Skip to main content
Log in

Quality system implementation in the National Metrology Institute of Montenegro

  • Practitioner's Report
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accreditation of calibration laboratories is a means for achieving competence recognition and assuring customers that their calibration services are accurate and reliable. Moreover, it is a powerful tool for a National Metrology Institute (NMI), enabling the formal acceptance of its measurement results. It could be especially useful when calibration activities are performed in well-developed laboratories, which have participated successfully in interlaboratory comparisons but have been awaiting the publication of Calibration and Measurement Capabilities in the BIPM Key comparison database. This paper describes establishment and implementation of a quality management system in the NMI of Montenegro called Bureau of Metrology (MBM) that complies with ISO/IEC 17025. We have presented the results of the first audit evaluation, corrective actions, preparation of quality management documentation, measurement traceability, as well as advantages of being accredited. Our experience of implementing ISO/IEC 17025 for the accreditation of national calibration laboratories established within the MBM shows that strategic planning, establishment of long-term objectives, as well as the commitment to fulfilling standard requirements are the basis for acceptable calibration results. International acceptance of confidence and reliability of calibration services and measurement results provided by the MBM laboratories represents a useful marketing tool for promoting the image of the institution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (2011) Joint BIPM, OIML, ILAC and ISO declaration on metrological traceability. http://www.bipm.org/en/worldwide-metrology/bipm-oiml-ilac-iso_joint_declaration.html. Accessed 17 Feb 2017

  2. CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement-CIPM MRA (1999, rev. 2003) Mutual recognition of national measurement standards and of calibration and measurement certificates issued by national metrology institutes. http://www.bipm.org/en/cipm-mra/cipm-mra-text/. Accessed 17 Feb 2017

  3. International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation-ILAC (2015) The ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement. http://ilac.org/publications-and-resources/ilac-promotional-brochures/. Accessed 19 Feb 2017

  4. De Nadai F et al (2006) Quality system implementation in a Brazilian university laboratory. Accred Qual Assur 10:594–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zapata-García D, Llauradó M, Rauret G (2007) Experience of implementing ISO 17025 for the accreditation of a university testing laboratory. Accred Qual Assur 12:317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grochau IH et al (2010) Implementation of a quality management system in university test laboratories: a brief review and new proposals. Accred Qual Assur 15:681–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grochau IH, ten Caten CS (2012) A process approach to ISO/IEC 17025 in the implementation of a quality management system in testing laboratories. Accred Qual Assur 17:519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Iacob E (2016) Experience of accreditation in a surface science laboratory. Accred Qual Assur 21:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Biasini V (2012) Implementation of a quality management system in a public research centre. Accred Qual Assur 17:621–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lopes I et al (2014) Implementation of the quality management system at the Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Safety (LPSR) in Portugal. Accred Qual Assur 19:355–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. ISO, IEC 17025 (2005) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  12. David FR (2011) Strategic management: concepts and cases. Prentice Hall, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schermerhorn JR Jr (2012) Exploring management. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  14. Steindl et al (2012) Final Report on EURAMET key comparison (EURAMET.M.M-K4.2 and EURAMET.M.M-K2.2) of 1 kg and submultiples of the kilogram standards in stainless steel (project code: EURAMET 1120). Metrologia 49:07005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vámossy C et al (2015) Final Report on EURAMET key comparison (EURAMET.M.M-K.2.5) of 10 kg mass standards in stainless steel (project code: EURAMET 1222). Metrologia 52:07001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. EURAMET (2013) EURAMET project 1265: Peer review of quality management system of Montenegrin Bureau of Metrology. https://www.euramet.org/technical-committees/tc-q/tc-q-projects/. Accessed 11 Mar 2017

  17. ISO/IEC Guide 98–3 (2008) Uncertainty of measurement—part 3: guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995). International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  18. EA 4/02 M rev01 (2013) Evaluation of the uncertainty of measurement in calibration. European Co-operation for Accreditation, Paris

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanja Asanovic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Asanovic, V., Raonic, M., Cuturic-Knezevic, N. et al. Quality system implementation in the National Metrology Institute of Montenegro. Accred Qual Assur 23, 87–96 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-017-1303-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-017-1303-7

Keywords

Navigation