of subsea trees in Roncador field, at 1800 m water depth using the drill pipe riser. OTC 13256Google Scholar
- 9.Voss R, Moore T (2003) Subsea tree installation, lessons learned on a West Africa development. OTC 15371Google Scholar
- 10.Carre D, Osullivan J (2009) Subsea production system experience. OTC 20280Google Scholar
- 11.Lin XJ, Xiao WS, Wang HY (2011) Drill string mechanical analysis of running deep-water oil tree. J China Univ Petrol 35(5):125–129Google Scholar
- 12.Gong MX, Liu ZS, Duan ML, Wang JG, Zhang MH (2013) Research on the running installment process of deep sea underwater Christmas tree. China Petrol Mach 41(4):50–54Google Scholar
- 22.Zhou J (2001) The research on drilling riser system of offshore deep water. Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, pp 39–40Google Scholar
- 25.Techet AH (2004) Design principles for ocean vehicles [M]. MIT, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar