A preliminary study of 3.0-T magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging in cervical spondylotic myelopathy
To compare diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters of the spinal cord between patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and normal subjects, and investigate their significance in the clinical diagnosis, surgical planning and post-operative evaluation of CSM.
Routine sequence magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and DTI scans were performed in 50 normal subjects and 60 cases of CSM with 3.0-T MR. DTI images, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) colormaps corresponding to spinal cord cross-sections were obtained. The spinal cord function of CSM patients was measured using modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) scoring and Nurick grade at different times. The changes in DTI parameters and their correlation with spinal cord function scores were analysed by SPSS 19.
There were significant differences in DTI parameters of the spinal cord between normal subjects and patients with CSM (ADC: 1.119 ± 0.087 vs. 1.395 ± 0.091, P < 0.01; FA: 0.661 ± 0.057 vs. 0.420 ± 0.080, P < 0.01). The FA values at the maximal compression level of the spinal cord in the patients with CSM were significantly associated with the mJOA score pre-operatively, 1 week, and 1, 3 and 6 months post-operatively, with Pearson’s correlation coefficients of 0.58 (P < 0.01), 0.53 (P < 0.05), and 0.51 (P < 0.05), 0.54 (P < 0.05) and 0.55 (P < 0.05), respectively. However, the FA values were significantly negatively associated with the Nurick grade, with Pearson’s correlation coefficients of − 0.40 (P < 0.05), − 0.39 (P < 0.05), and -0.41 (P < 0.05), − 0.45 (P < 0.05) and − 0.44 (P < 0.05), respectively.
DTI may play a significant role in diagnosing and predicting the development of CSM.
KeywordsCervical spondylotic myelopathy Spinal cord Magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion tensor imaging Spinal cord function scores
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 9.Tetreault LA, Dettori JR, Wilson JR, Singh A, Nouri A, Fehlings MG, Brodt ED, Jacobs WB (2013) Systematic review of magnetic resonance imaging characteristics that affect treatment decision making and predict clinical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(22 Suppl 1):S89–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Liu Y, Kong C, Cui L, Yuan X, Zhao P, Zhang Y, Guan Y, Chen X (2017) Correlation between diffusion tensor imaging parameters and clinical assessments in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy with and without high signal intensity. Spinal Cord 55(9):1079–1083Google Scholar
- 14.Bartels RH, Verbeek AL, Benzel EC, Fehlings MG, Guiot BH (2010) Validation of a translated version of the modified Japanese orthopaedic association score to assess outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an approach to globalize outcomes assessment tools. Neurosurgery 66(5):1013–1016CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Kelley BJ, Harel NY, Kim CY, Papademetris X, Coman D, Wang X, Hasan O, Kaufman A, Globinsky R, Staib LH, Cafferty WB, Hyder F, Strittmatter SM (2014) Diffusion tensor imaging as a predictor of locomotor function after experimental spinal cord injury and recovery. J Neurotrauma 31(15):1362–1373CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar