Abstract
Purpose
The objective of the current study was to assess the therapeutic benefit of lymphadenectomy according to the extent of lymphadenectomy.
Methods
Patients undergoing colectomy for right‐sided colon cancer were identified. Distribution of lymph node metastases (DLNM) of 1, 2 and 3 were defined as lymph node metastasis (LNM) in the pericolic nodes, the intermediate nodes and the front of the SMV near the origin of the major artery, respectively. The therapeutic index (TI) was calculated based on the frequency of LNM and the 5 year overall survival (OS) rate of patients with LNM.
Results
Among 344 patients who met the inclusion criteria, roughly half had LNM (n = 150, 43.7%). While 107 (31.1%) and 30 (8.7%) patients had DLNM1 and DLNM2, respectively, only 13 patients (3.8%) were defined as DLNM3. However, there was no significant difference in 5 year OS by DLNM (DLNM1 71.1%, DLNM2 78.7%, DLNM3 50.4%, p = 0.61). Overall, the TI of lymphadenectomy for D3 area was approximately 1/10 of the TI for D1 (1.9 vs.22.1), given the low frequency of LNM (3.8%) and poor 5 year OS of patients with LNM (50.4%). This trend was consistent irrespective of primary tumor locations.
Conclusion
The survival benefit from central lymphadenectomy namely D3 was low among patients with right‐sided colon cancers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Enker WE, Thaler HT, Cranor ML, Polyak T. Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;181(4):335–46.
Heald RJ, Moran BJ, Ryall RD, Sexton R, MacFarlane JK. Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978–1997. Arch surg. 1998;133(8):894–9.
Heald RJ, Ryall RD. Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1986;1(8496):1479–82.
West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, Perrakis A, Finan PJ, Quirke P. Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J clin oncol. 2010;28(2):272–8.
Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, Papadopoulos T, Merkel S. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation–technical notes and outcome. Colorectal dis. 2009;11(4):354–64.
Emmanuel A, Haji A. Complete mesocolic excision and extended (D3) lymphadenectomy for colonic cancer: is it worth that extra effort? A review of the literature. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016;31(4):797–804.
Tagliacozzo S, Tocchi A. Extended mesenteric excision in right hemicolectomy for carcinoma of the colon. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997;12(5):272–5.
Kanemitsu Y, Komori K, Kimura K, Kato T. D3 Lymph Node Dissection in Right Hemicolectomy with a No-touch Isolation Technique in Patients With Colon Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(7):815–24.
Kotake K, Mizuguchi T, Moritani K, Wada O, Ozawa H, Oki I, et al. Impact of D3 lymph node dissection on survival for patients with T3 and T4 colon cancer. Int J colorectal Dis. 2014;29(7):847–52.
Bertelsen CA, Kirkegaard-Klitbo A, Nielsen M, Leotta SM, Daisuke F, Gogenur I. Pattern of colon cancer Lymph node metastases in patients undergoing central mesocolic Lymph node excision: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(12):1209–21.
Lin JX, Huang CM, Zheng CH, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, et al. Is all advanced gastric cancer suitable for laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy? A case–control study using a propensity score method. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(4):1252–60. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4994-1.
Kosuga T, Ichikawa D, Okamoto K, Komatsu S, Shiozaki A, Fujiwara H, et al. Survival benefits from splenic hilar lymph node dissection by splenectomy in gastric cancer patients: relative comparison of the benefits in subgroups of patients. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(2):172–7.
Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, Ishiguro M, Miyoshi M, Kajiwara Y, et al. Potential prognostic benefit of lateral pelvic node dissection for rectal cancer located below the peritoneal reflection. Ann Surg. 2007;245(1):80–7.
Wu L, Sahara K, Tsilimigras DI, Maithel SK, Poultsides GA, Rocha FG, et al. Therapeutic index of lymphadenectomy among patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A multi-institutional analysis. Jour Surg Oncology. 2019;120(7):1080–6.
Sahara K, Tsilimigras DI, Maithel SK, Abbott DE, Poultsides GA, Hatzaras I, et al. Survival benefit of lymphadenectomy for gallbladder cancer based on the therapeutic index: An analysis of the US extrahepatic biliary malignancy consortium. J Surg Oncology. 2020;121(3):503–10.
Sahara K, Tsilimigras DI, Pawlik TM. ASO author reflections: which patients benefit the most from lymphadenectomy during resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? Ann Surg Oncology. 2019;26(9):2969–70.
Tokunaga MM, Ohyama MS, Hiki MN, Fukunaga MT, et al. Therapeutic value of lymph node dissection in advanced gastric cancer with macroscopic duodenum invasion is the posterior pancreatic head lymph node dissection beneficial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(5):1241–6. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0345-4.
Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(2):113–23.
Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Japanese classification of colorectal appendiceal, and anal carcinoma the 3d English Edition Secondary Publication. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2019;3(4):175–95.
Sasako M, McCulloch P, Kinoshita T, Maruyama K. New method to evaluate the therapeutic value of lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 1995;82(3):346–51.
Sahara K, Tsilimigras DI, Merath K, Bagante F, Guglielmi A, Aldrighetti L, et al. Therapeutic index associated with lymphadenectomy among patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: which patients benefit the most from nodal evaluation? Ann Surg Oncology. 2019;26(9):2959–68.
Watanabe T, Itabashi M, Shimada Y, Tanaka S, Ito Y, Ajioka Y, et al. Japanese society for cancer of the colon and rectum (jsccr) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncology. 2012;17(1):1–29.
Yi X, Li H, Lu X, Wan J, Diao D. "Caudal-to-cranial" plus "artery first" technique with beyond D3 lymph node dissection on the right midline of the superior mesenteric artery for the treatment of right colon cancer: is it more in line with the principle of oncology? Surg endos. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07171-5.
Huh JW, Kim YJ, Kim HR. Distribution of lymph node metastases is an independent predictor of survival for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2012;255(1):70–8.
Kim CH, Huh JW, Kim HR, Kim YJ. Prognostic comparison between number and distribution of lymph node metastases in patients with right-sided colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncology. 2014;21(4):1361–8.
Karachun A, Panaiotti L, Chernikovskiy I, Achkasov S, Gevorkyan Y, Savanovich N, et al. Short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing D2 versus D3 lymph node dissection for colonic cancer (COLD trial). BJS. 2020;107(5):499–508.
Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncology. 2010;17(6):1471–4.
Storli KE, Sondenaa K, Furnes B, Nesvik I, Gudlaugsson E, Bukholm I, et al. Short term results of complete (D3) vs standard (D2) mesenteric excision in colon cancer shows improved outcome of complete mesenteric excision in patients with TNM stages I-II. Tech coloproctol. 2014;18(6):557–64.
Funding
none.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
none.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sahara, K., Watanabe, J., Ishibe, A. et al. Optimal extent of central lymphadenectomy for right-sided colon cancers: is lymphadenectomy beyond the superior mesenteric vein meaningful?. Surg Today 51, 268–275 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02084-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-02084-6