Advertisement

Acta Neurochirurgica

, Volume 160, Issue 5, pp 885–891 | Cite as

A randomised controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty: long-term follow-up

  • Stephen Honeybul
  • David Anthony Morrison
  • Kwok M. Ho
  • Christopher R. P. Lind
  • Elizabeth Geelhoed
Original Article - Neurosurgical technique evaluation

Abstract

Objective

To compare the long-term outcomes of patients who had been randomly allocated to receive primary titanium cranioplasty or autologous bone graft following decompressive craniectomy.

Methods

Sixty-four patients had been previously enrolled and randomised to receive either their own bone graft or a primary titanium cranioplasty. Functional and cosmetic outcomes had previously been assessed at 1-year following the cranioplasty procedure. Hospital records and the Picture Archiving communication system were reviewed to determine how many patients had cranioplasty failure or associated complications such as seizures beyond 1 year—with a minimum of 24-month follow-up.

Results

Amongst the 31 patients in the titanium group (one patient had died), no patients had a partial or complete cranioplasty failure at 12 months follow-up and there had been no failures beyond 12 months. Amongst the 31 patients who had an autologous cranioplasty (one patient had died), 7 patients had complete resorption of the autologous bone such that it was adjudged a complete failure at 12-month follow-up. Five of these patients had had titanium augmentation and two patients declined further surgery. Both of these patients requested cranial augmentation for functional and cosmetic reasons subsequent to the 12-month follow-up. Another patient who had previously been noted to have moderate resorption at 12 months presented 1 year later with progressive bone flap resorption and also required subsequent augmentation for functional and cosmetic reasons. When follow-up was extended to a minimum of 24 months, use of titanium instead of autologous bone for primary cranioplasty resulted in a significant reduction in the number of patients who required rescue cranioplasty (0 vs 25%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.1–42.1%; p = 0.001). In addition, there were significantly less total hospital healthcare costs in those patients randomised to the titanium arm of the trial (difference = A$9999, 95%CI 2231–17,768; p = 0.015).

Conclusions

Bone resorption continued to occur beyond 12 months after autologous cranioplasty; use of primary titanium cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy reduced the number of reoperations needed and the associated long-term total hospital costs.

Keywords

Decompressive craniectomy Autologous cranioplasty Titanium cranioplasty Randomised controlled trial 

Notes

Author contributions

Stephen Honeybul—literature search, study design, data collection, manuscript preparation.

David Anthony Morrison—titanium plate manufacture, study design, manuscript preparation.

Kwok M. Ho—study design, data analysis, statistical analysis, manuscript preparation.

Christopher RP Lind—study design, data analysis, manuscript preparation.

Elizabeth Geelhoed—study design, data analysis, cost analysis, manuscript preparation.

Funding

Partially funded by Western Australian State Health Research Advisory Council ($129,500). This funding was used to cover the costs of the titanium plates manufactured at Royal Perth Hospital. The sponsor had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the two hospitals that provide neurosurgical services in Western Australia (Royal Perth Hospital; EC 2012/126 and Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital; EC 2012-052) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Day RE, Guy DT, Kop AM, Morrison DA (2012) The Royal Perth Hospital method for the design and manufacture of titanium cranioplasty plates. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:376–387CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dünisch P, Walter J, Sakr Y, Kalff R, Waschke A, Ewald C (2013) Risk factors of aseptic bone resorption: a study after autologous bone flap reinsertion due to decompressive craniotomy. J Neurosurg 118:1141–1147CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gooch MR, Gin GE, Kenning TJ, German JW (2009) Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy: analysis of 62 cases. Neurosurg Focus 26:E9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grant GA, Jolley M, Ellenbogen RG, Roberts TS, Gruss JR, Loeser JD (2004) Failure of autologous bone-assisted cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy in children and adolescents. J Neurosurg 100(2 Suppl Pediatrics):163–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ho KM, Honeybul S, Lind CR, Gillett GR, Litton E (2011) Cost-effectiveness of decompressive craniectomy as a lifesaving rescue procedure for patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 71:1637–1644PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Honeybul S, Ho KM (2013) The current role of decompressive craniectomy in the management of neurological emergencies. Brain Inj 27:979–991CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Honeybul S, Ho KM (2011) Long-term complications of decompressive craniectomy for head injury. J Neurotrauma 28:929–935CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Honeybul S, Ho KM (2012) How “successful” is calvarial reconstruction using frozen autologous bone? Plast Reconstr Surg 130:1110–1117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Honeybul S, Morrison DA, Ho KM, Lind CR, Geelhoed E (2017) A randomized controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty. J Neurosurg 126:81–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG, Timofeev IS, Corteen EA, Czosnyka M, Timothy J, Anderson I, Bulters DO, Belli A, Eynon CA, Wadley J, Mendelow AD, Mitchell PM, Wilson MH, Critchley G, Sahuquillo J, Unterberg A, Servadei F, Teasdale GM, Pickard JD, Menon DK, Murray GD, Kirkpatrick PJ, RESCUEicp Trial Collaborators (2016) Trial of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic intracranial hypertension. N Engl J Med 375:1119–1130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matsuno A, Tanaka H, Iwamuro H, Takanashi S, Miyawaki S, Nakashima M, Nakaguchi H, Nagashima T (2006) Analyses of the factors influencing bone graft infection after delayed cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir 148:535–540CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Park EK, Lim JY, Yun IS, Kim JS, Woo SH, Kim DS, Shim KW (2016) Cranioplasty enhanced by three-dimensional printing: custom-made three-dimensional-printed titanium implants for skull defects. J Craniofac Surg 27:943–949CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schuss P, Vatter H, Oszvald A, Marquardt G, Imöhl L, Seifert V, Güresir E (2013) Bone flap resorption: risk factors for the development of a long-term complication following cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy. J Neurotrauma 30:91–95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stieglitz LH, Fung C, Murek M, Fichtner J, Raabe A, Beck J (2015) What happens to the bone flap? Long-term outcome after reimplantation of cryoconserved bone flaps in a consecutive series of 92 patients. Acta Neurochir 157:275–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vahedi K, Hofmeijer J, Juettler E, Vicaut E, George B, Algra A, Amelink GJ, Schmiedeck P, Schwab S, Rothwell PM, Bousser MG, van der Worp HB, Hacke W, DECIMAL, DESTINY, and HAMLET investigators (2007) Early decompressive surgery in malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery: a pooled analysis of three randomised controlled trials. Lancet Neurol 6:215–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wiggins A, Austerberry R, Morrison D, Ho KM, Honeybul S (2013) Cranioplasty with custom-made titanium plates-14 years experience. Neurosurgery 72:248–256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang XF, Wen L, Shen F, Li G, Lou R, Liu WG, Zhan RY (2008) Surgical complications secondary to decompressive craniectomy in patients with a head injury: a series of 108 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir 150:1241–1247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Honeybul
    • 1
    • 2
  • David Anthony Morrison
    • 3
  • Kwok M. Ho
    • 4
    • 5
  • Christopher R. P. Lind
    • 1
    • 6
  • Elizabeth Geelhoed
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of Neurosurgery, Sir Charles Gairdner HospitalPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Royal Perth HospitalPerthAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Medical Engineering and Physics, Royal Perth HospitalPerthAustralia
  4. 4.Department of Intensive Care, Royal Perth Hospital and School of Population HealthUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  5. 5.School of Veterinary and Life SciencesMurdoch UniversityPerthAustralia
  6. 6.School of SurgeryUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  7. 7.School of Population HealthUniversity of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations