European Spine Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 2, pp 358–369 | Cite as

Incidence and risk factors for postoperative shoulder imbalance in scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • ShengFei Zhang
  • Liang Zhang
  • XinMin Feng
  • HuiLin Yang
Original Article
  • 151 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to detect the incidence and risk factors for postoperative shoulder imbalance (PSI) in scoliosis.

Methods

A systematic online search was conducted to identify eligible studies. ES, OR and WMD with 95% CI were used to assess the incidence and risk factors associated with PSI.

Results

Twenty-six studies were recruited. The pooled incidence of PSI was 25% (95% CI 20–31%). The incidence in Lenke 1 AIS, Lenke 2 AIS, Lenke 5 AIS and mixed AIS was 20% (9–31%), 26% (15–37%), 31% (17–45%) and 27% (19–35%), respectively. Using RSH ≥10 mm as the criterion of PSI, we found that preoperative LC, postoperative RSH, correction rate of MTC at follow-up were primary risk factors for PSI at follow-up. In the analysis of using RSH ≥20 mm as the criterion of PSI, our results showed that Risser sign, postoperative RSH, correction rate of PTC at follow-up, and LC at follow-up were contributing to PSI. Besides, scoliosis patients with PSI were more likely to suffer from adding-on.

Conclusions

The pooled incidence of PSI in scoliosis was 25%. Risser sign, preoperative LC, postoperative RSH, correction rate of PTC at follow-up, correction rate of MTC at follow-up, and LC at follow-up were risk factors for PSI in patients with scoliosis. Adding-on might be a compensatory mechanism for PSI. It is recommended that (1) sufficient correction of PTC and moderate correction of MTC and LC in the operation should be performed; (2) PSI should be prevented not only for the patients’ postoperative appearance, but also for preventing the adding-on phenomenon.

