Anatomical considerations of C2 lamina for the placement of translaminar screw: a review of the literature
- 108 Downloads
The thorough knowledge of C2 lamina anatomy is essential for the avoidance of complications during screw fixation. We performed a review of the literature, aiming to detect what was found about anatomical feasibility of C2 translaminar fixation in different populations, along with possible recommendations for the avoidance of complications, and to detect whether factors such as race or gender could influence axis lamina anatomy and fixation feasibility.
We performed a search in PubMed and Cochrane database of systematic reviews for studies which correlated axis lamina anatomy with fixation feasibility. We extracted data concerning measurements on C2 lamina, the methods and conclusions of the studies.
Twenty-six studies met our inclusion criteria. The studies mainly focused on Asian populations. Male gender was generally related to larger anatomical parameters of C2 lamina. The use of a C2 translaminar screw with a diameter of 3.5 mm was generally feasible, even in children, but there was disagreement about risk of vertebral artery injury. Computed tomography was most frequently recommended preoperatively. Three-dimensional reconstruction was suggested by some authors.
C2 lamina anatomy generally permitted screw fixation in most studies, but there was disagreement about risk of vertebral artery injury. Preoperative computed tomography was generally recommended, while, according to some authors, three-dimensional reconstruction could be essential. However, there is a relative lack of studies about non-Asian populations. More research could further illustrate the anatomy of C2 lamina, clarify the safety of axis fixation for more populations and perhaps modify preoperative imaging protocols.
KeywordsC2 Lamina Anatomy Screw
Complience with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 5.Wright NM, Lauryssen C (1998) Vertebral artery injury in C1–2 transarticular screw fixation: results of a survey of the AANS/CNS section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves. American Association of neurological surgeons/congress of neurological surgeons. J Neurosurg 88:634–640. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.88.4.0634 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Xia DD, Lin SL, Chen W, Shen ZH, Li Y, Wang XY, Xu HZ, Chi YL (2014) Computed tomography morphometric analysis of C2 translaminar screw fixation of Wright’s technique and a modified technique in the pediatric cervical spine. Eur Spine J. 23(3):606–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3130-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Hu Y, He XF, Gu YJ, Xu RM, Ma WH, Ruan YP, Lin R (2010) Feasibility study on posterior laminar screw fixation techniques in the axis. Chin J Traumatol. 13(2):77–82. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-1275.2010.02.003 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Kim YJ, Rhee WT, Lee SB, You SH, Lee SY (2008) Computerized tomographic measurements of morphometric parameters of the c2 for the feasibility of laminar screw fixation in korean population. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 44(1):15–18. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2008.44.1.15 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Sharma RM, Pruthi N, Pandey P, Dawn R, Ravindranath Y, Ravindranath R (2015) Morphometric and radiological assessments of dimensions of Axis in dry vertebrae: a study in Indian population. Indian J Orthop 49(6):583–588. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.168758 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.Wang MY (2006) C2 crossing laminar screws: cadaveric morphometric analysis. Neurosurgery 59(1 Suppl 1):ONS84–ONS88. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000219900.24467.32 PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Riesenburger RI, Jones GA, Roguski M, Krishnaney AA (2013) Risk to the vertebral artery during C-2 translaminar screw placement: a thin-cut computerized tomography angiogram-based morphometric analysis: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine. 19(2):217–221. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.5.SPINE12790 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Nakanishi K, Tanaka M, Sugimoto Y, Misawa H, Takigawa T, Fujiwara K et al (2008) Application of laminar screws to posterior fusion of cervical spine: measurement of the cervical vertebral arch diameter with a navigation system. Spine 33:620–623. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318166aa76 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Cassinelli EH, Lee M, Skalak A, Ahn NU, Wright NM (2006) Anatomic considerations for the placement of C2 laminar screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(24):2767–2771. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000245869.85276.f4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Lee H, Hong JT, Kim IS, Kim MS, Sung JH, Lee SW (2014) Anatomic feasibility of posterior cervical pedicle screw placement in children: computerized tomographic analysis of children under 10 years old. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 56(6):475–481. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2014.56.6.475 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 32.Cristante AF, Torelli AG, Kohlmann RB, Dias da Rocha I, Biraghi OL, Iutaka AS, Marcon RM, Oliveira RP, de Barros Pessoa, Filho TE (2012) Feasibility of intralaminar, lateral mass, or pedicle axis vertebra screws in children under 10 years of age: a tomographic study. Neurosurgery. 70(4):835–838. https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182367417 discussion 838-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Chern JJ, Chamoun RB, Whitehead WE, Curry DJ, Luerssen TG, Jea A (2009) Computed tomography morphometric analysis for axial and subaxial translaminar screw placement in the pediatric cervical spine. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 3(2):121–128. https://doi.org/10.3171/2008.11.PEDS08277 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Combalia Andrés (2013) Anatomy. In: Korres (ed) The Àxis Vertebra`, Chap 2, Springer, Italy, pp 7–19Google Scholar
- 36.Kokkinis K, Emmanouil Em (2013) Imaging. In: Korres (ed) The Àxis Vertebra`, Chap 4. Springer, Italy, pp 27–38Google Scholar
- 37.White ML (2000) Cervical spine. MR imaging, techniques and anatomy. MRI Clin North Am 8:453–469Google Scholar