Skip to main content
Log in

Combined cervical laminoplasty and foraminotomy for coexistence of cervical myelopathy and unilateral radiculopathy: case series and preliminary results

  • Technical Note - Spine - Other
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The clinical outcomes and radiographic changes of a one-stage procedure combining cervical laminoplasty and unilateral cervical foraminotomy for patients with coexisting cervical myelopathy and unilateral radiculopathy were evaluated.

Methods

Seven patients (two females and five males) with coexisting cervical myelopathy and unilateral cervical radiculopathy were included in this study. The mean age was 58.4 years (range 45–77 years). Cervical laminoplasty and unilateral cervical foraminotomy were performed on the recruited patients in a single stage. The quantitative clinical changes between the preoperative and 6-month postoperative assessment were analyzed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, the JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOA-CMEQ), visual analog scale (VAS), and Neck Disability Index (NDI). Moreover, the preoperative and 6-month postoperative radiographic changes were assessed using the C2-7 angle and range of motion (ROM) between flexion and extension angle.

Results

There were significant differences in QOL in the JOA-CMEQ between the groups. Furthermore, the postoperative VAS values in the arms and hands generally improved, although not significantly, between the groups.

Conclusions

The aforementioned surgical procedure may be safe and efficient for patients with coexisting cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Data availability

The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.

References

  1. Baba H, Chen Q, Uchida K, Imura S, Morikawa S, Tomita K (1996) Laminoplasty with foraminotomy for coexisting cervical myelopathy and unilateral radiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:196–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Edwards CC II, Riew KD, Anderson PA, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AF (2003) Cervical myelopathy: current diagnostic and treatment strategies. Spine J 3:68–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein NE (2002) A review of laminoforaminotomy for the management of lateral and foraminal cervical disc herniations or spurs. Surg Neurol 57:226–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG, Smisson HF, Johnston KW, Grigorian AA et al (2007) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2310–2317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Goto T, Ohata K, Takami T, Nishikawa M, Tsuyuguchi N, Morino M et al (2002) Hydroxyapatite laminar spacers and titanium miniplates in cervical laminoplasty. J Neurosurg 97:323–329

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y, Chiba K (1999) Expansive laminoplasty for myelopathy in ossification of the longitudinal ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 359:35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kihara SI, Umebayashi T, Hoshimaru M (2005) Technical improvements and results of open-door expansive laminoplasty with hydroxyapatite implants for cervical myelopathy. Neurosurg 57:348–356

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu WJ, Hu L, Chou PH, Wang JW, Kan WS (2016) Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review. Orthop Surg 8:425–431

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Marcó del Pont F, Giovannini SJM, Ries Centeno T, Caffaratti G, Lorefice E, Cervio A (2021) Cervical laminoplasty with unilateral C4–5 foraminotomy: technical note and case series. Neurocir (English Ed) 32:224–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Ishii T, Yoshikawa H (2003) C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:2447–2451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sasai K, Saito T, Akagi S, Kato I, Ohnari H, Iida H (2003) Preventing C5 palsy after laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1972–1977

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Selvanathan SK, Beagrie C, Thomson S, Corns R, Deniz K, Derham C et al (2015) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior cervical foraminotomy in the treatment of brachialgia: the Leeds spinal unit experience (2008–2013). Acta Neurochir (Wien) 157:1595–1600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tani S, Isoshima A, Nagashima Y, Numoto RT, Abe T (2002) Laminoplasty with preservation of posterior cervical elements: surgical technique. Neurosurg 50:97–101

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang T, Tian XM, Liu SK, Wang H, Zhang YZ, Ding WY (2017) Prevalence of complications after surgery in treatment for cervical compressive myelopathy: a meta-analysis for last decade. Med (United States) 96:e6421

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang T, Wang H, Liu S, Ding WY (2017) Incidence of C5 nerve root palsy after cervical surgery. Med (United States) 96:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yamasaki Y, Takeuchi K, Numasawa T, Wada K, Itabashi T, Kumagai G et al (2021) Can prophylactic C4/5 foraminotomy prevent C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty with and without posterior instrumented fusion with maximal expansion? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 31:1037–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoshioka N, Takayama M, Kobayashi T, Murai N, Ioroi Y (2020) Neurological disturbance of the upper extremities after cervical laminoplasty: a morphological assessment focused on the intervertebral foramen. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 45:E1549–E1555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshinari Kawasaki.

Ethics declarations

Research involving human participants and informed consent

The study was conducted ethically and in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. This study protocol was reviewed and approval by hospital ethics committee, approval number 106. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Spine—Other

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kawasaki, T., Takayama, M., Maki, Y. et al. Combined cervical laminoplasty and foraminotomy for coexistence of cervical myelopathy and unilateral radiculopathy: case series and preliminary results. Acta Neurochir 165, 789–795 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05519-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05519-4

Keywords

Navigation