Intra- and inter-observer reliability of Laredo classification system in Legg–Calvé–Perthes Disease
- 51 Downloads
The purpose of the current study was to investigate intra- and inter-observer reliability of arthrographic Laredo classification system in Perthes disease. Forty-seven patients were included in this cross-sectional descriptive study. Patients’ age, gender, physical findings and hip arthrographs were collected from hospital medical records. Two different sets of power point slides were prepared in which the order of cases was randomized and blinded. Observers were divided into three groups according to their surgical experience (9 residents, 10 seniors, 10 pediatric orthopedists), and they assessed two times 1 month’s intervals. Statistical analysis was performed by using the SPSS v21. Inter- and intra-observer reliabilities were calculated using intra-class correlation coefficient, weighted kappa and percentage agreement. Percentage agreement of Laredo classification was about 50% for all groups (residents, seniors and pediatric orthopedists); intra-observer reliabilities were excellent, excellent and fair, respectively. Inter-observer reliability of Laredo classification for each set was found to be excellent for all groups. Length of experience did not correlated significantly with the level of intra-observer agreement. As a conclusion, our results showed that Laredo’s arthrographic classification system’s intra-observer reliability is at least at a fair level and inter-observer reliability is at an excellent level. We believe that this classification system is valuable for an orthopedic surgeon who deals with the treatment of Perthes disease.
KeywordsArthrography Reliability Laredo classification Perthes Children
We thank Asuman Filiz Guzelant for her contribution.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 3.Mose K (1980) Methods of measuring in Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease with special regard to the prognosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 150:103–109Google Scholar
- 6.Chaudhry S, Phillips D, Feldman D (2014) Legg–Calvé–Perthes Disease: an overview with recent literature. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 72(1):18–27Google Scholar
- 7.de Sanctis N, Rondinella F (2000) Prognostic evaluation of Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease by MRI. Part II: pathomorphogenesis and new classification. J Pediatr Orthop 20(4):463–470Google Scholar
- 14.Laredo FJ (1992) Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease: arthrographic classification. Rev Bras Orthop 27:7–10Google Scholar
- 16.Agus H, Kalenderer O, Eryanılmaz G, Ozcalabi IT (2004) Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of Catterall, Herring, Salter–Thompson and Stulberg classification systems in Perthes disease. J Pediatr Orthop 13:166–169Google Scholar
- 19.Mahadeva D, Chong M, Langton DJ, Turner AM (2010) Reliability and reproducibility of classification systems for Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease: a systematic review of the literature. Acta Orthop Belg 76:48–57Google Scholar
- 21.Ritterbusch JF, Shantaram SS, Gelinas C (1993) Comparison of lateral pillar classification and Catterall classification of Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease. J Pediatr Orthop 13:200–202Google Scholar
- 22.Fleiss JL (1986) Reliability of measurement. In: Fleiss JL (ed) The design and analysis of clinical experiments. Wiley, New York, pp 1–32Google Scholar
- 25.Altman DB (1999) Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 27.Karanicolas PJ, Bhandari M, Kreder H, Moroni A, Richardson M, Walter SD, Norman GR, Guyatt GH, Collaboration for Outcome Assessment in Surgical Trials (COAST) Musculoskeletal Group (2009) Evaluating agreement: conducting a reliability study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl 3):99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Milani C, Dobashi ET (2011) Arthrogram in Legg–Calvé–Perthes disease. J Pediatr Orthop 31(Suppl 2):56–62Google Scholar