Few-Body Systems

, 59:31 | Cite as

Exclusive Meson Electroweak production off Bound Nucleons

Part of the following topical collections:
  1. NSTAR 2017


The effects of final state interaction in electroweak pion production reactions have been studied. The one loop corrections to the impulse approximation due to the nucleon and the pion rescattering is evaluated using the ANL-Osaka dynamical coupled channel model for the meson production reactions. It is found the final state interaction will affects the \(\nu N\) cross section extracted in the previous analysis of the \(\nu d\) data.


  1. 1.
    L. Alvarez-Ruso et al., NuSTEC white paper: status and challenges of neutrino-nucleus scattering, in Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. (to appear)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S.J. Barish et al., Study of neutrino interactions in hydrogen and deuterium: inelastic charged current reactions. Phys. Rev. D 19, 2521 (1979).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.19.2521 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    I. Blomqvist, J.M. Laget, A nonrelativistic operator convenient for analysis of pion photoproduction on nuclei in the delta (1236) region. Nucl. Phys. A 280, 405–428 (1977).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(77)90613-3 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Kamano, Electromagnetic N* transition form factors in the ANL-Osaka dynamical coupled-channels approach, in These proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Kamano, S.X. Nakamura, T.S.H. Lee, T. Sato, Nucleon resonances within a dynamical coupled-channels model of \(\pi N\) and \(\gamma N\) reactions. Phys. Rev. C88(3), 035–209 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.035209 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Kitagaki et al., Charged current exclusive pion production in neutrino deuterium interactions. Phys. Rev. D 34, 2554–2565 (1986).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.34.2554 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Kitagaki et al., Study of \(\nu d \rightarrow \mu ^{-} p p_s\) and \(\nu d \rightarrow \mu ^{-} \Delta ^{++}(1232) n_s\) using the BNL 7-foot deuterium filled bubble chamber. Phys. Rev. D 42, 1331–1338 (1990).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.42.1331
  8. 8.
    A. Matsuyama, T.S.H. Lee, Unitary meson exchange calculation of \(N N \rightarrow N N \pi \) reaction. Phys. Rev. C 34, 1900–1910 (1986).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.34.1900 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Matsuyama, T. Sato, T.S.H. Lee, Dynamical coupled-channel model of meson production reactions in the nucleon resonance region. Phys. Rept. 439, 193–253 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2006.12.003 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S.X. Nakamura, H. Kamano, T. Sato, Dynamical coupled-channels model for neutrino-induced meson productions in resonance region. Phys. Rev. D92(7), 024–074 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.074024 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S.X. Nakamura et al., Towards a unified model of neutrino–nucleus reactions for neutrino oscillation experiments. Rept. Prog. Phys. 80(5), 056–301 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa5e6c CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S.X. Nakmaura, Photo- and electro-excitation of bound neutrons and protons, in These proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    G.M. Radecky et al., Study of Single Pion Production by Weak Charged Currents in Low-energy Neutrino \(d\) Interactions. Phys. Rev. D 25, 1161–1173 (1982).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.25.1161,  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.26.3297. [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D26,3297(1982)]
  14. 14.
    T. Sato, H. Ohtsubo, K. Koshigiri, Electron scattering and charged pion photoproduction on \(^{12}C\) and \(^{13}C\). Z. Phys. A 320, 507–519 (1985).  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01415729 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Sato, D. Uno, T.S.H. Lee, Dynamical model of weak pion production reactions. Phys. Rev. C67, 065–201 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.67.065201 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Schwamb, Unified description of hadronic and electromagnetic reactions of the two-nucleon system. Phys. Rept. 485, 109–193 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.10.002 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    N. Suzuki, T. Sato, T.S.H. Lee, Extraction of resonances from meson–nucleon reactions. Phys. Rev. C79, 025–205 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.025205 Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    N. Suzuki, T. Sato, T.S.H. Lee, Extraction of electromagnetic transition form factors for nucleon resonances within a dynamical coupled-channels model. Phys. Rev. C82, 045–206 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.045206 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    V.E. Tarasov, W.J. Briscoe, M. Dieterle, B. Krusche, A.E. Kudryavtsev, M. Ostrick, I.I. Strakovsky, On the extraction of cross sections for \(\pi ^0\) and \(\eta \) photoproduction off neutrons from deuteron data. Phys. Atom. Nucl. 79(2), 216–227 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778816020186 ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    C. Wilkinson, P. Rodrigues, S. Cartwright, L. Thompson, K. McFarland, Reanalysis of bubble chamber measurements of muon-neutrino induced single pion production. Phys. Rev. D90(11), 017–112 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.112017 Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.J. Wu, T. Sato, T.S.H. Lee, Incoherent pion production in neutrino-deuteron interactions. Phys. Rev. C91(3), 035–203 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.035203 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsOsaka UniversityToyonakaJapan

Personalised recommendations