Surface reconstruction from routine CT-scan shows large anatomical variations of falx cerebri and tentorium cerebelli

Abstract

Background

Finite element modeling of the human head offers an alternative to experimental methods in understanding the biomechanical response of the head in trauma brain injuries. Falx, tentorium, and their notches are important structures surrounding the brain, and data about their anatomical variations are sparse.

Objective

To describe and quantify anatomical variations of falx cerebri, tentorium cerebelli, and their notches.

Methods

3D reconstruction of falx and tentorium was performed by points identification on 40 brain CT-scans in a tailored Matlab program. A scatter plot was obtained for each subject, and 8 anatomical landmarks were selected. A reference frame was defined to determine the coordinates of landmarks. Segments and areas were computed. A reproducibility study was done.

Results

The height of falx was 34.9 ± 3.9 mm and its surface area 56.5 ± 7.7 cm2. The width of tentorium was 99.64 ± 4.79 mm and its surface area 57.6 ± 5.8 cm2. The mean length, height, and surface area of falx notch were respectively 96.9 ± 8 mm, 41.8 ± 5.9 mm, and 28.8 ± 5.8 cm2 (range 15.8–40.5 cm2). The anterior and maximal widths of tentorial notch were 25.5 ± 3.5 mm and 30.9 ± 2.5 mm; its length 54.9 ± 5.2 mm and its surface area 13.26 ± 1.6 cm2. The length of falx notch correlated with the length of tentorial notch (r = 0.62, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

We observe large anatomical variations of falx, tentorium, and notches, crucial to better understand the biomechanics of brain injury, in personalized finite element models.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. 1.

    Adeeb N, Mortazavi MM, Tubbs RS, Cohen-Gadol AA (2012) The cranial dura mater: a review of its history, embryology, and anatomy. Childs Nerv Syst 28(6):827–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Adler DE, Milhorat TH (2002) The tentorial notch: anatomical variation, morphometric analysis, and classification in 100 human autopsy cases. J Neurosurg 96(6):1103–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bradshaw DR, Ivarsson J, Morfey CL, Viano DC (2001) Simulation of acute subdural hematoma and diffuse axonal injury in coronal head impact. J Biomech 34(1):85–94

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Brockmann C, Kunze SC, Schmiedek P, Groden C, Scharf J (2012) Variations of the superior sagittal sinus and bridging veins in human dissections and computed tomography venography. Clin Imaging 36(2):85–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Corsellis JA (1958) Individual variation in the size of the tentorial opening. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 21(4):279–283

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Dagtekin A, Avci E, Uzmansel D, Kurtoglu Z, Kara E, Uluc K, Akture E, Baskaya MK (2014) Microsurgical anatomy and variations of the anterior clinoid process. Turk Neurosurg 24(4):484–493

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Fisher CM (1995) Brain herniation: a revision of classical concepts. Can J Neurol Sci J Can Sci Neurol 22(02):83–91

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Galligioni F, Bernardi R, Mingrino S (1969) Anatomic variation of the height of the falx cerebri. Its relationship to displacement of the anterior cerebral artery in frontal space-occupying lesions. Am J Roentgenol Radium Therapy, Nucl Med 106(2):273–278

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hardy WN, Mason MJ, Foster CD et al (2007) A study of the response of the human cadaver head to impact. Stapp Car Crash J 51:17–80

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Hernandez F, Giordano C, Goubran M, Parivash S, Grant G, Zeineh M, Camarillo D (2019) Lateral impacts correlate with falx cerebri displacement and corpus callosum trauma in sports-related concussions. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 18(3):631–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ho J, Zhou Z, Li X, Kleiven S (2017) The peculiar properties of the falx and tentorium in brain injury biomechanics. J Biomech 60:243–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Isherwood I (1995) Edward wing twining, 1887-1939. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 16(10):2077–2080

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kleiven S, Hardy WN (2002) Correlation of an FE model of the human head with local brain motion--consequences for injury prediction. Stapp Car Crash J 46:123–144

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Klintworth GK (1967) The ontogeny and growth of the human tentorium cerebelli. Anat Rec 158(4):433–441

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Klintworth GK (1968) The comparative anatomy and phylogeny of the tentorium cerebelli. Anat Rec 160(3):635–642

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Lafazanos S, Türe U, Harput MV, Gonzalez Lopez P, Fırat Z, Türe H, Dimitriou T, Yaşargil MG (2015) Evaluating the importance of the tentorial angle in the paramedian supracerebellar-transtentorial approach for selective amygdalohippocampectomy. World Neurosurg 83(5):836–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Meyer A (1920) Herniation of the brain. Arch Neurol Psychiatr 4

  18. 18.

    O’Rahilly R, Müller F (1986) The meninges in human development. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 45(5):588–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ono M, Ono M, Rhoton AL Jr, Barry M (1984) Microsurgical anatomy of the region of the tentorial incisura. J Neurosurg 60(2):365–399

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Raul J-S, Deck C, Willinger R, Ludes B (2008) Finite-element models of the human head and their applications in forensic practice. Int J Legal Med 122(5):359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Rhoton AL (2000) Tentorial incisura. Neurosurgery 47(3 Suppl):S131–S153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sunderland S (1958) The tentorial notch and complications produced by herniations of the brain through that aperture. Br J Surg 45(193):422–438

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Syed HR, Jean WC (2018) A novel method to measure the tentorial angle and the implications on surgeries of the pineal region. World Neurosurg 111:e213–e220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Tse KM, Lim SP, Tan VBC, Lee HP (2014) A review of head injury and finite element head models. Am J Eng Technol Soc 1(5):28–52

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Van Noort R, Black MM, Martin TR, Meanley S (1981) A study of the uniaxial mechanical properties of human dura mater preserved in glycerol. Biomaterials 2(1):41–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stéphane Goutagny.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (APHP/CNIL) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neurosurgical Anatomy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Staquet, H., Francois, PM., Sandoz, B. et al. Surface reconstruction from routine CT-scan shows large anatomical variations of falx cerebri and tentorium cerebelli. Acta Neurochir 163, 607–613 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-020-04256-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Modeling
  • Brain herniation
  • Brainstem
  • Corpus callosum injury
  • Reference frame