The effects of acute leucine or leucine–glutamine co-ingestion on recovery from eccentrically biased exercise
This study investigated the effects of leucine or leucine + glutamine supplementation on recovery from eccentric exercise. In a double-blind independent groups design, 23 men were randomly assigned to a leucine (0.087 g/kg; n = 8), leucine + glutamine (0.087 g/kg + glutamine 0.3 g/kg; n = 8) or placebo (0.3 g/kg maltodextrin; n = 7) group. Participants performed 5 sets of drop jumps, with each set comprising 20 repetitions. Isometric knee-extensor strength, counter-movement jump (CMJ) height, delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) and creatine kinase (CK) were measured at baseline, 1, 24, 48 h and 72 h post-exercise. There was a time × group interaction for isometric strength, CMJ and CK (P < 0.05), with differences between the leucine + glutamine and placebo group at 48 h and 72 h for strength (P = 0.013; d = 1.43 and P < 0.001; d = 2.06), CMJ (P = 0.008; d = 0.87 and P = 0.019; d = 1.17) and CK at 24 h (P = 0.012; d = 0.54) and 48 h (P = 0.010; d = 1.37). The leucine group produced higher strength at 72 h compared to placebo (P = 0.007; d = 1.65) and lower CK at 24 h (P = 0.039; d = 0.63) and 48 h (P = 0.022; d = 1.03). Oral leucine or leucine + glutamine increased the rate of recovery compared to placebo after eccentric exercise. These findings highlight potential benefits of co-ingesting these amino acids to ameliorate recovery.
KeywordsAmino acids Muscle damage Recovery Supplementation Exercise
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study
- Churchward-Venne TA, Breen L, Di Donato DM, Hector AJ, Mitchell CJ, Moore DR et al (2014) Leucine supplementation of a low-protein mixed macronutrient beverage enhances myofibrillar protein synthesis in young men: a double-blind, randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr 99:276–286CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cruzat VF, Rogero MM, Tirapegui J. (2010). Effects of supplementation with free glutamine and the dipeptide alanyl-glutamine on parameters of muscle damage and inflammation in rats submitted to prolonged exercise. Cell Biochem Funct 28: 24–30Google Scholar
- Howatson G, Hoad M, Goodall S, Tallent J, Bell PG, French DN (2012) Exercise-induced muscle damage is reduced in resistance-trained males by branched chain amino acids: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 9:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1550-2783-9-20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kephart WC, Mumford PW, McCloskey AE et al (2016) Post-exercise branched chain amino acid supplementation does not affect recovery markers following three consecutive high intensity resistance training bouts compared to carbohydrate supplementation. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 13:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12970-016-0142-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- McGlory C, Devries MC, Phillips SM (2017) Skeletal muscle and resistance exercise training; the role of protein synthesis in recovery and remodeling. J Appl Phys 122:541–548Google Scholar
- Nicastro H, Ribeiro da Luz C, Chaves D, Bechara LRG, Voltarelli VA, Rogero M et al (2012) Does branched-chain amino acids supplementation modulate skeletal muscle remodeling through inflammation modulation? possible mechanisms of action. J Nutr Metab. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/136937 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar