Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Second opinion in spine surgery: a Brazilian perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors present their experience in a programme for second opinion evaluation of spine surgery candidates within a cohort of patients from a healthcare provider in Brazil. Ninety-four patients were evaluated, and the second opinion was divided in complete agreement, partial disagreement, and complete disagreement. Patients with complete disagreement were referred for a third medical opinion. A complete agreement was found in 22 cases, partial disagreement in 28 cases, and complete disagreement in 44 cases. The majority of the discrepancies between first and second opinion were found in lumbar degenerative disorders, with a reduction of 50 % in the amount of surgical procedures and a 50 % reduction in the rate of instrumentation within this subset of patients. Within 1 year of the index evaluation, only two patients who followed the proposed treatment guidelines were reoperated, giving an estimate of the adequacy of this second opinion programme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deyo RA, Mirza SK (2014) The case for restraint in spinal surgery: does quality management have a role to play? Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 3):331–337

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ausman J (2014) The death of spine surgery, sequel-2014. Surg Neurol Int 5:169

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis H (1994) Increasing rates of cervical and lumbar spine surgery in the United States, 1979–1990. Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976) 19:1117–1123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitzsimmons D, Phillips C, Bennett H et al (2014) Cost-effectiveness of different strategies to manage patients with sciatica. Pain 155:1318–1327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McGuire SM, Phillips KT, Weinstein JN (1994) Factors that affect surgical rates in Iowa. Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976) 19:2038–2040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nilasena DS, Vaughn RJ, Mori M, Lyon JL (1995) Surgical trends in the treatment of diseases of the lumbar spine in Utah’s Medicare population, 1984 to 1990. Med Care 33:585–597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mulholland RC, Sengupta DK (2002) Rationale, principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S198–S205

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zigler JE, Burd TA, Vialle EN et al (2003) Lumbar spine arthroplasty: early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthro-plasty versus fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):352–361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Freeman BJC, Davenport J (2006) Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 3):439–447

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Deyo RA, Ching A, Matsen L et al (2012) Use of bone morphogenetic proteins in spinal fusion surgery for older adults with lumbar stenosis: trends, complications, repeat surgery, and charges. Spine 37(3):222–230

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Walcott BP, Hanak BW, Caracci JR et al (2011) Trends in inpatient setting laminectomy for excision of herniated intervertebral disc: population-based estimates from the US nationwide inpatient sample. Surg Neurol Int 2:7

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fox J, Haig AJ, Todey B, Challa S (2013) The effect of required physiatrist consultation on surgery rates for back pain. Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976) 38:E178–E184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fritz JM, Childs JD, Wainner RS, Flynn TW (2012) Primary care referral of patients with low back pain to physical therapy: impact on future health care utilization and costs. Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976) 37:2114–2121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Busse JW, Riva J, Rampersaud R et al (2013) Surgeon attitudes toward nonphysician screening of low back or low back-related leg pain patients referred for surgical assessment: a survey of Canadian spine surgeons. Spine (Phila. Pa. 1976) 38:E402–E408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Epstein NE, Hood DC (2011) ‘Unnecessary’ spinal surgery: a prospective 1-year study of one surgeon’s experience. Surg Neurol Int 2:83

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Epstein NE (2013) Are recommended spine operations either unnecessary or too complex? Evidence from second opinions. Surg Neurol Int 4:S353–S358

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vialle LR, Vialle E (2006) Doença degenerativa discal lombar. In: Mercadante M (ed) Alves Junior WM. Programa de Atualização em Traumatologia e Ortopedia. Artmed/Panamericana, Porto Alegre, pp 129–164

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vialle LR, Vialle E, Henao JE, Giraldo G (2010) Hérnia Discal Lombar. Rev Bras Ortop 45:17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vialle E, Vialle LR (2014) Estenose do canal lombar. In: Martins DE, Puertas EB, Wajchenberg M (eds) Clínica da Coluna Vertebral. Atheneu, São Paulo, pp 93–104

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vialle E, Vialle LR (2014) Mielopatia espondilótica cervical. In: Martins DE, Puertas EB, Wajchenberg M (eds) Clínica da Coluna Vertebral. Atheneu, São Paulo, pp 105–112

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gamache FW (2012) The value of ‘another’ opinion for spinal surgery: a prospective 14-month study of one surgeon’s experience. Surg Neurol Int 3:S350–S354

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Spine Surgery Group, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Cajuru University Hospital, Catholic University of Parana, Rua Brigadeiro Franco 979, Curitiba, 80430-210, Brazil

    Emiliano Vialle

Authors
  1. Emiliano Vialle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emiliano Vialle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vialle, E. Second opinion in spine surgery: a Brazilian perspective. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25 (Suppl 1), 3–6 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1640-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-015-1640-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation