Cementless modular neck stems: are they a safe option in primary total hip arthroplasty?

  • José M. Pelayo-de-Tomás
  • José L. Rodrigo-Pérez
  • Carlos D. Novoa-Parra
  • Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla
  • María Morales-Suárez-Varela
  • José Antonio Blas-Dobón
Original Article • HIP - ARTHROPLASTY
  • 228 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The objective was to assess aseptic complications and functional outcome using a primary total hip arthroplasty with modular neck.

Methods

Prospective cohort of 317 consecutive patients. The mean age was 61.1 (range, 41–84) years. The H-Max-M model (Lima, Italy) system was used in all patients. The functional assessment was made by the Harris Hip Score, Short Form-36 (SF-36), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and visual analogue scale for pain. Radiological outcomes were also assessed, and adverse events and complications were noted.

Results

The mean follow-up was 6.1 (range, 2–8) years. Functional outcome significantly improved in most patients. There were 3 deep infections (0.9%) and 17 aseptic complications (5.3%) including 1 intraoperative acetabular fracture, 3 later periprosthetic femoral fractures, 1 broken ceramic insert, 1 acetabular loosening, 3 femoral loosening and 1 broken titanium modular neck in a obese patient. No pseudotumors or elevated serum levels of metal ions were found among the patients with radiolucent lines or aseptic loosening.

Conclusions

The findings in the present study showed that the H-MAX-M stem provided satisfactory functional outcome in most patients with a low rate of complications attributable to the modular neck design. We consider that using this novel modular neck-stem coupling design can be an alternative to the conventional monoblock stems in patients without overweight.

