Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Minimally invasive foramen magnum decompression using tubular retractors (MIFT) for Chiari I malformations

  • How I Do it - Spine - Other
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

Chiari malformation type 1 has been traditionally treated with foramen magnum decompression and C1 arch excision with or without duroplasty depending on the surgeon’s preference. Each of the various surgical modifications has its advantages and disadvantages.

Methods

We describe a minimally invasive tubular retractor-based approach to achieve bony decompression in these cases. We have had good results comparable to the open approach.

Conclusions

Strict orientation to the midline using soft tissue landmarks in between the muscles and bony landmarks in the deeper planes is important to achieve good surgical results. Operative time decreases with expertise and is comparable to the open technique. Minimal blood loss and decreased hospital stay and an excellent cosmetic scar make this procedure more appealing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available within the article. Any further information regarding the article are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Asghar Ali Turabi MA, Pruthi N, Bhat D, Bhagavatula ID (2021) Complex Chiari malformation: proposal of a new set of diagnostic criteria and outcomes after fusion surgery. World Neurosurg 154:e677–e682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Badie B, Mendoza D, Batzdorf U (1995) Posterior fossa volume and response to suboccipital decompression in patients with Chiari I malformation. Neurosurgery 37(2):214–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard S, Loukas M, Rizk E, Oskouian RJ, Delashaw J, Shane Tubbs R (2015) The human occipital bone: review and update on its embryology and molecular development. Childs Nerv Syst 31(12):2217–2223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gandhi RH, German JW (2013) Minimally invasive approach for the treatment of intradural spinal pathology. FOC 35(2):E5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gardner WJ (1965) Hydrodynamic mechanism of syringomyelia: its relationship to myelocele. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 28(3):247–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Goel A (2015) Is atlantoaxial instability the cause of Chiari malformation? Outcome analysis of 65 patients treated by atlantoaxial fixation. SPI 22(2):116–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mandel M, Ferreira da Silva IA, Paiva W, Li Y, Steinberg GK, Teixeira MJ (2020) Minimally invasive foramen magnum durectomy and obexostomy for treatment of craniocervical junction–related syringomyelia in adults: case series and midterm follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 33(2):148–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tubbs RS, Beckman J, Naftel RP, Chern JJ, Wellons JC, Rozzelle CJ, Blount JP, Oakes WJ (2011) Institutional experience with 500 cases of surgically treated pediatric Chiari malformation Type I: Clinical article. PED 7(3):248–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tyagi G, Singh GJ, Beniwal M, Srinivas D (2021) Management of a persistent oblique occipital sinus with staged ligation in a case of medulloblastoma: a case report. Pediatr Neurosurg 56(5):460–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zagzoog N, Reddy (Kesh) K (2019) Use of minimally invasive tubular retractors for foramen magnum decompression of Chiari malformation: a technical note and case series. World Neurosurg 128:248–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alok Mohan Uppar.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in the current study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was taken from the patient and family before the procedure, including the use of anonymized patient data (clinical and radiological) for scientific research and publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key points summary

1. Mild flexion of the head while positioning helps in opening the space between the foramen magnum and the C1 arch.

2. Perpendicularly placed bored needles are important to plan incisions using lateral fluoroscopy.

3. Extremely important to stay in the midline to avoid false tracking and improper bony work.

4. Midline ridge on the C1 arch and occipital bone act as good landmarks to orient the surgeon toward the midline.

5. An incision with a knife and midline soft tissue dissection with cautery need to be done with caution to avoid puncturing the dura.

6. Lateral tissue expanding retractors can be used by novice surgeons to get a good overview in the beginning cases.

7. Toggling the expandable retractors craniocaudally helps in gaining more length of tissue exposure with a small skin incision.

8. All dural injuries must be taken seriously and prompt closure using muscle/fat graft must be done.

9. Continuous running fascial suturing is of utmost importance, especially in cases where there is a dural injury.

10. Subcuticular suturing provides the best cosmetic results than interrupted sutures.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Spine—Other

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 65196 KB)

Supplementary file2 (MP4 82576 KB)

Supplementary file3 (MP4 58045 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tyagi, G., Uppar, A.M., Pruthi, N. et al. Minimally invasive foramen magnum decompression using tubular retractors (MIFT) for Chiari I malformations. Acta Neurochir 165, 767–770 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05490-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-023-05490-0

Keywords

Navigation