European Spine Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 847–850 | Cite as

Incidence of unexpected positive histology in kyphoplasty

  • Stephan Nowak
  • Jonas Müller
  • Henry W. S. Schroeder
  • Jan Uwe Müller
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty have become one of the most frequent surgical procedures in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures. Often, the cause of compression fractures is lowered bone mineral density as in osteoporosis. In the differential workup, also pathologic vertebral compression fractures need to be ruled out. Importantly, imaging techniques alone cannot safely differentiate between invasive lymphatic and osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Our goal was to identify the degree of unexpected positive histology in kyphoplasty for presumed osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed all kyphoplasties performed between 2007 and 2015 at our institution. The data were acquired by reviewing our medical documentation system. The data analysis was done using Microsoft Excel. The statistical analysis was done using the Chi-squared test.

Results

We performed 130 kyphoplasties/vertebroplasties. A biopsy was taken in 97 (74.6%) cases. In 10 (10.3%) cases, the histology revealed a pathological fracture. From these patients, only in 3 (30%) cases, a positive histology was not expected. Meaning that there was no history of cancer and the radiological findings presumed an osteoporotic fracture.

Conclusions

Therefore, we could demonstrate that the incidence of unexpected positive histology in vertebral compression fracture treated with kyphoplasty is significant (3.1%). As a conclusion, if a kyphoplasty is performed due to assumed osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture, a biopsy should be taken to safely rule out a pathological fracture caused by lymphatic bony invasion.

Keywords

Kyphoplasty Lymphoma Vertebral fracture Osteoporosis 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Abrego G, García J, Gilbert B, Forseen S, Toscano M (2016) ALK positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma of the thoracic spine. J Radiol Case Rep 10(9):1–12PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhat AR, Kirmani AR, Wani MA, Bhat MH (2016) Incidence, histopathology, and surgical outcome of tumors of spinal cord, nerve roots, meninges, and vertebral column—data based on single institutional (Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences) experience. J Neurosci Rural Pract 7(3):381–391CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Godersky JC, Smoker WRK, Knutzon R (1987) Use of MRI in the evaluation of metastatic spinal disease. Neurosurgery 21:676–680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Keating MJ, O’Brien S, Lerner S, Koller C, Beran M, Robertson LE et al (1998) Long-term follow-up of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) receiving fludarabine regimens as initial therapy. Blood 92:1165–1171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lips P (1997) Epidemiology and predictors of fractures associated with osteoporosis. Am J Med 103(2A):3S–8SCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Taylor RS, Taylor RJ, Fritzell P (2006) Balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty for vertebral compression fractures: a comparative systematic review of efficacy and safety. Spine 31(23):2747–2755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang L, Wang Q, Wang L, Shen J, Zhang Q, Sun C (2017) Bone cement distribution in the vertebral body affects chances of recompression after percutaneous vertebroplasty treatment in elderly patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Clin Interv Aging 12:431–436CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hansen EJ, Simony A, Carreon L, Andersen MO (2016) Rate of unsuspected malignancy in patients with vertebral compression fracture undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41(6):549–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deb P, Malik A, Sinha KK (2011) Intraoperative scrape cytology: adult granulosa cell tumor of ovary. J Cytol 28(4):207–209CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Naresh-Babu J, Neelima G, Reshma-Begum SK (2014) Increasing the specimen adequacy of transpedicular vertebral body biopsies. Role of intraoperative scrape cytology. Spine J 14:2320–2325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Inuganti RV, Mettu RR, Surath HV, Surath A (2016) The role of intraoperative scrape cytology in vertebroplasty. Cytojournal 13:11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurosurgery, Klinik und Poliklinik für NeurochirurgieUniversitätsmedizin GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany

Personalised recommendations