Acta Mechanica

, Volume 229, Issue 6, pp 2657–2673 | Cite as

A fast meshfree technique for the coupled thermoelasticity problem

  • Kourosh Hasanpour
  • Davoud Mirzaei
Original Paper


This paper concerns a new and fast meshfree method for the linear coupled thermoelasticity problem. The resulting algorithm provides an attractive alternative to existing mesh-based and meshfree methods. Compared with mesh-based methods, the proposed technique inherits the advantages of meshfree methods allowing the use of scattered points instead of a predefined mesh. Compared with the existing meshfree methods, the proposed technique is truly meshless, requiring no background mesh for both trial and test spaces and, more importantly, numerical integrations are done over low-degree polynomials rather than complicated shape functions. In fact, this method mimics the known advantages of both meshless and finite element methods, where in the former triangulation is not required for approximation and in the latter the stiffness and mass matrices are set up by integration against simple polynomials. The numerical results of the present work concern the thermal and mechanical shocks in a finite domain considering classical coupled theory of thermoelasticity.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Apostolakis, G., Dargush, G.F.: Variational methods in irreversible thermoelasticity: theoretical developments and minimum principles for the discrete form. Acta Mech. 224, 2065–2088 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atluri, S.N., Shen, S.: The Meshless Local Petrov–Galerkin (MLPG) Method. Tech Science Press, Encino (2002)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belytschko, T., Krongauz, Y., Organ, D., Fleming, M., Krysl, P.: Meshless methods: an overview and recent developments. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 139, 3–47 (1996)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bobaru, F., Mukhrejee, S.: Meshless approach to shape optimization of linear thermoelastic solids. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 53, 765–796 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carter, J.P., Booker, J.R.: Finite element analysis of coupled thermoelasticity. Comput. Struct. 31, 73–80 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, J., Dargush, G.F.: BEM for dynamic proelastic and thermoelastic analysis. Int. J. Solids Struct. 32, 2257–2278 (1995)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ching, H.K., Yen, S.C.: Transient thermoelastic deformations of 2-D functionally graded beams under nonuniformly convective heat supply. Compos. Struct. 73, 381–393 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hetnarski, R.B., Eslami, M.R.: Thermal Stresses: Advanced Theory and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2009)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoghes, T., Pister, K., Taylor, R.: Implicit-explicit finite elements in nonlinear transient analysis. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 17–18, Part 1, 159–182 (1979)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hosseini-Tehrani, P., Eslami, M.R.: BEM analysis of thermal and mechanical shock in a two-dimensional finite domain considering coupled thermoelasticity. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 24, 249–257 (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jabbari, M., Eslami, M., Dehbani, H.: An exact solution for classic coupled thermoelasticity in spherical coordinates. J. Press. Vessel Technol. 31, 31201–31211 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jabbari, M., Eslami, M., Dehbani, H.: An exact solution for classic coupled thermoelasticity in cylindrical coordinates. J. Press. Vessel Technol. 133, 051,204 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mirzaei, D.: A new low-cost meshfree method for two and three dimensional problems in elasticity. Appl. Math. Model. 39, 7181–7196 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mirzaei, D., Hasanpour, K.: Direct meshless local Petrov–Galerkin method for elastodynamic analysis. Acta Mech. 227, 619–632 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mirzaei, D., Schaback, R.: Direct meshless local Petrov–Galerkin (DMLPG) method: a generalized MLS approximation. Appl. Numer. Math. 33, 73–82 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mirzaei, D., Schaback, R., Dehghan, M.: On generalized moving least squares and diffuse derivatives. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 32, 983–1000 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nickell, R.E., Sackman, J.J.: Approximate solutions in linear, coupled thermoelasticity. J. Appl. Mech. 35, 255–266 (1968)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nowacki, W.: Thermo-Elasticity, 2nd edn. Pergamon Press, New York (1986)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Prevost, J.H., Tao, D.: Finite element analysis of dynamic coupled thermoelasticity problems with relaxation times. J. Appl. Mech. Trans. ASME 50, 817–822 (1983)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Qian, L.F., Batra, R.C.: Transient thermoelastic deformations of thick functionally graded plate. J. Therm. Stresses 27, 705–740 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Shahani, A.R., Bashusqeh, S.M.: Analytical solution of the coupled thermo-elasticity problem in a pressurized sphere. J. Therm. Stresses 36, 1283–1307 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shahani, A.R., Bashusqeh, S.M.: Analytical solution of the thermoelasticity problem in a pressurized thickwalled sphere subjected to transient thermal loading. Math. Mech. Solids 19, 135–151 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sladek, J., Sladek, V., Atluri, S.N.: A pure contour formulation for meshless local boundary integral equation method in thermoelasticity. CMES-Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 2, 423–434 (2001)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sladek, J., Sladek, V., Solek, P., Tan, C.L., Zhang, C.: Two- and three-dimensional transient thermoelastic analysis by the MLPG method. CMES-Comput. Model. Eng. Sci. 47, 61–95 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sladek, V., Sladek, J.: Boundary integral equation method in thermoelasticity, part I: general analysis. Appl. Math. Model. 7, 241–253 (1984)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Suh, I.G., Tosaka, N.: Application of the boundary elment method to three dimensioanl linear coupled thermoelasticity problems. Theor. Appl. Mech. 38, 169–175 (1989)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tamma, K.K., Railkar, S.B.: On heat displacement based hybrid transfinite element formulations for uncoupled/coupled thermally induced stress wave propagation. J. Comput. Struct. 30, 1025–1036 (1988)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tanaka, M., Tanaka, K.: A boundary element approach to dynamic problems in coupled thermoelasticity. SM Arch. 6, 467–491 (1981)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ting, E.C., Chen, H.C.: A unified numerical approach for thermal stress waves. Comput. Struct. 15, 165–175 (1982)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tosaka, N., Suh, I.G.: Boundary elment analysis of dynamic coupled thermoelasticity problems. Comput. Mech. 8, 331–342 (1991)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wagner, P.: Fundamental matrix of the system of dynamic linear thermoelasticity. J. Therm. Stresses 17, 549–565 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wendland, H.: Scattered Data Approximation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zheng, B.J., Gao, X.W., Kai, Y., Zhang, C.Z.: A novel meshless local Petrov–Galerkin method for dynamic coupled thermoelasticity analysis under thermal and mechanical shock loading. Eng. Anal. Bound. Elem. 60, 145–161 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of IsfahanIsfahanIran
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUniversity of IsfahanIsfahanIran
  3. 3.Department of MathematicsKhansar Faculty of Mathematics and Computer ScienceKhansarIran

Personalised recommendations