Advertisement

Journal of Marine Science and Technology

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 228–235 | Cite as

Operational noise associated with underwater sound emitting vessels and potential effect of oceanographic conditions: a Dublin Bay port area study

  • Oshoke W. Ikpekha
  • Asmaa Eltayeb
  • Aditya Pandya
  • Stephen Daniels
Original article
  • 140 Downloads

Abstract

This study presents analysis of acoustic data of underwater sound emitting vessels (USEV) recorded during operation in the Dublin Bay port area. Investigations were carried out to assess the magnitudes of these underwater sounds, and also the potential effect of changes in tidal states on these sound signals and their propagation. Power spectral densities (PSD) and 1/3 octave band sound pressure levels (SPL) were computed for frequencies between 50–500 and 50–1000 Hz, respectively. During the presence of these vessels in the study site, broadband SPL values for a range of frequency components were calculated to be between 94 and 121 dB (re 1 µPa) at a distance of 200 m from the vessels. These values decreased by 5–21 dB during their absence. The strongest sound level recorded at this site was during the departure of vessels from the dock at 200 m from the recording system. The SPL value calculated during this operational period at 315 Hz frequency was 121 dB re 1 µPa2/Hz. Associated components’ spectral of the vessels were identified, and the effect of difference in heights of tidal ranges (Neap/Spring) on this site was investigated.

Keywords

Underwater acoustics Shipping noise Fast Fourier transform Sound pressure level Power spectral density Sound propagation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

O. Ikpekha and S. Daniels specifically acknowledge the Irish Research Council (IRC) for funding this project. A. Eltayeb and S. Daniels thank the postgraduate funding support from INSPIRE (Irish government’s PRTLI cycle 5, national development plan 2007–2013—European regional development fund).

References

  1. 1.
    Gloza I (2009) Ship’s underwater noise measurements using sound intensity method. Hydroacoustics 12:53–60Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Broudic M, Croft N, Willis M, Masters I, Sei-Him C (2014) Comparison of underwater background noise during Spring and Neap tide in a high tidal current site: Ramsey Sound. In: Proceedings of meetings on acoustics, vol. 17, no. 1, p 070104Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Willis MR, Broudic M, Haywood C, Masters I, Thomas S (2013) Measuring underwater background noise in high tidal flow environments. Renew Energy 49:255–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Willis MR, Broudic I, Masters I (2011) Ambient underwater noise in high and low energy flow conditions. In: 4th Wind Turbine Noise Conference 2011 (WTNC 2011), Rome, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bassett C, Thomson J, Polagye B, Rhinefrank K (2011) Underwater noise measurements of a 1/7 th scale wave energy converter. In: OCEANS 2011, IEEE. pp 1–6Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ikpekha OW, Soberon F, Daniels S (2014) Modelling the propagation of underwater acoustic signals of a marine energy device using finite element method. In: Presented at the international conference on renewable energies and power quality, Cordoba, Spain, 2014Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mazzuca LL (2001) Potential effects of low frequency sound (LFS) from commercial vessels on large whales. Thesis Submitted to University of WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McKenna MF, Ross D, Wiggins SM, Hildebrand JA (2012) Underwater radiated noise from modern commercial ships. J Acoust Soc Am 131(1):92–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pricop M, Chitac V, Gheorghe F, Papzara T, Oncica V, Atodiresei D (2010) Underwater radiated noise of ships’ machinery in shallow water. In: Conference on manufacturing engineering, quality and production systems, Romania, 2010Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee S, Lee Y, Kim S, Park J, Rak J (2010). Measurement of low frequency ambient noise using screened hydrophone in shallow water. In: Proceedings of symposium on ultrasonic electronics, vol. 31, no. 2010, pp 421–422Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hildebrand J (2004) Sources of anthropogenic sound in the marine environment. In: Report to the policy on sound and marine mammals: an international workshop. US Marine Mammal Commission and Joint Nature Conservation Committee, UK. London, England, 2004Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McKenna MF, Wiggins SM, Hildebrand JA (2013) Relationship between container ship underwater noise levels and ship design, operational and oceanographic conditions. Sci Rep 3:1760. doi: 10.1038/srep01760 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Würsig B, Greene C Jr (2002) Underwater sounds near a fuel receiving facility in western Hong Kong: relevance to dolphins. Mar Environ Res 54(2):129–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Erbe C, McCauley R, McPherson C, Gavrilov A (2013) Underwater noise from offshore oil production vessels. J Acoust Soc Am 133(6):EL465–EL470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hildebrand JA (2009) Anthropogenic and natural sources of ambient noise in the ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 395:5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Briciu-Burghina C, Sullivan T, Chapman J, Regan F (2014) Continuous high-frequency monitoring of estuarine water quality as a decision support tool: a Dublin Port case study. Environ Monit Assess 186:5561–5580. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-3803-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bedri Z, Bruen M, Dowley A, Masterson B (2013) Environmental consequences of a power plant shut-down: a three-dimensional water quality model of Dublin Bay. Mar Pollut Bull 71(1):117–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Proakis JG, Sozer EM, Rice JA, Stojanovic M (2001) Shallow water acoustic networks. Commun Mag IEEE 39(11):114–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Purcell M, Vasudevan A, Gregg D (2012) Real-time sensor signal capture from a harsh environment. In: Distributed simulation and real time applications (DS-RT), 2012 IEEE/ACM 16th international symposium on, 2012, IEEE. pp 36–43Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kolar H et al (2013) The design and deployment of a real-time wide spectrum acoustic monitoring system for the ocean energy industry. In: OCEANS-Bergen, 2013 MTS/IEEE, IEEE, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jensen F, Kuperman W, Porter M, Schmidt H, Tolstoy A (2008) Computational ocean acoustics. Phys Today 47(11):91–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nedwell J (2010) Measurements of baseline underwater noise and vibration in Sruwaddacon Bay, Co. Mayo, Eire, Subacoustech Enviromental Report No. E270R103, ed, 21 Aug 2010Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zak A (2011) Ship’s hydroacoustics signatures classification using neural networks. In: Mwasiagi JI (ed) Self organizing maps—applications and novel algorithms design. INTECH, Rijeka, CroatiaGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Farcas A, Thompson PM, Merchant ND (2016) Underwater noise modelling for environmental impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 57:114–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© JASNAOE 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Energy and Design Lab, School of Electronic EngineeringDublin City UniversityDublin 9Ireland
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsRyerson UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations