The prevalence and incidence of perinatal anxiety disorders among women experiencing a medically complicated pregnancy
Over 20% of pregnancies involve medical difficulties that pose some threat to the health and well-being of the mother, her developing infant, or both. We report on the first comparison of the prevalence and incidence of maternal anxiety disorders (AD) in pregnancy and the postpartum, across levels of medical risk in pregnancy. Pregnant women (N = 310) completed postnatal screening measures for anxiety. Women who scored at or above cutoff on one or more of the screening measures were administered a diagnostic interview (n = 115) for AD. Pregnancies were classified into low, moderate, or high risk based on self-report and contact with high-risk maternity clinics. The incidence of AD in pregnancy was higher among women classified as experiencing a medically moderate or high-risk pregnancy, compared with women classified as experiencing a medically low-risk pregnancy. Across risk groups, there were no differences in AD prevalence or in the incidence of AD in the postpartum. Demographic characteristics and parity did not contribute meaningfully to outcomes. Pregnancies characterized by medical risks are associated with an increased likelihood of new onset AD. Women experiencing medically complex pregnancies should be screened for anxiety and offered appropriate treatment.
KeywordsAnxiety/anxiety disorders Medically high-risk pregnancy Epidemiology Pregnancy and postpartum
We would like to express our immense gratitude to the study participants for their generous contribution of time and effort. We would also like to thank all of our staff and volunteers for their effort and dedication to the project.
Compliance with ethical standards
Funding/conflict of interest
This research was funded by the Auxiliary to BC Women’s Hospital & Health Centre in a 2007 Funding Competition and awarded to Dr. Nichole Fairbrother. None of the authors listed on this manuscript have any affiliations, personal relationships, or financial involvement with any person or organization that places them in a position of conflict of interest with respect to the submitted materials.
- Ahmad TFE, Suleiman R, Shougah D (1994) Mixed anxiety depression in pregnancy (the influence of misconceptions). Arab Journal of Psychiatry 5(2):103–113Google Scholar
- Beauquier-Maccotta B, Chalouhi GE, Picquet A, Carrier A, Bussières L, Golse B, Ville Y (2016) Impact of monochorionicity and twin to twin transfusion syndrome on prenatal attachment, post traumatic stress disorder, anxiety and depressive symptoms. Public Library of Science One 11(1):e0145649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145649 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Besser A, Priel B, Flett GL, Wiznitzer A (2007) Linear and nonlinear models of vulnerability to depression: personality and postpartum depression in a high-risk population. Individual Differences Research 5:1–29Google Scholar
- Coplan RJ, O’Neil K, Arbeau KA (2005) Maternal anxiety during and after pregnancy and infant temperament at three months of age. Journal of Prenatal and Perinatal Psychology and Health 19(3):199–215Google Scholar
- First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW (1996) Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders.Google Scholar
- Garret C (1999) Assessment for risk factors. In: Loudermilk D, Perry S, Bobak I (eds) Maternity nursing, 5th edn. Mosby, Chicago, p 578Google Scholar
- Manassis K, Bradley S, Goldberg S, Hood J, Swinson RP (1995) Behavioral-inhibition, attachment and anxiety in children in mothers with anxiety disorders. Can J Psychiat 40(2):87–92Google Scholar
- Molina S, Borkovec TD (1994) The Penn State Worry Questionnaire: psychometric properties and associated characteristics. In: Graham D, Tallis F (eds) Worrying: perspectives on theory, assessment and treatment. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Perinatal Services BC (PSBC) (2012) Maternal and Fetal Levels of Service Classification Tool. Available from: http://www.perinatalservicesbc.ca/Documents/Resources/Classifications/MaternalFetal/ToolMaternalFetalLOSClassification.pdf
- Queenan JT (1985) Management of high-risk pregnancy. Medical Economics Company, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- Simpson W, Glazer M, Michalski N, Steiner M, Frey BN (2014) Comparative efficacy of the generalized anxiety disorder 7-item scale and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as screening tools for generalized anxiety disorder in pregnancy and the postpartum period. Can J Psychiat 59(8):434–440Google Scholar
- The British Columbia Perinatal Database Registry (BCPDR) (2005) British Columbia Reproductive Care Program—April 1, 2003 to March 31, 2004: British Columbia deliveries by maternal residence and delivery hospital highest level of service/care. Available at: http://www.perinatalservicesbc.ca/NR/rdonlyres/5496D280-B630-4390-86AB-DE0EC09E5282/0/SurveillanceTableMaternalResidence20032004.pdf.
- Weathers FW, Litz BT, Herman DS, Huska JA, Keane TM (1993). The PTSD Checklist (PCL): reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, San Antonio, TXGoogle Scholar