Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of osteoarthritis secondary to acetabular fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation

  • Original Article • HIP - ARTHROPLASTY
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Acetabular fractures are associated with damage to the femoral head, acetabular cartilage and labrum and possible disruption of the femoral head blood supply. Treatment aims to provide the best opportunity for restoration of joint function and to prevent long-term complications. Surgical intervention, in the form of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), is often required. Where post-traumatic osteoarthritis develops after ORIF, total hip arthroplasty (THA) is often required. Our aim here has been to identify and highlight our experience with the key technical points associated with successful outcomes for THA in this setting.

Methods

A single-centre retrospective review of patients with acetabular fractures treated with ORIF and subsequent THA over a 4-year period was undertaken. Demographics, mechanism of injury, complications, interval time between surgeries, intra-operative outcomes and post-operative outcomes were recorded. Particular emphasis is made to describe standard pre-operative and intra-operative protocols.

Results

Twenty-five patients were identified, with a mean age of 51.1 years at time of first ORIF. 60% presented following RTA. 80% of fractures involved the posterior wall or column. Meantime to eventual THA was 2.3 years. Mean THA duration was 1.52 h, with mean intra-operative blood loss and length of stay of 585 ml and 5 days, respectively. 24% required intra-operative removal of metal, with only one patient suffering a complication post-THA.

Conclusion

Acceptable post-operative outcomes were demonstrated throughout the case series. In describing the pre-operative work up, intra-operative findings and intra-operative and post-operative complications encountered, common important technical points associated with a successful surgical strategy are described. Furthermore, potential pitfalls that may be encountered can be anticipated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meena UK, Tripathy SK, Sen RK, Aggarwal S, Behera P (2013) Predictors of postoperative outcome for acetabular fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99(8):929–935

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Matta JM (1996) Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(11):1632–1645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Briffa N, Pearce R, Hill AM, Bircher M (2011) Outcomes of acetabular fracture fixation with ten years’ follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(2):229–236

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pennal GF, Davidson J, Garside H, Plewes J (1980) Results of treatment of acetabular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 151:115–123

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dailey SK, Phillips CT, Radley JM, Archdeacon MT (2016) Achieving anatomic acetabular fracture reduction-when is the best time to operate? J Orthop Trauma 30(8):426–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tannast M, Najibi S, Matta JM (2012) Two to twenty-year survivorship of the hip in 810 patients with operatively treated acetabular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(17):1559–1567

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schnaser E, Scarcella NR, Vallier HA (2014) Acetabular fractures converted to total hip arthroplasties in the elderly: how does function compare to primary total hip arthroplasty? J Orthop Trauma 28(12):694–699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Makridis KG, Obakponovwe O, Bobak P, Giannoudis PV (2014) Total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fracture: incidence of complications, reoperation rates and functional outcomes: evidence today. J Arthroplasty 29(10):1983–1990

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. von Roth P, Abdel MP, Harmsen WS, Berry DJ (2015) Total hip arthroplasty after operatively treated acetabular fracture: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(4):288–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang L, Zhou Y, Li Y, Xu H, Guo X, Zhou Y (2011) Total hip arthroplasty for failed treatment of acetabular fractures: a 5-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 26(8):1189–1193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Morison Z, Moojen DJF, Nauth A, Hall J, McKee MD, Waddell JP et al (2016) Total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fracture is associated with lower survivorship and more complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(2):392–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bellabarba C, Berger RA, Bentley CD, Quigley LR, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG et al (2001) Cementless acetabular reconstruction after acetabular fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(6):868–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yuan BJ, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD (2015) Porous metal acetabular components have a low rate of mechanical failure in THA after operatively treated acetabular fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(2):536–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lai O, Yang J, Shen B, Zhou Z, Kang P, Pei F (2011) Midterm results of uncemented acetabular reconstruction for posttraumatic arthritis secondary to acetabular fracture. J Arthroplasty 26(7):1008–1013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sierra RJ, Mabry TM, Sems SA, Berry DJ (2013) Acetabular fractures: the role of total hip replacement. Bone Joint J 95-B(11 Suppl A):11–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jouffroy P, Bone and Joint Trauma Study Group (GETRAUM) (2014) Indications and technical challenges of total hip arthroplasty in the elderly after acetabular fracture. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100(2):193–197

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hirst P, Esser M, Murphy JC, Hardinge K (1987) Bone grafting for protrusio acetabuli during total hip replacement. A review of the Wrightington method in 61 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69(2):229–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Deirmengian GK, Zmistowski B, O’Neil JT, Hozack WJ (2011) Management of acetabular bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(19):1842–1852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Judet R, Judet J, Letournel E (1964) Fractures of the acetabulum: classification and surgical approaches for open reduction. preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 46:1615–1646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mehlman CT, Meiss L, DiPasquale TG (2000) Hyphenated-history: the Kocher-Langenbeck surgical approach. J Orthop Trauma 14:60

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Letournel E (1993) The treatment of acetabular fractures through the ilioinguinal approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 292:62–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Peter Dawson, Lisa Dunne, Hasnain Raza, Mark Quin and Michael Leonard declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Dawson.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dawson, P., Dunne, L., Raza, H. et al. Total hip arthroplasty for the treatment of osteoarthritis secondary to acetabular fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29, 1049–1054 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02406-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02406-6

Keywords

Navigation