Keywords

Total hip arthroplasty Modular neck H-MAX M hip system Functional outcome Pseudotumor Serum metal ion level 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 370:1508–1519. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Traina F, De Fine M, Biondi F, Tassinari E, Galvani A, Toni A (2009) The influence of the centre of rotation on implant survival using a modular stem hip prosthesis. Int Orthop 33:1513–1518. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0710-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Duwelius PJ, Hartzband MA, Burkhart R, Carnahan C, Blair S, Wu Y, Grunkemeier GL (2010) Clinical results of a modular neck hip system: hitting the “bull’s-eye” more accurately. Am J Orthop 39(suppl 10):2–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duwelius PJ, Burkhart B, Carnahan C, Branam G, Ko LM, Wu Y, Froemke C, Wang L, Grunkemeier G (2014) Modular versus nonmodular neck femoral implants in primary total hip artroplasty: which is better? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:1240–1245. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3361-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fitch DA, Ancarani C, Bordini B (2015) Long-term survivorship and complication rate comparison of a cementless modular stem and cementless fixed neck stems for primary total hip replacement. Int Orthop 39:1827–1832. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2894-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (2013) Annual Report. https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2013. Accessed 15 May 2017
  7. 7.
    Krishnan H, Krishnan SP, Blunn G, Skinner JA, Hart AJ (2013) Modular neck femoral stems. Bone Jt J 95:1011–1021. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B8.31525 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ghanem E, Ward DM, Robbins CE, Nandi S, Bono JV, Talmo CT (2015) Corrosion and adverse local tissue reaction in one type of modular neck stem. J Arthroplasty 30:1787–1793. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.039 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grupp TM, Weik T, Bloemer W, Knaebel HP (2010) Modular titanium alloy neck adapter failures in hip replacement-failure mode analysis and influence of implant material. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fokter SK, Moličnik A, Kavalar R, Pelicon P, Rudolf R, Gubeljak N (2017) Why do some titanium-alloy total hip arthroplasty modular necks fail? J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 69:107–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.12.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cooper HJ, Urban RM, Wixson RL, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ (2013) Adverse local tissue reaction arising from corrosion at the femoral neck-body junction in a dual-taper stem with a cobalt—chromium modular neck. J Bone Jt Surg Am 95A:865–872. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kwon YM, Fehring TK, Lombardi AV, Barnes L, Cabanela ME, Jacobs JJ (2014) Risk stratification algorithm for management of patients with dual modular taper total hip arthroplasty: consensus statement of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the Hip Society. J Arthroplasty 29:2060–2064. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.07.029 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mencière ML, Amouyel T, Taviaux J, Bayle M, Laterza C, Mertl P (2014) Fracture of the cobalt-chromium modular femoral neck component in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 100:565–568. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.03.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fokter SK, Levašič V, Kovač S (2017) The innovation trap: modular neck in total hip arthroplasty. Zdrav Vestn 86:115–126Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pivec R, Meneghini RM, Hozack WJ, Westrich GH, Mont MA (2014) Modular taper junction corrosión and failure: how to approach a recalled total hip arthroplasty implant. J Arthroplasty 29:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.08.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meftah M, Haleem AM, Burn MB, Smith KM, Incavo SJ (2014) Early corrosion-related failure of the Rejuvenate modular total hip replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96A:481–487. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00979 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    De Martino I, Assini JB, Elpers ME, Wright TM, Westrich GH (2015) Corrosion and fretting of a modular hip system: a retrieval analysis of 60 Rejuvenate stems. J Arthroplasty 30:1470–1475. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Restrepo C, Ross D, Restrepo S, Heller S, Goyal N, Moore R, Hozack WJ (2014) Adverse clinical outcomes in a primary modular neck/stem system. J Arthroplasty 29(Suppl 9):173–178. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.040 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barlow BT, Assini J, Boles J, Lee YY, Westrich GH (2015) Short-term metal ion trends following removal of recalled modular neck femoral stems. J Arthroplasty 30:1191–1196. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.033 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Molloy DO, Munir S, Jack CM, Cross MB, Walter WL, Walter WK Sr (2014) Fretting and corrosion in modular-neck total hip arthroplasty femoral stems. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96A:488–493. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01625 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Antonietti B, Paderni S, Sama D, Comitini V, Sudanese A (2003) Anatomic cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic bearings and modular necks: 3 to 5 years follow-up. Chir Organi Mov 88:259–265PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Benazzo F, Rossi SM, Cecconi D, Piovani L, Ravasi F (2010) Mid-term results of an uncemented femoral stem with modular neck options. Hip Int 20(4):427–433CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dagnino A, Grappiolo G, Benazzo FM, Learmonth ID, Portinaro N, Spotorno L (2012) Medium-term outcome in patients treated with total hip arthroplasty using a modular femoral stem. Hip Int 22:274–279. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2012.9245 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pour AE, Borden R, Murayama T, Groll-Brown M, Blaha JD (2016) High risk of failure with bimodular femoral components in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474:146–153. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4542-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fokter SK, Rudolf R, Molicnik A (2016) Titanium alloy femoral neck fracture-clinical and metallurgical analysis in 6 cases. Acta Orthop 87:197–202. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2015.1047289 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Harris WH (1969) Traumatic artrhritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 51A:737–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Med Care 30:473–483CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bellamy N, Buchanan W, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and the knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    DeLee JS, Charnley J (1976) Radiologic demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Della Valle AG, Zoppi A, Peterson MG, Salvati EA (2004) Clinical and radiographic results associated with a modern, cementless modular cup design in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 86A(9):1998–2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gruen TA, McNiece GM, Amstutz HC (1979) Modes of failures of cemented stem-type femoral component: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17–27Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH (1987) Porous-coated hip replacement: the factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Jt Surg Br 69(1):45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Buente D, Huber G, Bishop N, Morlock M (2015) Quantification of material loss from the neck piece taper junctions of a bimodular primary hip prosthesis: a retrieval study from 27 failed Rejuvenate bimodular hip arthroplasties. Bone Jt J 97:1350–1357. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B10.35342 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bernstein DT, Meftah M, Paranilam J, Incavo SJ (2016) Eighty-six percent failure rate of a modular-neck femoral stem design at 3 to 5 years: lessons learned. J Bone Jt Surg Am 98:e49. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01082 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kretzer JP, Jakubowitz E, Krachler M, Thomsen M, Heisel C (2009) Metal release and corrosion effects of modular neck total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 33:1531–1536. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0729-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gill IP, Webb J, Sloan K, Beaver RJ (2012) Corrosion at the neck–stem junction as a cause of metal ion release and pseudotumour formation. J Bone Jt Surg Br 94B:895–900. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B7.29122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Carothers JT, Archibeck MJ, Tripuraneni KR (2015) Modular versus nonmodular femoral necks for primary total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 44:411–414PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ollivier M, Parratte S, Galland A, Lunebourg A, Flecher X, Argenson JN (2015) Titanium-titanium modular neck for primary THA: result of a prospective series of 170 cemented THA with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101:137–142. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.12.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jauch SY, Huber G, Hoenig E, Baxmann M, Grupp TM, Morlock MM (2011) Influence of material coupling and assembly condition on the magnitude of micromotion at the stem-neck interface of a modular hip endoprosthesis. J Biomech 44:1747–1751. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.04.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Skendzel JG, Blaha JD, Urquhart AG (2011) Total hip arthroplasty modular neck failure. J Arthroplasty 26:338-e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.03.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France SAS 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • José M. Pelayo-de-Tomás
    • 1
  • José L. Rodrigo-Pérez
    • 1
  • Carlos D. Novoa-Parra
    • 1
  • Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla
    • 2
  • María Morales-Suárez-Varela
    • 3
    • 4
  • José Antonio Blas-Dobón
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryDoctor Peset University HospitalValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Faculty of MedicineMiguel Hernandez UniversityElcheSpain
  3. 3.Unit of Public Health and Environmental Care, Department of Preventive MedicineUniversity of ValenciaValenciaSpain
  4. 4.CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations