European Spine Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 340–349 | Cite as

Zonal differences in risk and pattern of pedicle screw perforations in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): a computerized tomography (CT) review of 1986 screws

Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the zonal differences in risk and pattern of pedicle screw perforations in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients.

Methods

The scoliosis curves were divided into eight zones. CT scans were used to assess perforations: Grade 0, Grade 1(< 2 mm), Grade 2(2–4 mm) and Grade 3(> 4 mm). Anterior perforations were classified into Grade 0, Grade 1(< 4 mm), Grade 2(4–6 mm) and Grade 3(> 6 mm). Grade 2 and 3 (except lateral grade 2 and 3 perforation over thoracic vertebrae) were considered as ‘critical perforations’.

Results

1986 screws in 137 patients were analyzed. The overall perforation rate was 8.4% after exclusion of the lateral perforation. The highest medial perforation rate was at the transitional proximal thoracic (PT)/main thoracic (MT) zone (6.9%), followed by concave lumbar (6.7%) and convex main thoracic (MT) zone (6.1%). The overall critical medial perforation rate was 0.9%. 33.3% occurred at convex MT and 22.2% occurred at transitional PT/MT zone. There were 39 anterior perforations (overall perforation rate of 2.0%). 43.6% occurred at transitional PT/MT zone, whereas 23.1% occurred at concave PT zone. The overall critical anterior perforation rate was 0.6%. 5/12 (41.7%) critical perforations occurred at concave PT zone, whereas four perforations occurred at the transitional PT/MT zone. There were only two symptomatic left medial grade 2 perforations (0.1%) resulting radiculopathy, occurring at the transitional main thoracic (MT)/Lumbar (L) zone.

Conclusion

Overall pedicle perforation rate was 8.4%. Highest rate of critical medial perforation was at the convex MT zone and the transitional PT/MT zone, whereas highest rate of critical anterior perforation was at the concave PT zone and the transitional PT/MT zone. The rate of symptomatic perforations was 0.1%.

Keywords

Pedicle screw Perforation Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Computed tomography 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declared that they have no potential conflict of interest.

Funding

No funding received for this work.

