Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of patient position on coronal Cobb angle measurement in non-ambulatory myelodysplastic patients

  • Original Article • SPINE - IMAGING
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of patient position on the magnitude of the coronal Cobb angle measurements in relation to the change of position using plain radiograph on non-ambulatory children with myelodysplasia.

Summary of background data

Whole-spine radiographs with the patient sitting generally are preferred for the diagnosis and monitoring of progression of scoliosis in neuromuscular patients. Supine, supine traction, and sitting push-up positions have been used as substitutes, although there is no general consensus validating if these positions correlate with the sitting position. The magnitude of the Cobb angles in neuromuscular scoliosis may vary greatly depending on the position of the patient.

Methods

Radiographs of 39 myelodysplastic, non-ambulatory children were evaluated to assess the impact of change in positions (unsupported sitting, sitting push-up, supine, and supine traction) on coronal Cobb angle measurement using plain whole-spine radiographs.

Results

The mean difference in thoracic Cobb angle measurements between sitting and all other positions ranged from 6° to 12°. At the lumbar level, the Cobb angles ranged from 12° to 16°.

Conclusions

Statistically significant differences in the Cobb angle measurements were identified between plain radiographs of the whole spine with the patient in the unsupported sitting position compared to sitting push-up, supine, and supine traction positions. The data support that the magnitude of the Cobb angles in neuromuscular scoliosis varies greatly depending on the position of the patient.

Level of evidence

III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Halawi M, Lark R, Fitch R (2015) Neuromuscular scoliosis: current concepts. Orthopedics 38:e452–e456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cobb JR (1948) Outline for the study of scoliosis. In: Edwards JW (ed) Instructional course lectures. The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeon, Ann Arbor, pp 261–275

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta M, Wijesekera S, Sossan A et al (2007) Reliability of radiographic parameters in neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine 32:691–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brink RC, Colo D, Schlösser TPC et al (2017) Upright, prone, and supine spinal morphology and alignment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis Spinal Disord 12:6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Keenan BE, Izatt MT, Askin GN et al (2014) Supine to standing Cobb angle change in idiopathic scoliosis: the effect of endplate pre-selection. Scoliosis 9:16

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Vavruch L, Tropp H (2016) A comparison of Cobb angle: standing versus supine images of late-onset idiopathic scoliosis. Polish J Radiol 81:270–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Torell G, Nachemson A, Haderspeck-Grib K et al (1985) Standing and supine Cobb measures in girls with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 10:425–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee MC, Solomito M, Patel A (2013) Supine magnetic resonance imaging Cobb measurements for idiopathic scoliosis are linearly related to measurements from standing plain radiographs. Spine 38:E656–E661

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wessberg P, Danielson BI, Willen J (2006) Comparison of Cobb angles in idiopathic scoliosis on standing radiographs and supine axially loaded MRI. Spine 31:3039–3044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Trivedi J, Thomson JD, Slakey JB et al (2002) Clinical and radiographic predictors of scoliosis in patients with myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84(8):1389–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Canfield MA, Mai CT, Wang P, O’Halloran A, Marengo LK, Olney RS et al (2014) The association between race/ethnicity and major birth defects in the United States, 1999–2007. Am J Public Health 104:e1–e10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Children’s Spine Foundation for the grant awarded to perform the study. We also give recognition to John M Flynn MD (deceased) who gave the initial support.

Funding

Funding was provided by Children Spine Foundation Grant #18.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norman Ramirez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

IRB approval: Hospital De La Concepcion, Research Ethics Committee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramirez, N., Padilla, J., Villarin, S. et al. Impact of patient position on coronal Cobb angle measurement in non-ambulatory myelodysplastic patients. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 29, 25–29 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2264-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2264-1

Keywords

Navigation