Advertisement

European Spine Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 319–326 | Cite as

Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement in adolescent patients with severe spinal deformities: a retrospective study comparing drill guide template with free-hand technique

  • Yue Pan
  • G. H. Lü
  • Lei Kuang
  • Bing Wang
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Patients with severe spinal deformities often have small pedicle diameters, and pedicle dimensions vary between segments and individuals. Free-hand pedicle screw placement can be inaccurate. Individualized drill guide templates may be used, but the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in severe scoliosis remains unknown. The accuracy of drill guide templates and free-hand technique for the treatment of adolescent patients with severe idiopathic scoliosis are compared in this study.

Methods

This study included 37 adolescent patients (mean age 16.4 ± 1.3 years) with severe idiopathic scoliosis treated surgically at a single spine center between January 2014 and June 2017. Spinal deformities were corrected using posterior pedicle screw fixation. Patients in group I were treated with rapid prototype drill guide template technique (20 patients; 396 screws) and patients in group II were treated with free-hand technique (17 patients; 312 screws). Outcomes that included operative time, correction rate, and the incidence and distribution of screw misplacement were evaluated.

Results

Operative time in group I was 283 ± 22.7 min compared to 285 ± 25.8 min in group II (p = 0.89). The scoliosis correction rate was 55.0% in group I and 52.9% in group II (p = 0.33). Based on both axial and sagittal reconstruction images, the accuracy rate of pedicle screw placement was 96.7% in group I and 86.9% in group II (p = 0.000).

Conclusion

The drill guide template technique has potential to offer more accurate and thus safer placement of pedicle screws than free-hand technique in the treatment of severe scoliosis in adolescents.

Keywords

Pedicle screws Severe spinal deformities Drill guide template 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Nothing to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Sponseller PD, Takenaga RK, Newton P, Boachie O (2008) The use of traction in the treatment of severe spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(21):2305–2309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ et al (1995) Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 20:1399–1405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Di Silvestre M, Parisini P, Lolli F et al (2007) Complications of thoracic pedicle screws in scoliosis treatment. Spine 32:1655–1661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sedory DM, Crawford JJ, Topp RF (2011) The reliability of the ball-tipped probe for detecting pedicle screw tract violations prior to instrumenting the thoracic and lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(6):E447–E453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Parker SL, McGirt MJ, Farber SH, Amin AG, Rick AM, Suk I, Bydon A, Sciubba DM, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, Witham TF (2011) Accuracy of free-hand pedicle screws in the thoracic and lumbar spine: analysis of 6816 consecutive screws. Neurosurgery 68(1):170–178 (discussion 178) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Choi WW, Green BA, Levi AD (2000) Computer assisted fluoroscopic targeting system for pedicle screw insertion. Neurosurgery 47:872–878CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, O’Brien MF et al (2005) Accuracy and efficacy of thoracic pedicle screws in curve more than 90. Spine 20:222–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lu S, Xu YQ, Zhang YZ, Li YB, Xie L, Shi JH et al (2009) A novel computer-assisted drill guide template for lumbar pedicle screw placement: a cadaveric and clinical study. Int J Med Robot 5(2):184–191CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lu S, Zhang YZ, Wang Z, Shi JH, Chen YB, Xu XM, Xu YQ (2012) Accuracy and efficacy of thoracic pedicle screws in scoliosis with patient-specific drill template. Med Biol Eng Comput 50(7):751–758CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lu S, Xu YQ, Lu WW et al (2009) A novel patient-specific navigational template for cervical pedicle screw placement. Spine 34:E959–E964CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Foley KT, Simon DA, Rampersaud YR (2001) Virtual fluoroscopy: computer-assisted fluoroscopic navigation. Spine 26:347–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zausinger S, Scheder B, Uhl E, Heigl T, Morhard D, Tonn JC (2009) Intraoperative computed tomography with integrated navigation system in spinal stabilizations. Spine 34:2919–2926CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Birnbaum K, Schkommodau E, Decker N, Prescher A, Klapper U, Radermacher K (2001) Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery with individual templates and comparison to conventional operation method. Spine 26(4):365–369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Radermacher K, Portheine F, Anton M, Zimolong A, Kaspers G, Rau G, Staudte HW (1998) Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery with image based individual templates. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:28–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goffin J, Van Brussel K, Martens K, Vander Sloten J, Van Aude-kercke R, Smet MH (2001) Three-dimensional computed tomography-based, personalized drill guide for posterior cervical stabilization at C1–C2. Spine 26(12):1343–1347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ma T, Xu YQ, Cheng YB, Jiang MY, Xu XM, Xie L, Lu S (2012) A novel computer-assisted drill guide template for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a cadaveric study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(1):65–72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lamartina C, Cecchinato R, Fekete Z et al (2015) Pedicle screw placement accuracy in thoracic and lumbar spinal surgery with a patient-matched targeting guide: a cadaveric study. Eur Spine J (Germany) 24(Suppl 7):p937–p941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Farshad M, Betz M, Farshad-Amacker NA et al (2017) Accuracy of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a randomized cadaveric study. Eur Spine J (Germany) 26(3):p738–p749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Merc M, Drstvensek I (2013) A multi-level rapid prototyping drill guide template reduces the perforation risk of pedicle screw placement in the lumbar and sacral spine. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133:893–899CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Putzier M, Strube P, Cecchinato R et al (2017) A new navigational tool for pedicle screw placement in patients with severe scoliosis: a pilot study to prove feasibility, accuracy, and identify operative challenges. Clin Spine Surg 30(4):E430–E439PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Azimifar F, Hassani K, Saveh AH et al (2017) A low invasiveness patient’s specific template for spine surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng H (England) 231(2):143–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Cho YS, Riew KD (2004) Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe? Spine 29(3):333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE (1990) Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15:11–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smorgick Y, Millgram MA, Anekstein Y et al (2005) Accuracy and safety of thoracic pedicle screw placement in spinal deformities. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:522–526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Amiot LP, Lang K, Putzier M, Zippel H, Labelle H (2000) Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Spine 25(5):606CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xu R, Ebraheim NA, Ou Y, Yeasting RA (1998) Anatomic considerations of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine. Roy-Camille technique versus open-lamina technique. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(9):1065–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Modi Hitesh, Suh Seung Woo, Song Hae-Ryong, Yang Jae-Hyuk (2009) Accuracy of thoracic pedicle screw placement in scoliosis using the ideal pedicle entry point during the freehand technique. Int Orthop 33:469–475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Belmont PJ Jr, Klemme WR, Dhawan A, Polly DW Jr (2001) In vivo accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2340–2346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liljenqvist UR, Halm HF, Link TM (1997) Pedicle screw instrumentation of the thoracic spine in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22:2239–2245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Balderston RA, Allardyce TJ, Garfin SR, Dolinskas C et al (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: an anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77:1200–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gelalis ID, Paschos NK, Pakos EE, Politis AN, Arnaoutoglou CM, Karageorgos AC et al (2012) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J 21:247–255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Youkilis AS, Quint DJ, McGillicuddy JE, Papadopoulos SM (2001) Stereotactic navigation for placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Neurosurgery 48:771–779PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Oertel MF, Hobart J, Stein M, Schreiber V, Scharbrodt W (2011) Clinical and methodological precision of spinal navigation assisted by 3D intraoperative O-arm radiographic imaging. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 14:532–536CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Costa F, Cardia A, Ortolina A, Fabio G, Zerbi A, Fornari M (2011) Spinal navigation: standard preoperative versus intraoperative computed tomography data set acquisition for computer-guidance system: radiological and clinical study in 100 consecutive patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:2094–2098CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Drstvensek I, Ihan Hren N, Strojnik T, Brajlih T, Valentan B, Pogacar V, Zupancic Hartner T (2008) Applications of rapid prototyping in cranio-maxilofacial surgery procedures. Int J Biol Biomed Eng 1:29–38Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dvorak M, MacDonald S, Gurr KR et al (1993) An anatomic, radiographic, and biomechanical assessment of extrapedicular screw fixation in the thoracic spine. Spine 18:1689–1694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yuksel KZ, Adams MS, Chamberlain RH et al (2007) Pullout resistance of thoracic extrapedicular screws used as a salvage procedure. Spine J 7:286–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    White KK, Oka R, Mahar AT et al (2006) Pullout strength of thoracic pedicle screw instrumentation: comparison of the transpedicular and extrapedicular techniques. Spine 31:E355–E358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Husted DS, Yue JJ, Fairchild TA et al (2003) An extrapedicular approach to the placement of screws in the thoracic spine: an anatomic and radiographic assessment. Spine 28:2324–2330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Spine SurgeryThe Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations