3D printing in experimental orthopaedic surgery: do it yourself
- 114 Downloads
Periprosthetic infection is considered an increasing incidence pathology whose therapeutic strategies can be defined as unsatisfactory. Currently, animal models are employed to study its physiopathology and strategic therapies, but non-species-specific materials are implanted as foreign bodies. The use of these implants implies intrinsic instability, which hinders the development of a biofilm on their surfaces and complicates the post-operative recovery of the animal. The objective of the present study is the design of a species-specific implant for the New Zealand white (NZW) rabbit by means of 3D printing.
Materials and methods
A CT scan of the knee of a NZW rabbit was performed, and the tibial surface was reconstructed in order to fabricate a species-specific tibial plateau using Horos® and Autodesk® Meshmixer™ software. This implant was inserted in fifteen NZW rabbits, and the assessment of its stability was based on the position of the limb at rest and the animal weight-bearing capacity. Biofilm formation on the surface was demonstrated by crystal violet staining.
A 1.81 cm × 1 cm × 1.24 cm stainless steel implant was designed. It consisted of a 4-mm-thick tibial plate with a rough surface and an eccentric metaphyseal anchoring. All of the animals exhibited hyperflexion of the operated limb immediately post-operative, and 100% could apply full weight bearing from day 5 after surgery.
The species-specific design of implants in experimental surgery encourages rapid recovery of the animal and the development of a biofilm on their surfaces, making them ideal for the study of the physiopathology and for establishing possible therapeutic targets for prosthetic infection.
KeywordsPeriprosthetic joint infection Animal model Implant 3D printing
Funding was provided by Santander-UCM Research Grants (PR26/16) and Mutual Medica Foundation Research Grants (2017).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.Lora-Tamayo J, Murillo O, Iribarren JA, Soriano A, Sanchez-Somolinos M, Baraia-Etxaburu JM, Rico A, Palomino J, Rodriguez-Pardo D, Horcajada JP, Benito N, Bahamonde A, Granados A, del Toro MD, Cobo J, Riera M, Ramos A, Jover-Saenz A, Ariza J, Infection RGftSoP (2013) A large multicenter study of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infections managed with implant retention. Clin Infect Dis 56:182–194. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis746 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Arnal-Burro J, Perez-Mananes R, Gallo-Del-Valle E, Igualada-Blazquez C, Cuervas-Mons M, Vaquero-Martin J (2017) Three dimensional-printed patient-specific cutting guides for femoral varization osteotomy: do it yourself. Knee 24:1359–1368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2017.04.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Frame M, Leach W (2014) DIY 3D printing of custom orthopaedic implants: a proof of concept study. Surg Technol Int 24:314–317Google Scholar
- 20.Belmatoug N, Cremieux AC, Bleton R, Volk A, Saleh-Mghir A, Grossin M, Garry L, Carbon C (1996) A new model of experimental prosthetic joint infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a microbiologic, histopathologic, and magnetic resonance imaging characterization. J Infect Dis 174:414–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Carli AV, Bhimani S, Yang X, Shirley MB, de Mesy Bentley KL, Ross FP, Bostrom MP (2017) Quantification of peri-implant bacterial load and in vivo biofilm formation in an innovative, clinically representative mouse model of periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:e25. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00815 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Cordero J, Munuera L, Folgueira MD (1996) The influence of the chemical composition and surface of the implant on infection. Injury 27(Suppl 3):SC34–SC37Google Scholar
- 27.Poultsides LA, Papatheodorou LK, Karachalios TS, Khaldi L, Maniatis A, Petinaki E, Malizos KN (2008) Novel model for studying hematogenous infection in an experimental setting of implant-related infection by a community-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus strain. J Orthop Res 26:1355–1362. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20608 CrossRefGoogle Scholar