References

  1. 1.
    Liljenqvist UR, Allkemper T, Hackenberg L et al (2002) Analysis of vertebral morphology in idiopathic scoliosis with use of magnetic resonance imaging and multiplanar reconstruction. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84:359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    O’Brien MF, Lenke LG, Mardjetko S et al (2000) Pedicle morphology in thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: is pedicle fixation an anatomically viable technique? Spine 25:2285–2293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu J, Shen J, Zhang J et al (2012) The position of the aorta relative to the spine for pedicle screw placement in the correction of idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 25:E103–E107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sucato DJ, Duchene C (2003) The position of the aorta relative to the spine: a comparison of patients with and without idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85:1461–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sarwahi V, Sugarman EP, Wollowick AL et al (2014) Prevalence, distribution and surgical relevance of abnormal pedicles in spines with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis vs. no deformity. A CT based study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 96:e92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Czerwein J, Sarwahi V, Friend L et al (2007) A new CT cased classification of pedicles in spinal deformity. Spine J 7:115S–116SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wollowick A, Sugarman E, Nirenstein L et al (2010) Incidence, distribution and surgical relevance of abnormal pedicles in normal and deformed spines: a CT based study of 6256 pedicles. Spine J 10:S3–S4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sarlak AY, Buluc L, Sarisoy HT et al (2008) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis of screw placement relative to structures at risk. Eur Spine J 17:657–662CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jiang H, Qiu X, Wang W et al (2012) The position of the aorta changes with altered body position in single thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine 37:E1054–E1061CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jian J, Qian B, Qiu Y et al (2016) The potential risk of the left subclavian artery injury from excessively long thoracic pedicle screws placed in the proximal thoracic regions of Lenke type 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients and normal teenagers: an anatomical study. Eur Spine J 25:3282–3287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE (1990) Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15:11–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rao G, Brodke DS, Rondina M et al (2002) Comparison of computerized tomography and direct visualization in thoracic pedicle screw placement. J Neurosurg 97:223–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Halm H, Niemeyer T, Link T et al (2000) Segmental pedicle screw instrumentation in idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 9:191–197CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lenke LG, Kuklo TR, Ondra S et al (2008) Rationale behind the current state-of-the-art treatment of scoliosis (in the pedicle screw era). Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:1051–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hamill CL, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH et al (1996) The use of pedicle screw fixation to improve correction in the lumbar spine of patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Is it warranted? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:1241–1249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barr SJ, Schuette AM, Emans JB (1997) Lumbar pedicle screws versus hooks: results in double major curves in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 22:1369–1379CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee SM, Suk SI, Chung ER (2004) Direct vertebral rotation: a new technique of three dimensional deformity correction with segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 29:343–349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lowenstein JE, Matsumoto H, Vitale MG et al (2007) Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw construct. Spine 32:448–452CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hamilton DK, Smith JS, Sansur CA et al (2011) Rates of new neurological deficit associated with spine surgery based on 108,419 procedures: a report of the scoliosis research society morbidity and mortality committee. Spine 36:1218–1228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Suk SI, Kim WJ, Lee SM et al (2001) Thoracic pedicle screw fixation in spinal deformities: are they really safe? Spine 26:2049–2057CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Di Silvestre M, Parisini P, Lolli F et al (2007) Complications of thoracic pedicle screws in scoliosis treatment. Spine 32:1655–1661CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Suk SI, Lee SM, Chung ER et al (2005) Selective thoracic fusion with segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: more than 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:1602–1609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Samdani AF, Ranade A, Sciubba DM et al (2010) Accuracy of free-hand placement of thoracic pedicle screws in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: how much of a difference does surgeon experience make? Eur Spine J 19:91–95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH et al (2004) Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe? Spine 29:333–342 (discussion 42) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smorgick Y, Millgram MA, Anekstein Y et al (2005) Accuracy and safety of thoracic pedicle screw placement in spinal deformities. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:522–526CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lehman RA Jr, Lenke LG, Keeler KA et al (2007) Computed tomography evaluation of pedicle screws placed in the pediatric deformed spine over an 8-year period. Spine 32:2679–2684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Ramesh P et al (2007) Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine 32:E56–E64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Li G, Lv G, Passias P et al (2010) Complications associated with thoracic pedicle screws in spinal deformity. Eur Spine J 19:1576–1584CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Etemadifar M, Jamalaldini M (2017) Evaluating accuracy of free-hand pedicle screw insertion in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis using post-operative multi-slice computed tomography scan. Adv Biomed Res 6:19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kwan MK, Chiu CK, Gani SMA et al (2017) Accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis patients. A review of 2020 screws using computed tomography assessment. Spine 42:326–335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hicks JM, Singla A, Shen FH et al (2010) Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review. Spine 35:E465–E470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dede O, Ward WT, Bosch P et al (2014) Using the freehand pedicle screw placement technique in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis surgery. What is the incidence of neurological symptoms secondary to misplaced screws? Spine 39:286–290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Samdani AF, Belin EJ, Bennett JT et al (2013) Unplanned return to the operating room in patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Are we doing better with pedicle screws? Spine 38:1842–1847CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mac-Thiong J, Parent S, Poitras B et al (2013) Neurological outcome and management of pedicle screws misplaced totally within the spinal canal. Spine 38:229–237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wagner MR, Flores JB, Sanpera I et al (2011) Aortic abutment after direct vertebral rotation, Plowing of pedicle screws. Spine 36:243–247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sariyilmaz K, Ozkunt O, Sungur M et al (2017) Esophageal perforation caused by a posterior pedicle screw: a case report. J Pediatr Orthop 37(2):98–101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Liljenqvist UR, Link TM, Halm HFH (2000) Morphometric analysis of thoracic and lumbar vertebrae in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 25:1247–1253CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Davis CM, Grant CA, Pearcy MJ et al (2017) Is there asymmetry between the concave and convex pedicles in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A CT investigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:884–893CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Watanabe K, Lenke LG, Matsumoto M et al (2010) A novel pedicle channel classification describing osseous anatomy. How many thoracic scoliosis pedicles have cancellous channels? Spine 35:1836–1842CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chen L, Xu L, Qiu Y et al (2015) The risk of aorta impingement from pedicle screw may increase due to aorta movement during posterior instrumentation in Lenke 5C curve: a computed tomography study. Eur Spine J 24:1481–1489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Heidenreich M, Baghdadi YMK, McIntosh AL et al (2015) At what levels are freehand pedicle screws more frequently malpositioned in children? Spine Deformity 3:332–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lee CK, Chan CYW, Gani SMA et al (2017) Accuracy of cannulated pedicle screw versus conventional pedicle screw for extra-pedicular screw placement in dysplastic pedicles without cancellous channel in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a computerised tomography (CT) analysis. Eur Spine J. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5266-5 (epub ahead of print) Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Takeshita K, Maruyama T, Chikuda H et al (2009) Diameter, length and direction of pedicle screws for scoliotic spine: analysis by multiplanar reconstruction of computed tomography. Spine 34:798–803CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of MedicineNOCERAL, University MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations