Ki-67 labeling index and expression of p53 are non-predictive for invasiveness and tumor size in functional and nonfunctional pituitary adenomas
It is still controversial whether an increased proliferation index is correlated with the tumor invasiveness of pituitary adenomas. A homogeneous large monocentric series of pituitary adenomas was retrospectively analyzed. The correlation between the proliferation indices (Ki-67 and p53 expression levels) and invasiveness and size of pituitary adenomas was investigated in primary operated and recurrent adenomas.
Four hundred thirty-nine patients after resection of pituitary adenomas were retrospectively included (43 recurrent tumors, 196 null cell adenomas, 86 somatotroph adenomas, 55 corticotroph adenomas, 55 prolactinomas, 4 thyreotroph adenomas). The maximum tumor diameter and tumor invasiveness in Knosp grading were assessed and Ki-67 and p53 immunostaining was performed. The role of invasiveness was evaluated using a cumulative odds ordinal logistic regression. For calculating the effect of tumor size, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted.
Overall and in the subgroups, no significant correlation between proliferation indices and mean tumor diameter was found. No significant predictive expression value of Ki-67 and p53 on tumor invasiveness and in recurrent tumors could be demonstrated. There was a tendency that Ki-67 LI and p53 LI are higher in recurrent corticotroph adenomas and lactotroph adenomas but values did not reach the significant level.
Invasive character of pituitary adenomas is neither correlated with increased Ki-67 LI nor with increased p53 expression. Proliferation parameters are independent from adenoma size at initial presentation. The partly elevated expression of Ki-67 in recurrent tumors underlines the clinical importance of the marker.
KeywordsPituitary adenomas p53 Ki-67 Invasiveness
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (University Hospital Tübingen, Germany) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- 3.Chiloiro S, Bianchi A, Doglietto F, de Waure C, Giampietro A, Fusco A, Iacovazzo D, Tartaglione L, Di Nardo F, Signorelli F, Lauriola L, Anile C, Rindi G, Maira G, Pontecorvi A, De Marinis L (2014) Radically resected pituitary adenomas: prognostic role of Ki 67 labeling index in a monocentric retrospective series and literature review. Pituitary 17:267–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-013-0500-6 Google Scholar
- 4.Chiloiro S, Doglietto F, Trapasso B, Iacovazzo D, Giampietro A, Di Nardo F, de Waure C, Lauriola L, Mangiola A, Anile C, Maira G, De Marinis L, Bianchi A (2015) Typical and atypical pituitary adenomas: a single-center analysis of outcome and prognosis. Neuroendocrinology 101:143–150. https://doi.org/10.1159/000375448 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.De Lellis RALR, Heitz PU et al (2004) World Health Organization classification of tumours: pathology and genetics of tumours of endocrine organs. IARC Press, Lyon, pp 9–47Google Scholar
- 11.Jahangiri A, Wagner JR, Pekmezci M, Hiniker A, Chang EF, Kunwar S, Blevins L, Aghi MK (2013) A comprehensive long-term retrospective analysis of silent corticotrophic adenomas vs hormone-negative adenomas. Neurosurgery 73:8–17discussion 17-18. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000429858.96652.1e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Knosp E, Steiner E, Kitz K, Matula C (1993) Pituitary adenomas with invasion of the cavernous sinus space: a magnetic resonance imaging classification compared with surgical findings. Neurosurgery 33:610–617 discussion 617-618Google Scholar
- 15.Lloyd RVOR, Kloppel G, Rosai J (2017) WHO classification of tumours of endocrine organs, 4th edn. IARC Press, Lyon, p 13Google Scholar
- 16.Madsen H, Borges TM, Knox AJ, Michaelis KA, Xu M, Lillehei KO, Wierman ME, Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK (2011) Giant pituitary adenomas: pathologic-radiographic correlations and lack of role for p53 and MIB-1 labeling. Am J Surg Pathol 35:1204–1213. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e31821e8c96 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Mete O, Gomez-Hernandez K, Kucharczyk W, Ridout R, Zadeh G, Gentili F, Ezzat S, Asa SL (2016) Silent subtype 3 pituitary adenomas are not always silent and represent poorly differentiated monomorphous plurihormonal Pit-1 lineage adenomas. Mod Pathol 29:131–142. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2015.151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Miermeister CP, Petersenn S, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R, Ludecke DK, Holsken A, Bergmann M, Knappe HU, Hans VH, Flitsch J, Saeger W, Buslei R (2015) Histological criteria for atypical pituitary adenomas - data from the German pituitary adenoma registry suggests modifications. Acta Neuropathol Commun 3:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-015-0229-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Ramirez C, Cheng S, Vargas G, Asa SL, Ezzat S, Gonzalez B, Cabrera L, Guinto G, Mercado M (2012) Expression of Ki-67, PTTG1, FGFR4, and SSTR 2, 3, and 5 in nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a high throughput TMA, immunohistochemical study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:1745–1751. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-3163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Salehi F, Agur A, Scheithauer BW, Kovacs K, Lloyd RV, Cusimano M (2009) Ki-67 in pituitary neoplasms: a review--part I. Neurosurgery 65:429–437discussion 437. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000349930.66434.82 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Trouillas J, Roy P, Sturm N, Dantony E, Cortet-Rudelli C, Viennet G, Bonneville JF, Assaker R, Auger C, Brue T, Cornelius A, Dufour H, Jouanneau E, Francois P, Galland F, Mougel F, Chapuis F, Villeneuve L, Maurage CA, Figarella-Branger D, Raverot G, members of H, Barlier A, Bernier M, Bonnet F, Borson-Chazot F, Brassier G, Caulet-Maugendre S, Chabre O, Chanson P, Cottier JF, Delemer B, Delgrange E, Di Tommaso L, Eimer S, Gaillard S, Jan M, Girard JJ, Lapras V, Loiseau H, Passagia JG, Patey M, Penfornis A, Poirier JY, Perrin G, Tabarin A (2013) A new prognostic clinicopathological classification of pituitary adenomas: a multicentric case-control study of 410 patients with 8 years post-operative follow-up. Acta Neuropathol 126:123–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-013-1084-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Warnet A, Porsova-Dutoit I, Lahlou N, Seret-Begue D, Lajeunie E, Chanson P, Woimant F, Lot G, Guillausseau PJ, Roger M (1994) Glycoprotein hormone alpha-subunit secretion in prolactinomas and in non-functioning adenomas: relation with the tumour size. Clin Endocrinol 41:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar