Requesting spinal MRIs effectively from primary care referrals
To define if MRI scans can accurately be requested based on information provided in the primary care referral and, therefore, streamline the patient journey.
Summary of background data
The demand for outpatient spinal appointments significantly exceeds our services’ ability to provide efficient, high-quality patient care. Currently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine is requested following first consultation.
During routine vetting of primary care referral letters, three consultant spinal surgeons recorded how likely they thought each patient would be to have an MRI scan. Following the first consultation with the spinal service, the notes of each patient were reviewed to see if an MRI was requested. We measured the positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity and specificity of ordering MRI scans based on primary care referral letters.
149 patients were included [101 females, 48 males, mean age 49 (16–87)]. There were 125 routine, 21 urgent, and 3 ‘urgent-suspected cancer’ referrals. The PPV of ordering MRIs before first consultation was 84%, NPV was 56% with the sensitivity and specificity being 82 and 59%, respectively. Ordering MRIs during initial vetting could shorten the patient journey with potential socioeconomic benefits.
MRI scans can be effectively ordered based on the information provided by the primary care referral letter. Requesting MRI scans early in the patient journey can save considerable time, improve care, and deliver cost savings.
KeywordsOutpatient department Magnetic resonance imaging Quality improvement Patient care General practitioners Quality of patient care Sensitivity Specificity Streamline patient journey
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest. No funds were received in support of this work. No relevant financial activities outside the submitted work.
- 1.(2016) The modern outpatient: a collaborative approach 2017–2020. http://www.gov.scot/Resource/0051/00510930.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2017
- 5.McEvoy C, Wiles L, Bernhardsson S et al (2015) Triage for patients with spinal complaints: a systematic review of the literature. Physiother Res Int 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.1639
- 6.(2010) NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde: pathway for the physiotherapy management of low back pain. http://www.generalpracticemedicine.org/Pathway%20Document%202%201%20.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2017
- 10.(2013) National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Low back pain and sciatica in over 16s. NICE guideline (NG 59). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng59. Accessed 2 May 2017
- 14.(2015) National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Suspected cancer: recognition and referral. NICE guideline (NG 12). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng12. Accessed 2 May 2017
- 19.Jamaludin A, Lootus M, Kadir T, Zisserman A, Urban J, Battié MC, Fairbank J, McCall I (2017) Genodisc Consortium. ISSLS PRIZE IN BIOENGINEERING SCIENCE 2017: automation of reading of radiological features from magnetic resonance images (MRIs) of the lumbar spine without human intervention is comparable with an expert radiologist. Eur Spine J 26(5):1374–1383CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar