Skip to main content
Log in

Transmastoid presigmoid retrolabyrinthine approach for removal of pontine cavernous malformation: how I do it

  • How I Do it - Neurosurgical technique evaluation
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Bleeding of brainstem cavernous malformations (BSCM) cause high morbidity and should be treated surgically whenever possible.

Method

We present a 56-year-old man, who was diagnosed with a BSCM at right pons, which caused functional impairments of dorsal column, spinothalamic tract, cochlear nucleus, and middle cerebellar peduncle. A transmastoid presigmoid retorlabyrinthine approach via the lateral pontine zone (LPZ), with an assistance of imaging guidance and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring, was performed to completely resect the BSCM. The patient recovered despite a transient worsening of cerebellar sign and hemiparesthesia for 1 week, without surgical complications.

Conclusions

A transmastoid presigmoid retrolabyrinthine approach through LPZ is safe and effective for lateral pontine BSCM resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BSCM:

Brainstem cavernous malformation

CPA:

Cerebellopontine angle

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

CN:

Cranial nerve

CT:

Computed tomography

IONM:

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

LPZ:

Lateral pontine zone

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

SCC:

Semicircular canal

References

  1. Agrawal SK, Parnes LS (2008) Transmastoid superior semicircular canal occlusion. Otol Neurotol 29:363–367. https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0b013e3181616c9d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bento RF, De Brito RV, Sanchez TG, Miniti A (2002) The transmastoid retrolabyrinthine approach in vestibular schwannoma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:437–441. https://doi.org/10.1067/mhn.2002.129824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cavalcanti DD, Preul MC, Kalani MY, Spetzler RF (2016) Microsurgical anatomy of safe entry zones to the brainstem. J Neurosurg 124:1359–1376. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.4.JNS141945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Garcia RM, Ivan ME, Lawton MT (2015) Brainstem cavernous malformations: surgical results in 104 patients and a proposed grading system to predict neurological outcomes. Neurosurgery 76:265–277; discussion 277-268. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0000000000000602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Giliberto G, Lanzino DJ, Diehn FE, Factor D, Flemming KD, Lanzino G (2010) Brainstem cavernous malformations: anatomical, clinical, and surgical considerations. Neurosurg Focus 29:E9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.6.FOCUS10133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalani MY, Yagmurlu K, Martirosyan NL, Cavalcanti DD, Spetzler RF (2016) Approach selection for intrinsic brainstem pathologies. J Neurosurg 125:1596–1607. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.6.JNS161043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kearns KN, Chen CJ, Tvrdik P, Park MS, Kalani MYS (2019) Outcomes of surgery for brainstem cavernous malformations: a systematic review. Stroke 50:2964–2966. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rhoton AL (2003) Rhoton cranial anatomy and surgical approaches. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wong AK, Stamates MM, Bhansali AP, Shinners M, Wong RH (2017) Radiographic assessment of the presigmoid retrolabyrinthine approach. Surg Neurol Int 8:129. https://doi.org/10.4103/sni.sni_243_16

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Xie MG, Li D, Guo FZ, Zhang LW, Zhang JT, Wu Z, Meng GL, Xiao XR (2018) Brainstem cavernous malformations: surgical indications based on natural history and surgical outcomes. World Neurosurg 110:55–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ko-Ting Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Patient consent

The patient has consented to the submission of this How I Do It for submission to the journal.

Additional information

Summary of 10 Key Points

1. Transmastoid presigmoid retrolabyrinthine approach is the shortest route and provide direct approach to lateral pontine zone of brainstem.

2. Lateral pontine zone is a safe entry zone to resect lateral pontine lesions.

3. Transmastoid approach without a need of craniotomy is efficient and effective in selected cases.

4. Neuronavigation system incorporating with high resolution CT (temporal bone) and brain MRI provides valuable anatomical information in petrosal approach for BSCMs.

5. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring provides valuable physiological information before, during, and after BSCM removal.

6. Temporalis fascia graft is useful to close presigmoid dura defect.

7. Tissue glue provides extra-support to prevent CSF leakage.

8. Bone wax should be used to cover the drilled rough surface of petrous bone.

9. A generous fat graft should be harvested to plug into the drilled aeration dead space, which provides support to dura graft and decreases risk of CSF leakage and CNS infection.

10. A cosmetic mastoid cortical bone reconstruction is suggested.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neurosurgical technique evaluation

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

Photos taken by neuronavigation system after dura was opened. (A) Bone window of brain CT confirmed the location of semicircular canal and a retrolabyrinthe approach. (B) Brain MRI confirmed the LPZ, which provides the shortest distance to the cavernoma. (PNG 984 kb)

High resolution image (TIF 3415 kb)

ESM 2

Subcortical motor evoked potential for detecting fiber tracts of CN6,7 (upper 2 rows), upper limbs (middle 2 rows) and lower limbs (lower 2 rows). No active response could be generated by 3 mA stimulation; while all except anterior tibialis muscle response could be generated by 5 mA stimulation. (PNG 495 kb)

High resolution image (TIF 4324 kb)

ESM 3

Left upper limb somatosensory evoked potential did not change through the whole surgery (upper graph). Bilateral auditory brainstem response (ABR) shows a decline of ABR at right side before entering into pons, suggesting a decrease of cochlear function resulted from bleeding cavernoma, and the waveform did not change bilaterally through the whole surgery (lower graph). (PNG 558 kb)

High resolution image (TIF 3923 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yeh, YC., Wei, KC. & Chen, KT. Transmastoid presigmoid retrolabyrinthine approach for removal of pontine cavernous malformation: how I do it. Acta Neurochir 162, 1131–1135 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04263-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04263-3

Keywords

Navigation