Advertisement

Microchimica Acta

, 185:283 | Cite as

Electrodes modified with 3D graphene composites: a review on methods for preparation, properties and sensing applications

Review Article
  • 183 Downloads

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) porous networks of planar 2D graphene have attractive features with respect to sensing. These include a large electroactive surface area, good inner and outer surface contact with the analyte, ease of loading with (bio)catalysts, and good electrochemical sensitivity. 3D free-standing graphene can even be used directly as an electrode. This review (with 140 refs.) covers the progress made in the past years. Following an introduction into the field (including definitions), a large section is presented that covers methods for the synthesis of 3D graphene (3DG) (including chemical vapor deposition, hydrothermal methods, lithography, support assisted synthesis and chemical deposition, and direct electrochemical methods). The next section covers the key features of 3DG and its composites for use in electrochemical sensors. This section is subdivided into sections on the uses of 3D porous graphene, 3DG composites with metals and metal oxides, composites consisting of 3DG and organic polymers, and electrodes modified with 3DG, 3DGs decorated with carbon nanotubes, and others. The review concludes with a discussion of future perspectives and current challenges.

Graphical Abstract

A schematic of the key characteristics of three-dimensional (3D) graphene

Keywords

Porous carbon Three-dimensional material Quantum dots Lithography Hydrothermal synthesis Chemical vapor deposition 3D printing Electrochemical sensor Biosensor Conductive polymer Nanoparticles 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support provided by the Chemistry Department at King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM).

Compliance with ethical standards

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Geim AK, Novoselov KS (2007) The rise of graphene. Nat Mater 6:183–191.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1849 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang S, Li Y, Wang S et al (2018) Advances in the use of carbonaceous materials for the electrochemical determination of persistent organic pollutants. A review. Microchim Acta 185:112.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-017-2638-9 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goutham S, Bykkam S, Sadasivuni KK et al (2018) Room temperature LPG resistive sensor based on the use of a few-layer graphene/SnO2 nanocomposite. Microchim Acta 185:69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-017-2537-0 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kawde A-N, Baig N, Sajid M (2016) Graphite pencil electrodes as electrochemical sensors for environmental analysis: a review of features, developments, and applications. RSC Adv 6:91325–91340.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA17466C Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Geim AK (2009) Graphene: status and prospects. Science (80- ) 324:1530–1534.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158877 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bollella P, Fusco G, Tortolini C et al (2017) Beyond graphene: electrochemical sensors and biosensors for biomarkers detection. Biosens Bioelectron 89:152–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.03.068 Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nair RR, Blake P, Grigorenko AN et al (2008) Fine structure constant defines visual transparency of graphene. Science (80- ) 320:1308–1308.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1156965 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cao X, Yin Z, Zhang H (2014) Three-dimensional graphene materials: preparation, structures and application in supercapacitors. Energy Environ Sci 7:1850–1865.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EE00050A Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pumera M, Ambrosi A, Bonanni A et al (2010) Graphene for electrochemical sensing and biosensing. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 29:954–965.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2010.05.011 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brownson DAC, Banks CE (2010) Graphene electrochemistry: an overview of potential applications. Analyst 135:2768.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c0an00590h Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gan T, Hu S (2011) Electrochemical sensors based on graphene materials. Microchim Acta 175:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-011-0639-7 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martín A, Escarpa A (2017) Tailor designed exclusive carbon nanomaterial electrodes for off-chip and on-chip electrochemical detection. Microchim Acta 184:307–313.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-016-2020-3 Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Dommett GHB et al (2006) Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 442:282–286.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04969 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cinti S, Arduini F (2017) Graphene-based screen-printed electrochemical (bio)sensors and their applications: efforts and criticisms. Biosens Bioelectron 89:107–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.07.005 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhu C, Yang G, Li H et al (2015) Electrochemical sensors and biosensors based on nanomaterials and nanostructures. Anal Chem 87:230–249.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac5039863 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mkhoyan KA, Contryman AW, Silcox J et al (2009) Atomic and electronic structure of graphene-oxide. Nano Lett 9:1058–1063.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl8034256 Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen D, Feng H, Li J (2012) Graphene oxide: preparation, functionalization, and electrochemical applications. Chem Rev 112:6027–6053.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300115g Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baig N, Kawde A-N (2015) A novel, fast and cost effective graphene-modified graphite pencil electrode for trace quantification of <scp>l</scp> −tyrosine. Anal Methods 7:9535–9541.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5AY01753J Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gómez-Navarro C, Meyer JC, Sundaram RS et al (2010) Atomic structure of reduced graphene oxide. Nano Lett 10:1144–1148.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl9031617 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pei S, Cheng H-M (2012) The reduction of graphene oxide. Carbon N Y 50:3210–3228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2011.11.010 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sun H, Wu L, Wei W, Qu X (2013) Recent advances in graphene quantum dots for sensing. Mater Today 16:433–442.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2013.10.020 Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wu C, Huang X, Wang G et al (2013) Highly conductive nanocomposites with three-dimensional, compactly interconnected graphene networks via a self-assembly process. Adv Funct Mater 23:506–513.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201201231 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dreyer DR, Park S, Bielawski CW, Ruoff RS (2010) The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem Soc Rev 39:228–240.  https://doi.org/10.1039/B917103G Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Joung D, Khondaker SI (2013) Structural evolution of reduced graphene oxide of varying carbon sp 2 fractions investigated via coulomb blockade transport. J Phys Chem C 117:26776–26782.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp408387b Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang Y, Hu A (2014) Carbon quantum dots: synthesis, properties and applications. J Mater Chem C 2:6921.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TC00988F Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pan D, Zhang J, Li Z, Wu M (2010) Hydrothermal route for cutting graphene sheets into blue-luminescent graphene quantum dots. Adv Mater 22:734–738.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200902825 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang C, Wei K, Zhang W et al (2017) Graphene oxide quantum dots incorporated into a thin film nanocomposite membrane with high flux and antifouling properties for low-pressure nanofiltration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:11082–11094.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b12826 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sinha A, Dhanjai JR et al (2018) Voltammetric sensing based on the use of advanced carbonaceous nanomaterials: a review. Microchim Acta 185:89.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-017-2626-0 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    De Adhikari A, Oraon R, Tiwari SK et al (2018) CdS-CoFe 2 O 4 @Reduced graphene oxide nanohybrid: an excellent electrode material for supercapacitor applications. Ind Eng Chem Res 57:1350–1360.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04885 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    He Y, Chen W, Li X et al (2013) Freestanding three-dimensional graphene/MnO 2 composite networks as ultralight and flexible supercapacitor electrodes. ACS Nano 7:174–182.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn304833s Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dong X-C, Xu H, Wang X-W et al (2012) 3D graphene–cobalt oxide electrode for high-performance supercapacitor and enzymeless glucose detection. ACS Nano 6:3206–3213.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn300097q Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang H, Gai P, Cheng R et al (2013) Self-assembly synthesis of a hierarchical structure using hollow nitrogen-doped carbon spheres as spacers to separate the reduced graphene oxide for simultaneous electrochemical determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid. Anal Methods 5:3591.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ay40572a Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Li Z-F, Zhang H, Liu Q et al (2013) Fabrication of high-surface-area graphene/polyaniline nanocomposites and their application in supercapacitors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:2685–2691.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am4001634 Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cui F, Zhang X (2012) Electrochemical sensor for epinephrine based on a glassy carbon electrode modified with graphene/gold nanocomposites. J Electroanal Chem 669:35–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2012.01.021 Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Liu H, Chen X, Huang L et al (2014) Palladium nanoparticles embedded into graphene nanosheets: preparation, characterization, and nonenzymatic electrochemical detection of H 2 O 2. Electroanalysis 26:556–564.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201300428 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rakhi RB, Chen W, Cha D, Alshareef HN (2011) High performance supercapacitors using metal oxide anchored graphene nanosheet electrodes. J Mater Chem 21:16197.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm12963e Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Li M, Tang Z, Leng M, Xue J (2014) Flexible solid-state supercapacitor based on graphene-based hybrid films. Adv Funct Mater 24:7495–7502.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201402442 Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fu K, Wang Y, Mao L et al (2016) Facile one-pot synthesis of graphene-porous carbon nanofibers hybrid support for Pt nanoparticles with high activity towards oxygen reduction. Electrochim Acta 215:427–434.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.08.111 Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nardecchia S, Carriazo D, Ferrer ML et al (2013) Three dimensional macroporous architectures and aerogels built of carbon nanotubes and/or graphene: synthesis and applications. Chem Soc Rev 42:794–830.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35353A Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Li C, Zhang X, Wang K et al (2015) Three dimensional graphene networks for supercapacitor electrode materials. New Carbon Mater 30:193–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-5805(15)60185-8 Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Song Y-Y, Zhang D, Gao W, Xia X-H (2005) Nonenzymatic glucose detection by using a three-dimensionally ordered, macroporous platinum template. Chem Eur J 11:2177–2182.  https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200400981 Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Niu X, Lan M, Zhao H, Chen C (2013) Highly sensitive and selective nonenzymatic detection of glucose using three-dimensional porous nickel nanostructures. Anal Chem 85:3561–3569.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac3030976 Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wang D-W, Li F, Liu M et al (2008) 3D aperiodic hierarchical porous graphitic carbon material for high-rate electrochemical capacitive energy storage. Angew Chemie Int Ed 47:373–376.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200702721 Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Li J, Cassell A, Delzeit L et al (2002) Novel three-dimensional electrodes: electrochemical properties of carbon nanotube ensembles. J Phys Chem B 106:9299–9305.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp021201n Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wang L, Zhang Y, Yu J et al (2017) A green and simple strategy to prepare graphene foam-like three-dimensional porous carbon/Ni nanoparticles for glucose sensing. Sensors Actuators B Chem 239:172–179.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.06.173 Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Varley TS, Hirani M, Harrison G, Holt KB (2014) Nanodiamond surface redox chemistry: influence of physicochemical properties on catalytic processes. Faraday Discuss 172:349–364.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4FD00041B Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Qin D, Gao S, Wang L et al (2017) Three-dimensional carbon nanofiber derived from bacterial cellulose for use in a Nafion matrix on a glassy carbon electrode for simultaneous voltammetric determination of trace levels of Cd(II) and Pb(II). Microchim Acta 184:2759–2766.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-017-2260-x Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Huang D, Li X, Wang S et al (2017) Three-dimensional chemically reduced graphene oxide templated by silica spheres for ammonia sensing. Sensors Actuators B Chem 252:956–964.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.05.117 Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Yong Y-C, Dong X-C, Chan-Park MB et al (2012) Macroporous and monolithic anode based on polyaniline hybridized three-dimensional graphene for high-performance microbial fuel cells. ACS Nano 6:2394–2400.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn204656d Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Prasad KP, Chen Y, Chen P (2014) Three-dimensional graphene-carbon nanotube hybrid for high-performance enzymatic biofuel cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:3387–3393.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am405432b Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wu Z-S, Sun Y, Tan Y-Z et al (2012) Three-dimensional graphene-based macro- and mesoporous frameworks for high-performance electrochemical capacitive energy storage. J Am Chem Soc 134:19532–19535.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja308676h Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Paek S, Yoo E, Honma I (2009) Enhanced cyclic performance and lithium storage capacity of SnO 2 /Graphene nanoporous electrodes with three-dimensionally delaminated flexible structure. Nano Lett 9:72–75.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl802484w Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zhang Y, Chu M, Yang L et al (2014) Three-dimensional graphene networks as a new substrate for immobilization of laccase and dopamine and its application in glucose/O 2 biofuel cell. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:12808–12814.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am502791h Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Luo J, Liu J, Zeng Z et al (2013) Three-dimensional graphene foam supported Fe 3 O 4 lithium battery anodes with long cycle life and high rate capability. Nano Lett 13:6136–6143.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl403461n Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lee SH, Kim HW, Hwang JO et al (2010) Three-dimensional self-assembly of graphene oxide platelets into mechanically flexible macroporous carbon films. Angew Chemie Int Ed 49:10084–10088.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201006240 Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Xu Y, Lin Z, Huang X et al (2013) Flexible solid-state supercapacitors based on three-dimensional graphene hydrogel films. ACS Nano 7:4042–4049.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn4000836 Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Cao X, Shi Y, Shi W et al (2013) Preparation of MoS 2 -coated three-dimensional graphene networks for high-performance anode material in lithium-ion batteries. Small 9:3433–3438.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201202697 Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Ito Y, Tanabe Y, Sugawara K et al (2017) Three-dimensional porous graphene networks expand graphene-based electronic device applications. Phys Chem Chem Phys.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP07667C
  59. 59.
    Yang Y, Kang M, Fang S et al (2015) Electrochemical biosensor based on three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide and polyaniline nanocomposite for selective detection of mercury ions. Sensors Actuators B Chem 214:63–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.02.127 Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Dong X, Cao Y, Wang J et al (2012) Hybrid structure of zinc oxide nanorods and three dimensional graphene foam for supercapacitor and electrochemical sensor applications. RSC Adv 2:4364.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ra01295b Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Fang Q, Shen Y, Chen B (2015) Synthesis, decoration and properties of three-dimensional graphene-based macrostructures: a review. Chem Eng J 264:753–771.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.12.001 Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Xia XH, Chao DL, Zhang YQ et al (2014) Three-dimensional graphene and their integrated electrodes. Nano Today 9:785–807.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2014.12.001 Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Sherrell PC, Mattevi C (2016) Mesoscale design of multifunctional 3D graphene networks. Mater Today 19:428–436.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2015.12.004 Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Xi F, Zhao D, Wang X, Chen P (2013) Non-enzymatic detection of hydrogen peroxide using a functionalized three-dimensional graphene electrode. Electrochem Commun 26:81–84.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2012.10.017 Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Cao X, Shi Y, Shi W et al (2011) Preparation of novel 3D graphene networks for supercapacitor applications. Small 7:3163–3168.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201100990 Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Chen Z, Ren W, Gao L et al (2011) Three-dimensional flexible and conductive interconnected graphene networks grown by chemical vapour deposition. Nat Mater 10:424–428.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3001 Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Cao X, Zeng Z, Shi W et al (2013) Three-Dimensional Graphene Network Composites for Detection of Hydrogen Peroxide. Small 9:1703–1707.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201200683 Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Dong X, Wang X, Wang L et al (2012) 3D graphene foam as a monolithic and macroporous carbon electrode for electrochemical sensing. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:3129–3133.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am300459m Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Di Bernardo I, Avvisati G, Chen C et al (2018) Topology and doping effects in three-dimensional nanoporous graphene. Carbon N Y 131:258–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.01.076 Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Wang X, Zhang Y, Zhi C et al (2013) Three-dimensional strutted graphene grown by substrate-free sugar blowing for high-power-density supercapacitors. Nat Commun 4:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3905 Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Yuan M, Liu A, Zhao M et al (2014) Bimetallic PdCu nanoparticle decorated three-dimensional graphene hydrogel for non-enzymatic amperometric glucose sensor. Sensors Actuators B Chem 190:707–714.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2013.09.054 Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Xu Y, Sheng K, Li C, Shi G (2010) Self-assembled graphene hydrogel via a one-step hydrothermal process. ACS Nano 4:4324–4330.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn101187z Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Chen P, Yang J-J, Li S-S et al (2013) Hydrothermal synthesis of macroscopic nitrogen-doped graphene hydrogels for ultrafast supercapacitor. Nano Energy 2:249–256.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2012.09.003 Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Xiao X, Roberts ME, Wheeler DR et al (2010) Increased mass transport at lithographically defined 3-D porous carbon electrodes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2:3179–3184.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am1006595 Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Xiao X, Beechem T, Wheeler DR et al (2014) Lithographically defined porous Ni–carbon nanocomposite supercapacitors. Nano 6:2629–2633.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3NR05751H Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Xiao X, Beechem TE, Brumbach MT et al (2012) Lithographically defined three-dimensional graphene structures. ACS Nano 6:3573–3579.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn300655c Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Byeon JH, Park D, Kim JY (2015) An aerosol-based soft lithography to fabricate nanoscale silver dots and rings for spectroscopic applications. Nano 7:2271–2275.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4NR07476A Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Liu F, Piao Y, Choi JS, Seo TS (2013) Three-dimensional graphene micropillar based electrochemical sensor for phenol detection. Biosens Bioelectron 50:387–392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2013.06.055 Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Sun G, Lu J, Ge S et al (2013) Ultrasensitive electrochemical immunoassay for carcinoembryonic antigen based on three-dimensional macroporous gold nanoparticles/graphene composite platform and multienzyme functionalized nanoporous silver label. Anal Chim Acta 775:85–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2013.03.009 Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Choi BG, Yang M, Hong WH et al (2012) 3D macroporous graphene frameworks for supercapacitors with high energy and power densities. ACS Nano 6:4020–4028.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn3003345 Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Shao Q, Tang J, Lin Y et al (2013) Synthesis and characterization of graphene hollow spheres for application in supercapacitors. J Mater Chem A 1:15423.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ta12789c Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Yu B, Kuang D, Liu S et al (2014) Template-assisted self-assembly method to prepare three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide for dopamine sensing. Sensors Actuators B Chem 205:120–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.08.038 Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Luo J, Ma Q, Gu H et al (2015) Three-dimensional graphene-polyaniline hybrid hollow spheres by layer-by-layer assembly for application in supercapacitor. Electrochim Acta 173:184–192.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.053 Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Gao W (2015) The chemistry of graphene oxide. graphene oxide. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 61–95Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Sheng K, Sun Y, Li C et al (2012) Ultrahigh-rate supercapacitors based on eletrochemically reduced graphene oxide for ac line-filtering. Sci Rep 2:247.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00247 PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Chen K, Chen L, Chen Y et al (2012) Three-dimensional porous graphene-based composite materials: electrochemical synthesis and application. J Mater Chem 22:20968.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm34816k Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Shi F, Xi J, Hou F et al (2016) Application of three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide-gold composite modified electrode for direct electrochemistry and electrocatalysis of myoglobin. Mater Sci Eng C 58:450–457.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.08.049 Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Cui M, Xu B, Hu C et al (2013) Direct electrochemistry and electrocatalysis of glucose oxidase on three-dimensional interpenetrating, porous graphene modified electrode. Electrochim Acta 98:48–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.03.040 Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Sun W, Hou F, Gong S et al (2015) Direct electrochemistry and electrocatalysis of hemoglobin on three-dimensional graphene modified carbon ionic liquid electrode. Sensors Actuators B Chem 219:331–337.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2015.05.015 Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Zhu C, Han TY-J, Duoss EB et al (2015) Highly compressible 3D periodic graphene aerogel microlattices. Nat Commun 6:6962.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7962 PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Jeon MS, Jeon Y, Hwang JH et al (2018) Fabrication of three-dimensional porous carbon scaffolds with tunable pore sizes for effective cell confinement. Carbon N Y 130:814–821.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2018.01.050 Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Shi Q, Cha Y, Song Y et al (2016) 3D graphene-based hybrid materials: synthesis and applications in energy storage and conversion. Nano 8:15414–15447.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6NR04770J Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Zhang R, Cao Y, Li P et al (2014) Three-dimensional porous graphene sponges assembled with the combination of surfactant and freeze-drying. Nano Res 7:1477–1487.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-014-0508-x Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Lu L, Guo L, Kang T, Cheng S (2017) A gold electrode modified with a three-dimensional graphene-DNA composite for sensitive voltammetric determination of dopamine. Microchim Acta 184:2949–2957.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-017-2267-3 Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Wang G, Wang B, Wang X et al (2009) Sn/graphene nanocomposite with 3D architecture for enhanced reversible lithium storage in lithium ion batteries. J Mater Chem 19:8378.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b914650d Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Liu L, Feng T, Wang C et al (2014) Magnetic three-dimensional graphene nanoparticles for the preconcentration of endocrine-disrupting phenols. Microchim Acta 181:1249–1255.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-014-1234-5 Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Amiri A, Ghaemi F (2017) Microextraction in packed syringe by using a three-dimensional carbon nanotube/carbon nanofiber–graphene nanostructure coupled to dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for the determination of phthalate esters in water samples. Microchim Acta 184:3851–3858.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-017-2416-8 Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Chen Z, Li H, Tian R et al (2016) Three dimensional graphene aerogels as binder-less, freestanding, elastic and high-performance electrodes for lithium-ion batteries. Sci Rep 6:27365.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27365 PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Chen M, Hou C, Huo D et al (2017) A sensitive electrochemical DNA biosensor based on three-dimensional nitrogen-doped graphene and Fe 3 O 4 nanoparticles. Sensors Actuators B Chem 239:421–429.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.08.036 Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Baig N, Sajid M (2017) Applications of layered double hydroxides based electrochemical sensors for determination of environmental pollutants: a review. Trends Environ Anal Chem 16:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teac.2017.10.003 Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Yu X, Lu B, Xu Z (2014) Super long-life supercapacitors based on the construction of nanohoneycomb-like strongly coupled CoMoO 4 -3D graphene hybrid electrodes. Adv Mater 26:1044–1051.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201304148 Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Baig N, Kawde A-N (2016) A cost-effective disposable graphene-modified electrode decorated with alternating layers of Au NPs for the simultaneous detection of dopamine and uric acid in human urine. RSC Adv 6:80756–80765.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA10055D Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Yu X, Sheng K, Shi G (2014) A three-dimensional interpenetrating electrode of reduced graphene oxide for selective detection of dopamine. Analyst 139:4525–4531.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4AN00604F Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Ruiyi L, Haiyan Z, Zaijun L, Junkang L (2018) Electrochemical determination of acetaminophen using a glassy carbon electrode modified with a hybrid material consisting of graphene aerogel and octadecylamine-functionalized carbon quantum dots. Microchim Acta 185:145.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-018-2688-7 Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Gao X, Yue H, Song S et al (2018) 3-Dimensional hollow graphene balls for voltammetric sensing of levodopa in the presence of uric acid. Microchim Acta 185:91.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-017-2644-y Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Zhang X, Ju H, Wang J, Zhang X (2008) Nitric oxide (NO) electrochemical sensors. Electrochem. Sensors, Biosens. their Biomed. Appl. Elsevier, pp 1–29Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Ng SR, Guo CX, Li CM (2011) Highly sensitive nitric oxide sensing using three-dimensional graphene/ionic liquid nanocomposite. Electroanalysis 23:442–448.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201000344 Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Kawde A-N, Aziz MA, El-Zohri M et al (2017) Cathodized gold nanoparticle-modified graphite pencil electrode for non-enzymatic sensitive voltammetric detection of glucose. Electroanalysis 29:1214–1221.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201600709 Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Kawde A-N, Aziz M, Baig N, Temerk Y (2015) A facile fabrication of platinum nanoparticle-modified graphite pencil electrode for highly sensitive detection of hydrogen peroxide. J Electroanal Chem 740:68–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2015.01.005 Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Yuan Y, Zheng Y, Liu J et al (2017) Non-enzymatic amperometric hydrogen peroxide sensor using a glassy carbon electrode modified with gold nanoparticles deposited on CVD-grown graphene. Microchim Acta 184:4723–4729.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-017-2499-2 Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Wang L, Qin K, Li J et al (2018) Doping and controllable pore size enhanced electrochemical performance of free-standing 3D graphene films. Appl Surf Sci 427:598–604.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.08.204 Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Zhu Q, Bao J, Huo D et al (2017) 3D Graphene hydrogel – gold nanoparticles nanocomposite modified glassy carbon electrode for the simultaneous determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid. Sensors Actuators B Chem 238:1316–1323.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SNB.2016.09.116 Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Kung C-C, Lin P-Y, Buse FJ et al (2014) Preparation and characterization of three dimensional graphene foam supported platinum–ruthenium bimetallic nanocatalysts for hydrogen peroxide based electrochemical biosensors. Biosens Bioelectron 52:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2013.08.025 Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Maiyalagan T, Dong X, Chen P, Wang X (2012) Electrodeposited Pt on three-dimensional interconnected graphene as a free-standing electrode for fuel cell application. J Mater Chem 22:5286.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm16541d Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Dechtrirat D, Sookcharoenpinyo B, Prajongtat P et al (2018) An electrochemical MIP sensor for selective detection of salbutamol based on a graphene/PEDOT:PSS modified screen printed carbon electrode. RSC Adv 8:206–212.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA09601A Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Mazloum-Ardakani M, Barazesh B, Khoshroo A et al (2018) A new composite consisting of electrosynthesized conducting polymers, graphene sheets and biosynthesized gold nanoparticles for biosensing acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Bioelectrochemistry 121:38–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2017.12.010 Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Wang M-H, Ji B-W, Gu X-W et al (2018) Direct electrodeposition of graphene enhanced conductive polymer on microelectrode for biosensing application. Biosens Bioelectron 99:99–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2017.07.030 Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Lei W, Si W, Xu Y et al (2014) Conducting polymer composites with graphene for use in chemical sensors and biosensors. Microchim Acta 181:707–722.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-014-1160-6 Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Tanaka Y, Oda S, Yamaguchi H et al (2007) 15 N− 15 N J -coupling across Hg II : direct observation of Hg II -mediated T−T base pairs in a DNA duplex. J Am Chem Soc 129:244–245.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja065552h Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Peng DL, Ji HF, Dong XD et al (2016) Highly sensitive electrochemical bioassay for Hg(II) detection based on plasma-polymerized propargylamine and three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 36:1051–1065.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-016-9707-4 Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Liu J, Wang J, Wang T et al (2015) Three-dimensional electrochemical immunosensor for sensitive detection of carcinoembryonic antigen based on monolithic and macroporous graphene foam. Biosens Bioelectron 65:281–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2014.10.016 Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Cheng Q, Tang J, Ma J et al (2011) Graphene and carbon nanotube composite electrodes for supercapacitors with ultra-high energy density. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13:17615.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cp21910c Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Liu J, Wang X, Wang T et al (2014) Functionalization of monolithic and porous three-dimensional graphene by one-step chitosan electrodeposition for enzymatic biosensor. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:19997–20002.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am505547f Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Fernandes R, Wu L-Q, Chen T et al (2003) Electrochemically induced deposition of a polysaccharide hydrogel onto a patterned surface. Langmuir 19:4058–4062.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la027052h Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Luo X-L, Xu J-J, Du Y, Chen H-Y (2004) A glucose biosensor based on chitosan–glucose oxidase–gold nanoparticles biocomposite formed by one-step electrodeposition. Anal Biochem 334:284–289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2004.07.005 Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Maaoui H, Singh SK, Teodorescu F et al (2017) Copper oxide supported on three-dimensional ammonia-doped porous reduced graphene oxide prepared through electrophoretic deposition for non-enzymatic glucose sensing. Electrochim Acta 224:346–354.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2016.12.078 Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Tian Y, Wei Z, Zhang K et al (2017) Three-dimensional phosphorus-doped graphene as an efficient metal-free electrocatalyst for electrochemical sensing. Sensors Actuators B Chem 241:584–591.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2016.10.113 Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Xu J, Wang Y, Hu S (2017) Nanocomposites of graphene and graphene oxides: synthesis, molecular functionalization and application in electrochemical sensors and biosensors. A review. Microchim Acta 184:1–44.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-016-2007-0 Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Chen M, Su H, Mao L et al (2018) Highly sensitive electrochemical DNA sensor based on the use of three-dimensional nitrogen-doped graphene. Microchim Acta 185:51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00604-017-2588-2 Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Mazaheri M, Aashuri H, Simchi A (2017) Three-dimensional hybrid graphene/nickel electrodes on zinc oxide nanorod arrays as non-enzymatic glucose biosensors. Sensors Actuators B Chem 251:462–471.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2017.05.062 Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    Kim B-J, Yang G, Joo Park M et al (2013) Three-dimensional graphene foam-based transparent conductive electrodes in GaN-based blue light-emitting diodes. Appl Phys Lett 102:161902.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4801763 Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Lv W, Tao Y, Ni W et al (2011) One-pot self-assembly of three-dimensional graphene macroassemblies with porous core and layered shell. J Mater Chem 21:12352.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c1jm11728a Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Jiang X, Ma Y, Li J et al (2010) Self-assembly of reduced graphene oxide into three-dimensional architecture by divalent ion linkage. J Phys Chem C 114:22462–22465.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp108081g Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Piner RD et al (2007) Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon N Y 45:1558–1565.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034 Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Shao Y, Wang J, Engelhard M et al (2010) Facile and controllable electrochemical reduction of graphene oxide and its applications. J Mater Chem 20:743–748.  https://doi.org/10.1039/B917975E Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Erickson K, Erni R, Lee Z et al (2010) Determination of the local chemical structure of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide. Adv Mater 22:4467–4472.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201000732 Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Li N, Zhang Q, Gao S et al (2013) Three-dimensional graphene foam as a biocompatible and conductive scaffold for neural stem cells. Sci Rep 3:1604.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01604 PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Dong X, Wang J, Wang J et al (2012) Supercapacitor electrode based on three-dimensional graphene–polyaniline hybrid. Mater Chem Phys 134:576–580.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.03.066 Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Yang Z, Yan C, Liu J et al (2015) Designing 3D graphene networks via a 3D-printed Ni template. RSC Adv 5:29397–29400.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA03454J Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Yang Z, Chabi S, Xia Y, Zhu Y (2015) Preparation of 3D graphene-based architectures and their applications in supercapacitors. Prog Nat Sci Mater Int 25:554–562.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2015.11.010 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemistry DepartmentKing Fahd University of Petroleum and MineralsDhahranSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations