This paper examines the quasi-static behaviour of a non-mated rock fracture during the first and second loading cycles. Asperity deformation, substrate deformation, asperity interaction and gouge production are included in the modelling. The composite topography assumption is revisited, and the irregular fracture topography is idealized by representing the asperities as ellipsoidal surfaces. It is shown that the modelling can capture the closure behaviour and hysteresis response of rock fractures on both the first and second loading–unloading cycles with an acceptable accuracy. The model is then used to examine sensitivity of deformation behaviours to mechanical properties. It is shown that Young’s modulus of the rock is the most sensitive parameter with regard to the estimation of the closure behaviour of joints, followed by the compressive strength of the material, while the deformation is independent of the Poisson’s ratio variations in the range of ± 0.1. Moreover, while the closure behaviour is sensitive to variations in the joint roughness coefficient on the first loading cycle, this sensitivity reduces considerably on the second cycle.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Adler PM (1992) Porous media: geometry and transports. Butterworth-Heinemann, London
Aleynikov SM (2011) Spatial contact problems in geotechnics-boundary element method. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Aliabadi M, Brebbia CA (1993) Computational methods in contact mechanics. Computational Mech Publ, Southampton
Ameli P, Elkhoury JE, Morris JP, Detwiler RL (2014) Fracture permeability alteration due to chemical and mechanical processes: a coupled high-resolution model. Rock Mech Rock Eng 47:1563–1573
Augustinus PC, Selby MJ (1990) Rock slope development in McMurdo Oasis, Antarctica, and implications for interpretations of glacial history. Geographysika Annalen A 72:55–62
Bandis SC, Lumsden AC, Barton NR (1983) Fundamentals of rock joint deformation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 20:249–268
Bart M, Shao JF, Lydzba D, Haji-Sotoudeh M (2004) Coupled hydromechanical modeling of rock fractures under normal stress. Can Geotech J 41:686–697
Barton N, Choubey V (1977) The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech 10:1–54
Barton N, Stephansson O (1990) Rock joints. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Rock Joints. Loen: AA Balkema
Barton N, Bandis S, Bakhtar K (1985) Strength, deformation and conductivity coupling of rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 22:121–140
Boulon MJ, Selvadurai APS, Benjelloun H, Feuga B (1993) Influence of rock joint degradation on hydraulic conductivity. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 30:1311–1317
Brown SR, Scholz CH (1985) Closure of random elastic surfaces in contact. J Geophys Res 90:5531–5545
Gercek H (2007) Poisson’s ratio values for rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44:1–13
Gladwell GML (1980) Contact problems in the classical theory of elasticity. Sijthoff & Noordhoff, The Netherlands
Greenwood JA, Williamson JP (1966) Contact of nominally flat surfaces. P Roy Soc Lond A Mat 295:300–319
Hertz H (1882) Uber die Beruhrung fester elastischer Korper. J fur die Reine Angewandte Mathematic 92:156–171
Ivars DM, Pierce ME, Darcel C, Reyes-Montes J, Potyondy DO, Young RP, Cundall PA (2011) The synthetic rock mass approach for jointed rock mass modelling. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48:219–244
Jaeger JC (1971) Friction of rocks and stability of rock slopes. Geotechnique 21:97–134
Johnson KL (1985) Contact mechanics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kamali A, Pournik M (2016) Fracture closure and conductivity decline modeling—application in unpropped and acid etched fractures. J Unconventional Oil Gas Res 14:44–55
Marache A, Riss J, Gentier S (2008) Experimental and modelled mechanical behaviour of a rock fracture under normal stress. Rock Mech Rock Engng 41:869–892
Misra A, Huang S (2012) Micromechanical stress-displacement model for rough interfaces: Effect of asperity contact orientation on closure and shear behaviour. Int J Solids Structures 49:111–120
Montgomery DC (2009) Design and analysis of experiments. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey
Newman JC, Elber W (1988) Mechanical of fatigue crack closure. ASTM, Philadelphia
Nguyen TS, Selvadurai APS (1998) A model for coupled mechanical and hydraulic behaviour of a rock joint. Int J Numer Anal Met 22:29–48
Popov VL (2010) Contact mechanics and friction. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Physical principles and applications
Pyrak-Nolte LJ, Morris JP (2000) Single fractures under normal stress: the relation between fracture specific stiffness and fluid flow. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:245–262
Rezaei Niya SM, Selvadurai APS (2019) Correlation of joint roughness coefficient and permeability of a fracture. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 113:150–162
Rezaei Niya SM, Phillips RK, Hoorfar M (2016) Sensitivity analysis of the impedance characteristics of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Fuel Cells 16:547–556
Selvadurai APS (1979) Elastic analysis of soil-foundation interaction. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Selvadurai APS (2004) Stationary damage modelling of poroelastic contact. Int J Solids Struct 41:2043–2064
Selvadurai APS, Atluri SN (eds) (2010) Contact mechanics in the engineering sciences. Tech Science Press, GA
Selvadurai APS (2015) Normal stress-induced permeability hysteresis of a fracture in a granite cylinder. Geofluids 15:37–47
Selvadurai APS (2020) In-plane loading of a bonded rigid disc embedded at a pre-compressed elastic interface: the role of non-linear interface responses. Mech Syst Signal Processing 144:106871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106871
Selvadurai APS, Boulon MJ (1995) Mechanics of geomaterial interfaces, Studies in applied mechanics, vol 42. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Selvadurai PA, Glaser SD (2015) Laboratory-developed contact models controlling instability on frictional faults. J Geophys Res 120:4208–4236
Selvadurai APS, Głowacki A (2017) Stress-induced permeability alterations in an argillaceous limestone. Rock Mech Rock Eng 50:1079–1096
Selvadurai APS, Nguyen TS (1999) Mechanics and fluid transport in a degradable discontinuity. Eng Geol 53:243–249
Selvadurai APS, Yu Q (2005) Mechanics of a discontinuity in a geomaterial. Comput Geotech 32:92–106
Selvadurai APS, Suvorov AP, Selvadurai PA (2015) Thermo-hydro-mechanical processes in fractured rock formations during a glacial advance. Geosci Model Dev 8:2167–2185
Selvadurai PA, Parker JM, Glaser SD (2017) Numerical modeling describing the effects of heterogeneous distributions of asperities on the quasi-static evolution of frictional slip. Rock Mech Rock Engng 50:3323–3335
Selvadurai APS, Selvadurai PA, Suvorov AP (2018) Contact mechanics of a dilatant region located at a compressed elastic interface. Int J Eng Sci 133:144–168
Shi JQ, Durucan S (2016) Near-exponential relationship between effective stress and permeability of porous rocks revealed in Gangi’s phenomenological models and application to gas shales. Int J Coal Geol 154–155:111–122
Tang ZC, Liu QS, Xia CC, Song YL, Huang JH, Wang CB (2014) Mechanical model for predicting closure behavior of rock joints under normal stress. Rock Mech Rock Engng 47:2287–2298
Tang ZC, Jiao YY, Wong LNY (2017) Theoretical model with multi-asperity interaction for the closure behavior of rock joint. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 97:15–23
Vogler D, Settgast RR, Annavarapu C, Madonna C, Bayer P, Amann F (2018) Experiments and simulations of fully hydro-mechanically coupled response of rough fractures exposed to high-pressure fluid injection. J Geophys Res 123:1186–1200
Willner K (2003) Kontinuums- und kontaktmechanik. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Synthetische und analytische Darstellung
Wriggers P, Laursen TA (2007) Computational contact mechanics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Niya, S.M.R., Selvadurai, A.P.S. Modeling the Approach of Non-mated Rock Fracture Surfaces Under Quasi-static Normal Load Cycles. Rock Mech Rock Eng (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-020-02349-z
- Closure behaviour
- Normal stress
- Rock fracture
- Sensitivity analysis