Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Women in German Neurosurgery: Status and Representation at Annual National Meetings

  • Original Article - Neurosurgery general
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Few women have ascended the professional-academic ladder to become chairs of German neurosurgical departments. Indeed, only 2 out of 36 current departmental heads are female. This study aims to assess the current representation and role of women in German neurosurgery and to identify indicators of how these aspects will progress.

Methods

National statistics concerning the gender distribution of neurosurgery specialists over the past 20 y and the gender distribution across DGNC (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie - German Society of Neurosurgery) membership grades from 2016 to 2018 were obtained from the Federal Statistical Office and the DGNC, respectively. Additionally, the programmes of DGNC annual meetings from 2015 to 2018 were evaluated to determine the number of presentations and speaking time awarded to male and female presenters.

Results

In 2017, 19% of neurosurgical specialists were female. In the same year, overall 13% of the members of the DGNC were female. There were a higher proportion of females among extraordinary members. In the last 4 y, females were overall responsible for less than a third of presentations at the annual DGNC meetings. There was also a decrease of female participation from 2015 to 2018, with regard to both overall amount of presentations and speaking time. Female participation was overall higher for presentation types typically associated with lower academic and clinical positions and which cover shorter speaking times.

Conclusions

In Germany, which has one of Europe’s largest neurosurgical communities, female neurosurgeons remain a minority. Structured programmes to support gender equality and diversity could facilitate the rise of women to senior positions and close the gender gap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abadi M (2018) There are only 25 women CEOs in the Fortune 500 — here’s the full list https://www.businessinsider.de/fortune-500-companies-women-ceos-2018-8?r=US&IR=T. Accessed 22 Apr 2019

  2. Bissing MA, Lange EMS, Davila WF, Wong CA, McCarthy RJ, Stock MC, Toledo P (2019) Status of women in academic anesthesiology: a 10-year update. Anesth Analg 128(1):137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. der Deutsche Ärztinnenbund https://www.aerztinnenbund.de. Accessed 22 Apr 2019

  4. der Deutsche Ärztinnenbund mit Unterstützung des Bundesfamilienministeriums (2016) Medical Women on Top https://www.aerztinnenbund.de/downloads/4/WoT.pdf. Accessed 22 Apr 2019

  5. Epstein NE (2017) Discrimination against female surgeons is still alive: where are the full professorships and chairs of departments? Surg Neurol Int 8:93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Geis-Thöne W (2018) Betreuungslücke sinkt leicht auf 273.000 Plätze. Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft. https://www.iwkoeln.de/institut.html. Accessed 22 Jul 2019

  7. Grant Thornton (2018) Women in Business: Beyond Policy to Progress. https://www.grantthornton.global/en/insights/articles/women-in-business-2018-report-page/. Accessed 22 Apr 2019

  8. Helmer M, Schottdorf M, Neef A, Battaglia D (2017) Gender bias in scholarly peer review. Elife 6:e21718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. HESA (2018) Higher education student statistics: UK, 2016/17 - subjects studied. https://www.hesa.ac.uk/news/11-01-2018/sfr247-higher-education-student-statistics/subjects. Accessed 22 Apr 2019

  10. Hibbeler B, Korzilius H (2008) Arztberuf: Die Medizin wird weiblich. Dtsch Arztebl 105(12):A-609 / B-539 / C-527

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jenner S, Djermester P, Prügl J, Kurmeyer C, Oertelt-Prigione S (2019) Prevalence of sexual harassment in academic medicine. JAMA Int Med 179(1):108–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaczmarczyk G (2006) Frauen in Führungspositionen: Karriere als Ärztin?! Dtsch Arztebl 103(31–32):A-2132 / B-1840 / C-1780

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kolev J, Fuentes-Medel Y, Murray F (2019) Natl bureau econ. Res. Working paper no. 25759. https://www.nber.org/papers/w25759. Accessed 22 Jul 2019

  14. Levine SS, Apfelbaum EP, Bernard M, Bartelt VL, Zajac EJ, Stark D (2014) Ethnic diversity deflates price bubbles. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111(52):18524–18529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McKinsey (2018) Delivering through Diversity. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/BusinessFunctions/Organization/OurInsights/Deliveringthroughdiversity/Delivering-through-diversity_full-report.ashx. Accessed 22 Jul 2019

  16. Nathan M, Lee N (2013) Cultural diversity, innovation, and entrepreneurship: firm-level evidence from London. Econ Geogr 89(4):367–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Penny M, Jeffries R, Grant J, Davies SC (2014) Women and academic medicine: a review of the evidence on female representation. J R Soc Med 107(7):259–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Phillips K W, Kim-Jun S Y, Shim S H (2011) The value of diversity in organizations: a social psychological perspective. Social psychology and organizations, 253–271

  19. Rapaport L (2015) Women Lag Men in Medical School Professor Jobs https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/women-lag-men-in-medical-research-funds-and-faculty-posts/. Accessed 22 Apr 2019

  20. Richter-Kuhlmann E (2017) Ärztinnen: Die Medizin ist weiblich, aber noch nicht an der Spitze. Dtsch Arztebl 114(42):A-1908 / B-1618 / C-1584

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sarkadi A, Kristiansson R, Oberklaid F, Bremberg S (2008) Fathers’ involvement and children’s developmental outcomes: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Acta Paediatr 97(2):153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sommers SR (2006) On racial diversity and group decision making: identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations. J Pers Soc Psychol 90(4):597–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Spetzler RF (2011) Progress of women in neurosurgery. Asian J Neurosurg 6(1):6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Study International Staff (2018) Women now outnumber men in US medical schools https://www.studyinternational.com/news/women-now-outnumber-men-us-medical-schools/. Accessed 22 Apr 2019

  25. Witte F (2018) Dünne Luft https://www.sueddeutsche.de/wissen/frauen-in-der-medizin-duenne-luft-1.4024357. Accessed 22 Apr 2019

  26. Wolfert C, Rohde V, Mielke D, Hernández-Durán S (2019) Female neurosurgeons in Europe—on a prevailing glass ceiling. World Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Woodrow SI, Gilmer-Hill H, Rutka JT (2006) The neurosurgical workforce in North America: a critical review of gender issues. Neurosurgery 59(4):749–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Lawson McLean.

Ethics declarations

Ethics statement

The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or patient data.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Neurosurgery general

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lawson McLean, A. Women in German Neurosurgery: Status and Representation at Annual National Meetings. Acta Neurochir 162, 231–236 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04164-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04164-0

Keywords

Navigation