Comparison between locked and unlocked intramedullary nails in intertrochanteric fractures
- 175 Downloads
Intertrochanteric fractures are of great interest worldwide and are the most frequently operated fractures. Intramedullary nailing is commonly used in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. The purpose of this study is to assess the necessity of using the distal blocking screw in 31-A1 and 31-A2 fractures, classified according to the Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification system (AO/OTA).
This is a prospective study of 143 consecutive patients (mean age 85.01 years, mean final follow-up 14.1 months) surgically treated with the same intramedullary nail. In 75 cases, the distal locking screw was not used. Parameters evaluated during follow-up were: blood loss, transfusion requirements, surgery duration, and fluoroscopy time. Harris Hip Score and Barthel Activity Daily Living were used for the clinical evaluation. Radiographic Union Score For Hip (RUSH score) and Tip apex distance (TAD) were measured for radiologic evaluation.
The group treated without locking screw showed significantly shorter surgical duration time (31.9 vs. 47.2 min), a decrease in blood loss (variation Hb − 1.06 vs. − 1.97), and reduced X-rays exposure time (25.4 vs. 31.6 s). No significant differences were observed in the postoperative period and in the radiographic and clinical scores.
This study demonstrates that in intertrochanteric 31-A1 and 31-A2 stable fractures, the absence of distal locking screw does not compromise bone healing and prevents several clinical complications.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 11.Chiavaras MM, Bains S, Choudur H et al (2013) The Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH): the use of a checklist to evaluate hip fracture healing improves agreement between radiologists and orthopedic surgeons. Skelet Radiol 42(8):1079–1088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1605-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Court-Brown CM, Heckman JD, McQueen M, Ricci W, Tornetta P III, McKee M (2014) Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults, VIII edn. Wolters Kluwer, RiverwoodsGoogle Scholar
- 13.Ma J, Xing D, Ma X et al (2012) The percutaneous compression plate versus the dynamic hip screw for treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(7):773–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2012.07.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Varela-Egocheaga JR, Iglesias-Colao R, Suárez-Suárez MA et al (2009) Minimally invasive osteosynthesis in stable trochanteric fractures: a comparative study between Gotfried percutaneous compression plate and Gamma 3 intramedullary nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(10):1401–1407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0955-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Barry TP (1984) Radiation exposure to an orthopedic surgeon. Clin Orthop Relat Res 182:160–164Google Scholar