Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Longitudinal brain activation changes related to electrophysiological findings in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy before and after spinal cord decompression: an fMRI study

  • Original Article - Spine
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction, potentially leading to severe disability. Abnormal cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) are independent predictors of disease progression. Abnormal MRI is accompanied by various activation changes in functional brain MRI (fMRI), whereas preoperative and postoperative fMRI adaptations associated with abnormal preoperative MEP remain unknown.

Methods

Twenty patients (9 males, average age 56.6) with evidence of spinal cord compression on MRI and clinical signs of mild CSM were included. Participants were classified according to their preoperative MEP and underwent three brain fMRI examinations: before surgery, 6, and 12 months after surgery while performing repeated extension-flexion of each wrist.

Results

Functional MRI activation was compared between two subsets of patients, with normal and clearly abnormal MEP (right wrist: 8 vs. 8; left wrist: 7 vs. 9). At baseline, abnormal MEPs were associated with hyperactivation in the cerebellum. At the first follow-up, further hyperactivations emerged in the contralateral sensorimotor cortices and persisted for 1 year. In normal baseline MEP, activation mostly decreased in the ipsilateral sensorimotor cortex postoperatively. The ipsilateral sensorimotor activation after 1-year follow-up correlated with baseline MEP.

Conclusions

Abnormal corticospinal MEP findings in cervical spondylotic myelopathy were associated with differences in brain activation, which further increased after spinal cord decompression and did not resolve within 12-month follow-up. In summary, surgery may come too late for those patients with abnormal MEP to recover completely despite their mild clinical signs and symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AP:

anteroposterior

ANOVA:

analysis of variance

CMCT:

central motor conduction time

CSM:

cervical spondylotic myelopathy

DWI:

diffusion-weighted imaging

EPI:

echo planar imaging

fMRI:

functional MR imaging

FWHM:

full width at half maximum

GLM:

general linear model

Group A:

abnormal MEP

Group B:

borderline MEP

Group N:

normal MEP

LE:

lower extremity

LW:

left wrist

M0:

month 0

M6:

month 6

M12:

month 12

MEP:

motor evoked potentials

mJOA:

modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score

MNI:

Montreal Neurological Institute

MPRAGE:

magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo

MRI:

magnetic resonance imaging

NDI:

Neck Disability Index

PEEK:

polyetheretherketon

ROI:

region of interest

RW:

right wrist

SD:

standard deviation

SEP:

somatosensory evoked potentials

SMA:

supplementary motor area

UE:

upper extremity

VAS:

visual analogue scale

References

  1. Aleksanderek I, Stevens TK, Goncalves S, Bartha R, Duggal N (2017) Metabolite and functional profile of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine:1–7

  2. Allison JD, Meador KJ, Loring DW, Figueroa RE, Wright JC (2000) Functional MRI cerebral activation and deactivation during finger movement. Neurology 54(1):135–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bednařík J, Kadaňka Z, Dušek L, Keřkovský M, Voháňka S, Novotný O, Urbánek I, Kratochvílová D (2008) Presymptomatic spondylotic cervical myelopathy: an updated predictive model. Eur Spine J 17(3):421–431

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bednařík J, Kadaňka Z, Dušek L, Novotný O, Šurelová D, Urbánek I, Prokeš B (2004) Presymptomatic spondylotic cervical cord compression. Spine 29(20):2260–2269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bednařík J, Kadaňka Z, Voháňka S, Stejskal L, Vlach O, Schröder R (1999) The value of somatosensory- and motor-evoked potentials in predicting and monitoring the effect of therapy in spondylotic cervical myelopathy. Prospective randomized study. Spine 24(15):1593–1598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dong Y, Holly LT, Albistegui-Dubois R, Yan X, Marehbian J, Newton JM, Dobkin BH (2008) Compensatory cerebral adaptations before and evolving changes after surgical decompression in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 9(6):538–551

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Duggal N, Rabin D, Bartha R, Barry RL, Gati JS, Kowalczyk I, Fink M (2010) Brain reorganization in patients with spinal cord compression evaluated using fMRI. Neurology 74(13):1048–1054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grabner G, Janke AL, Budge MM, Smith D, Pruessner J, Collins DL (2006) Symmetric atlasing and model based segmentation: an application to the hippocampus in older adults. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 9(Pt 2):58–66

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Holly LT, Dong Y, Albistegui-DuBois R, Marehbian J, Dobkin B (2007) Cortical reorganization in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 6(6):544–551

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hrabálek L, Hluštík P, Hok P, Čecháková E, Wanek T, Otruba P, Vaverka M, Kaňovský P (2015) Influence of cervical spondylotic spinal cord compression on cerebral cortical adaptation. Radiological study. Acta Chir orthop Traum čech 82(6):404–411

  11. Hrabálek L, Hluštík P, Hok P, Wanek T, Otruba P, Čecháková E, Vaverka M, Kaňovský P (2014) Effects of spinal cord decompression in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy oncortical brain activations. Rozhledy v chirurgii : mesicnik Ceskoslovenske chirurgicke spolecnosti 93(11):530–535

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jenkinson M, Beckmann CF, Behrens TEJ, Woolrich MW, Smith SM (2012) FSL. NeuroImage 62(2):782–790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jurkiewicz MT, Mikulis DJ, McIlroy WE, Fehlings MG, Verrier MC (2007) Sensorimotor cortical plasticity during recovery following spinal cord injury: a longitudinal fMRI study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 21(6):527–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kadaňka Z, Keřkovský M, Bednařík J, Jarkovský J (2007) Cross-sectional transverse area and hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging in relation to the clinical picture in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine 32(23):2573–2577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalsi-Ryan S, Karadimas SK, Fehlings MG (2013) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: the clinical phenomenon and the current pathobiology of an increasingly prevalent and devastating disorder. Neuroscientist 19(4):409–421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Keřkovský M, Bednařík J, Dušek L, Šprláková-Puková A, Urbánek I, Mechl M, Válek V, Kadaňka Z (2012) Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in patients with cervical spondylotic spinal cord compression: correlations between clinical and electrophysiological findings. Spine 37(1):48–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kowalczyk I, Duggal N, Bartha R (2012) Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the motor cortex in cervical myelopathy. Brain 135(Pt 2):461–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Manto M, Bower J, Conforto A et al (2012) Consensus paper: roles of the cerebellum in motor control—the diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement. Cerebellum 11(2):457–487

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Penhune VB, Steele CJ (2012) Parallel contributions of cerebellar, striatal and M1 mechanisms to motor sequence learning. Behav Brain Res 226(2):579–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tam S, Barry RL, Bartha R, Duggal N (2010) Changes in functional magnetic resonance imaging cortical activation after decompression of cervical spondylosis: case report. Neurosurgery 67(3):E863–E864

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the grant IGA MZ ČR NT 14609.

Funding

This study was supported by the grant IGA MZ ČR NT 14609.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavel Hok.

Ethics declarations

Prior to study initiation, the study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee. Informed consent was obtained from each study participant prior to any study procedure.

Conflicts of interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge, or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Animal experiments

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hrabálek, L., Hok, P., Hluštík, P. et al. Longitudinal brain activation changes related to electrophysiological findings in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy before and after spinal cord decompression: an fMRI study. Acta Neurochir 160, 923–932 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3520-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-018-3520-1

Keywords

Navigation