Distal radius fractures are extremely common injuries affecting a wide range of patient demographics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of distal radius fractures managed initially with closed reduction and immobilization in either a below elbow volar–dorsal splint versus sugar-tong splint prior to conversion into a short arm cast.
We performed a retrospective study of patients with distal radius fractures placed in a sugar-tong (n = 45) and volar–dorsal splint (n = 36). Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were evaluated immediately after closed reduction and placement into either a sugar-tong or volar–dorsal splint. The radial inclination, radial length, volar tilt, and intra-articular displacement were measured.
The average age was not significantly different between groups (Diff: 1.1 years, P = 0.8766). Initial clinic follow-up radiographs illustrated significantly lower radial inclination in the sugar-tong group than volar–dorsal group (17.1 vs. 19, P = 0.0443). Follow-up mean radial length was not significantly lower in the sugar-tong than volar–dorsal group (8.4 vs. 9.2, P = 0.0858). Palmar tilt and articular step-off was not significantly different between splint types. The loss of reduction was 28.8% for the sugar-tong and 25.0% for the volar–dorsal group (P = 0.696).
Our results did not demonstrate a significant difference in loss of reduction rates between the two splint groups. There was no significant difference between the sugar-tong and volar–dorsal groups in terms of loss of radial length and volar tilt. Loss of reduction was similar between groups suggesting no advantage of a volar–dorsal splint compared to a sugar-tong splint.
Level of evidence
Therapeutic level III.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Chung KC, Spilson SV (2001) The frequency and epidemiology of hand and forearm fractures in the United States. J Hand Surg 26(5):908–915. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2001.26322
Alffram PA, Bauer GC (1962) Epidemiology of fractures of the forearm A biomechanical investigation of bone strength. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 44-A:105–114
Kopylov P, Johnell O, Redlund-Johnell I, Bengner U (1993) Fractures of the distal end of the radius in young adults: a 30-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Edinb Scotl 18(1):45–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-7681(93)90195-l
O’Neill TW, Cooper C, Finn JD et al (2001) Incidence of distal forearm fracture in British men and women. Osteoporos Int J Establ Result Coop Eur Found Osteoporos Natl Osteoporos Found USA 12(7):555–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980170076
Mackenney PJ, McQueen MM, Elton R (2006) Prediction of instability in distal radial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(9):1944–1951. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.D.02520
Clement ND, Duckworth AD, Wickramasinghe NR, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM (2017) Does socioeconomic status influence the epidemiology and outcome of distal radial fractures in adults? Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 27(8):1075–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-2003-z
Anzarut A, Johnson JA, Rowe BH, Lambert RGW, Blitz S, Majumdar SR (2004) Radiologic and patient-reported functional outcomes in an elderly cohort with conservatively treated distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg 29(6):1121–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.07.002
Beumer A, McQueen MM (2003) Fractures of the distal radius in low-demand elderly patients: closed reduction of no value in 53 of 60 wrists. Acta Orthop Scand 74(1):98–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470310013743
Jaremko JL, Lambert RGW, Rowe BH, Johnson JA, Majumdar SR (2007) Do radiographic indices of distal radius fracture reduction predict outcomes in older adults receiving conservative treatment? Clin Radiol 62(1):65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2006.08.013
Makhni EC, Ewald TJ, Kelly S, Day CS (2008) Effect of patient age on the radiographic outcomes of distal radius fractures subject to nonoperative treatment. J Hand Surg 33(8):1301–1308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.04.031
Bales JG, Stern PJ (2012) Treatment Strategies of Distal Radius Fractures. Hand Clin 28(2):177–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2012.02.003
Trumble TE, Schmitt SR, Vedder NB (1994) Factors affecting functional outcome of displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures. J Hand Surg 19(2):325–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-5023(94)90028-0
Lafontaine M, Hardy D, Delince P (1989) Stability assessment of distal radius fractures. Injury 20(4):208–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(89)90113-7
Hove LM, Solheim E, Skjeie R, Sörensen FK (1994) Prediction of secondary displacement in Colles’ fracture. J Hand Surg Edinb Scotl 19(6):731–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-7681(94)90247-x
Pool C (1973) Colles’s fracture. A prospective study of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 55(3):540–544
van der Linden W, Ericson R (1981) Colles’ fracture. How should its displacement be measured and how should it be immobilized? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 63(8):1285–1288
Moir JS, Murali SR, Ashcroft GP, Wardlaw D, Matheson AB (1995) A new functional brace for the treatment of Colles’ fractures. Injury 26(9):587–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-1383(95)00111-L
Bong MR, Egol KA, Leibman M, Koval KJ (2006) A comparison of immediate postreduction splinting constructs for controlling initial displacement of fractures of the distal radius: a prospective randomized study of long-arm versus short-arm splinting. J Hand Surg 31(5):766–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.01.016
Grafstein E, Stenstrom R, Christenson J et al (2010) A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing circumferential casting and splinting in displaced Colles fractures. CJEM 12(3):192–200. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1481803500012239
Maluta T, Cengarle M, Dib G et al (2019) SLA-VER: study protocol description and preliminar results of the first italian RCT on conservative treatment of distal radial fractures. Acta Bio-Medica Atenei Parm. 90(1-S):54–60. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i1-S.8083
Hossain M, Andrew JG (2008) Reliability of a digital radiographic system in measuring distal radial fracture displacement parameters. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 18(8):565–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-008-0354-1
Arora R, Lutz M, Deml C, Krappinger D, Haug L, Gabl M (2011) A prospective randomized trial comparing nonoperative treatment with volar locking plate fixation for displaced and unstable distal radial fractures in patients sixty-five years of age and older. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(23):2146–2153. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.01597
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2013) American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: The Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: Guideline and Evidence Report. Published March 18, 2013. Accessed July 13, 2020. https://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/distal-radius/drf_auc.pdf
Handoll HH, Madhok R (2003) Conservative interventions for treating distal radial fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2:CD000314. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000314
Young BT, Rayan GM (2000) Outcome following nonoperative treatment of displaced distal radius fractures in low-demand patients older than 60 years. J Hand Surg 25(1):19–28. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhsu.2000.jhsu025a0019
Melone CP (1993) Distal radius fractures: patterns of articular fragmentation. Orthop Clin North Am 24(2):239–253
Villar RN, Marsh D, Rushton N, Greatorex RA (1987) Three years after Colles’ fracture. A prospective review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 69(4):635–638
Jenkins NH (1989) The unstable Colles’ fracture. J Hand Surg Edinb Scotl 14(2):149–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/0266-7681(89)90116-2
This publication was supported by NIH/NCRR Colorado CTSI Grant Number UL1 RR025780. Its contents are the authors’ sole responsibility and do not necessarily represent official NIH views.
Conflict of interest
There are no conflicts of interests to disclose.
This study was approved by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board. Procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Jackson, T., Maulsby, E., Wilson, D. et al. A comparison of sugar-tong and volar–dorsal splints for provisional immobilization of distal radius fractures in the adult population. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 31, 229–234 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-020-02760-w
- Distal radius fracture
- Closed reduction
- Outcomes research