Intramedullary ependymoma: long-term outcome after surgery
- 82 Downloads
Overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients undergoing spinal ependymoma resection has been frequently reported. Contrarily, OS and PFS of purely intramedullary ependymomas have not been clearly determined yet.
The data of 37 patients undergoing resection of an intramedullary ependymoma (IE) from January 2000 to December 2016 were analysed retrospectively.
The mean age was 46 years. The male:female ratio was 24:13. The median duration of symptoms was 12 months. Sixty-two per cent of ependymomas were in the cervical, 24% in the thoracic, and 14% in the conus region in our series. The median volume was 1.3 ml. A syrinx was found in 49% and a cyst in 32%. GTR was achieved in 89%, STR in three (8%), and PR in one patient (3%). Median follow-up was 114 months. PFS was 87%, 82%, and 82% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. OS was 97%, 88%, and 63% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. There was a significant difference in PFS depending on the extent of resection and in OS depending on the pre-operative clinical status. There was no significant difference in OS and PFS regarding the other examined influencing factors.
GTR resection was the most important factor influencing PFS. According to our results OS of IEs is much worse than that of spinal ependymomas. Our analysis confirms that patients with good pre-operative (McCormick grade 1 and 2) clinical status have significantly better OS than patients with McCormick grade 3 and higher.
KeywordsIntramedullary Ependymoma Spine tumour Prognosis
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interests
All authors certify that they have no affiliationswith or involvement in any organisation or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
For this type of study formal consent is not required.
- 1.Abdullah KG, Lubelski D, Miller J, Steinmetz MP, Shin JH, Krishnaney A, Mroz TE, Benzel EC (2015) Progression free survival and functional outcome after surgical resection of intramedullary ependymomas. Journal of clinical neuroscience: official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia 22:1933–1937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.06.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Adam Y, Benezech J, Blanquet A, Fuentes JM, Bousigue JY, Debono B, Duplessis E, Espagno C, Plas JY, Lescure JP, Destandau J, Hladky JP, Grunewald P, Mahla K, Remond J, Louis E (2010) Intramedullary tumors. Results of a national investigation in private neurosurgery. Neuro-Chirurgie 56:344–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2009.11.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Aghakhani N, David P, Parker F, Lacroix C, Benoudiba F, Tadie M (2008) Intramedullary spinal ependymomas: analysis of a consecutive series of 82 adult cases with particular attention to patients with no preoperative neurological deficit. Neurosurgery 62:1279–1285; discussion 1285-1276. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000333299.26566.15 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Bansal S, Ailawadhi P, Suri A, Kale SS, Sarat Chandra P, Singh M, Kumar R, Sharma BS, Mahapatra AK, Sharma MC, Sarkar C, Bithal P, Dash HH, Gaikwad S, Mishra NK (2013) Ten years' experience in the management of spinal intramedullary tumors in a single institution. Journal of clinical neuroscience: official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia 20:292–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2012.01.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Benes V (2010) Intramedulární astrocytom—soubor 15 pacientů a přehled literatury. Cesk Slov Neurol N 73:169–177Google Scholar
- 20.Garces-Ambrossi GL, McGirt MJ, Mehta VA, Sciubba DM, Witham TF, Bydon A, Wolinksy JP, Jallo GI, Gokaslan ZL (2009) Factors associated with progression-free survival and long-term neurological outcome after resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors: analysis of 101 consecutive cases. Journal of neurosurgery Spine 11:591–599. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.4.SPINE08159 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Giammattei L, Penet N, Parker F, Messerer M (2016) Intramedullary ependymoma: microsurgical resection technique. Neuro-Chirurgie. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2016.01.002
- 30.Iunes EA, Stavale JN, de Cassia Caldas Pessoa R, Ansai R, Onishi FJ, de Paiva Neto MA, de Padua BA, Cavalheiro S, Fleury Malheiros SM (2011) Multifocal intradural extramedullary ependymoma. Case report. Journal of neurosurgery Spine 14:65–70. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.9.SPINE09963 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Karikari IO, Nimjee SM, Hodges TR, Cutrell E, Hughes BD, Powers CJ, Mehta AI, Hardin C, Bagley CA, Isaacs RE, Haglund MM, Friedman AH (2015) Impact of tumor histology on resectability and neurological outcome in primary intramedullary spinal cord tumors: a single-center experience with 102 patients. Neurosurgery 76(Suppl 1):S4–13; discussion S13. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000462073.71915.12 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.Matsuyama Y, Sakai Y, Katayama Y, Imagama S, Ito Z, Wakao N, Sato K, Kamiya M, Yukawa Y, Kanemura T, Yanase M, Ishiguro N (2009) Surgical results of intramedullary spinal cord tumor with spinal cord monitoring to guide extent of resection. Journal of neurosurgery Spine 10:404–413. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.2.SPINE08698 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 47.Prokopienko M, Kunert P, Podgorska A, Marchel A (2017) Surgical treatment of intramedullary ependymomas. Neurol Neurochir Pol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pjnns.2017.06.008
- 49.Sandalcioglu IE, Gasser T, Asgari S, Lazorisak A, Engelhorn T, Egelhof T, Stolke D, Wiedemayer H (2005) Functional outcome after surgical treatment of intramedullary spinal cord tumors: experience with 78 patients. Spinal Cord 43:34–41. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101668 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 54.Sweeney KJ, Reynolds M, Farrell M, Bolger C (2016) Gross total resection rates of grade II/III intramedullary ependymomas using the surgical strategy of en-bloc resection without intra-operative neurophysiological monitoring. Br J Neurosurg 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2016.1270419