Keywords

Scoliosis Postoperative shoulder imbalance Risk factors Meta-analysis 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Yang M, Li C, Li Y, Zhao Y, Wei X, Zhang G, Fan J, Ni H, Chen Z, Bai Y, Li M (2015) Application of 3D rapid prototyping technology in posterior corrective surgery for Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Medicine 94(8):e582. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000000582 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu Z, Hu ZS, Qiu Y, Zhang Z, Zhao ZH, Han X, Zhu ZZ (2017) Role of clavicle chest cage angle difference in predicting postoperative shoulder balance in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients after selective posterior fusion. Orthop Surg 9(1):86–90. doi: 10.1111/os.12305 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee CS, Hwang CJ, Lim EJ, Lee DH, Cho JH (2016) A retrospective study to reveal factors associated with postoperative shoulder imbalance in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with double thoracic curve. J Neurosurg Pediatr 25(6):744–752. doi: 10.3171/2016.6.peds16162 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Suk SI, Kim WJ, Lee CS, Lee SM, Kim JH, Chung ER, Lee JH (2000) Indications of proximal thoracic curve fusion in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: recognition and treatment of double thoracic curve pattern in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with segmental instrumentation. Spine 25(18):2342–2349CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Namikawa T, Matsumura A, Kato M, Hayashi K, Nakamura H (2015) Radiological assessment of shoulder balance following posterior spinal fusion for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 10(Suppl 2):S18. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-10-s2-s18 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yagi M, Takemitsu M, Machida M (2013) Chest cage angle difference and rotation of main thoracic curve are independent risk factors of postoperative shoulder imbalance in surgically treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 38(19):E1209–E1215. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829e0309 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Han X, Liu Z, Qiu Y, Sha S, Yan H, Jin M, Zhu Z (2016) Clavicle chest cage angle difference: is it a radiographic and clinical predictor of postoperative shoulder imbalance in Lenke I adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine 41(17):1346–1354. doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001521 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cao K, Watanabe K, Hosogane N, Toyama Y, Yonezawa I, Machida M, Yagi M, Kaneko S, Kawakami N, Tsuji T, Matsumoto M (2014) Association of postoperative shoulder balance with adding-on in Lenke Type II adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 39(12):E705–E712. doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000000325 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yagi M, Takemitsu M, Machida M (2013) Clavicle chest cage angle difference (CCAD): a novel predictor of postoperative shoulder imbalance in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 38(12):E705–E712. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828f0bcd CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liljenqvist U, Halm H, Bullmann V (2013) Spontaneous lumbar curve correction in selective anterior instrumentation and fusion of idiopathic thoracic scoliosis of Lenke type C. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 2):S138–S148. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2299-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lee CS, Chung SS, Shin SK, Park YS, Park SJ, Kang KC (2011) Changes of upper thoracic curve and shoulder balance in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by anterior selective thoracic fusion using VATS. J Spinal Disord Tech 24(7):462–468. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318204d553 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li M, Gu S, Ni J, Fang X, Zhu X, Zhang Z (2009) Shoulder balance after surgery in patients with Lenke Type 2 scoliosis corrected with the segmental pedicle screw technique. J Neurosurg Spine 10(3):214–219. doi: 10.3171/2008.11.spine08524 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smyrnis PN, Sekouris N, Papadopoulos G (2009) Surgical assessment of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 18(4):522–530. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0902-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Min K, Hahn F, Ziebarth K (2007) Short anterior correction of the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve in King 1 idiopathic scoliosis: the behaviour of the instrumented and non-instrumented curves and the trunk balance. Eur Spine J 16(1):65–72. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0075-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang X, Lv G, Wang B, Li J, Lu C, Kang Y, Li Y (2014) Risk factors of postoperative shoulder imbalance after major thoracic curve correction in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Chin J Spine Spinal Cord 24(6):487–492Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sun X, Chen Z, Yang W, Li M (2015) Radiographic assessment of shoulder balance in Lenke type I adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following posterior all pedicle screws instrumentation and fusion. Orthop J China 23(9):779–783Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stang A (2010) Critical evaluation of the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 25(9):603–605. doi: 10.1007/s10654-010-9491-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bjerke BT, Cheung ZB, Shifflett GD, Iyer S, Derman PB, Cunningham ME (2015) Do current recommendations for upper instrumented vertebra predict shoulder imbalance? An attempted validation of level selection for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. HSS J 11(3):216–222. doi: 10.1007/s11420-015-9451-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kwan MK, Chan CY (2016) Is there an optimal upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) tilt angle to prevent post-operative shoulder imbalance and neck tilt in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients? Eur Spine J 25(10):3065–3074. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4529-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Menon KV, Pillay HM, Anbuselvam M, Tahasildar N, Renjit Kumar J (2015) Post-operative shoulder imbalance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a study of clinical photographs. Scoliosis 10:31. doi: 10.1186/s13013-015-0055-6 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zang L, Fan N, Hai Y, Lu SB, Su QJ, Yang JC, Guan L, Kang N, Meng XL, Liu YZ (2016) Evaluation of the predictors of postoperative aggravation of shoulder imbalance in severe and rigid thoracic or thoracolumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 25(10):3353–3365. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4313-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kwan MK, Wong KA, Lee CK, Chan CY (2016) Is neck tilt and shoulder imbalance the same phenomenon? A prospective analysis of 89 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients (Lenke type 1 and 2). Eur Spine J 25(2):401–408. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4016-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jiang H, Qiu Y, Yu Y, Qiu XS, Jiang J, Liu Z, Wang WJ (2013) Analysis of factors associated with postoperative shoulder balance in Lenke Type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 51(4):344–348PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Elfiky TA, Samartzis D, Cheung WY, Wong YW, Luk KD, Cheung KM (2011) The proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: surgical strategy and management outcomes. Global Spine J 1(1):27–36. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296054 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Imrie M, Yaszay B, Bastrom TP, Wenger DR, Newton PO (2011) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: should 100% correction be the goal? J Pediatr Orthop 31(1 Suppl):S9–13. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181fd8a24 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Qiu GX, Wang YP, Yu B, Zhang JG, Shen JX, Weng XS, Li QY, Yang XY, Zhao LJ (2007) Analysis of the correction results of the adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with a proximal thoracic curve. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 45(8):520–524PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lee CK, Denis F, Winter RB, Lonstein JE (1993) Analysis of the upper thoracic curve in surgically treated idiopathic scoliosis. A new concept of the double thoracic curve pattern. Spine 18(12):1599–1608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jiang J, Qiu Y, Qian B, Wang B, Yu Y, Zhu Z (2015) Postoperative shoulder balances of Lenke 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with preoperative right-elevated shoulder after selective thoracic fusion. Chin J Bone Jt Surg 1:21–26Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jiang J, Qian B, Qiu Y, Wang B, Yu Y, Zhu Z (2017) Radiographic factors associated with shoulder imbalance immediately after operation in Lenke type 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients undergoing non-selective thoracic correction. Chin J Bone Jt 1:5–9Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, Graham EJ, Won DS, Sweet FA, Blanke KM, Bridwell KH (2002) Correlation of radiographic, clinical, and patient assessment of shoulder balance following fusion versus nonfusion of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 27(18):2013–2020CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Akel I, Pekmezci M, Hayran M, Genc Y, Kocak O, Derman O, Erdogan I, Yazici M (2008) Evaluation of shoulder balance in the normal adolescent population and its correlation with radiological parameters. Eur Spine J 17(3):348–354. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0546-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Arlet V, Marchesi D, Papin P, Aebi M (2000) Decompensation following scoliosis surgery: treatment by decreasing the correction of the main thoracic curve or “letting the spine go”. Eur Spine J 9(2):156–160CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yaszay B, Bastrom TP, Newton PO (2013) Should shoulder balance determine proximal fusion levels in patients with Lenke 5 curves? Spine Deform 1(6):447–451. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2013.08.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cil A, Pekmezci M, Yazici M, Alanay A, Acaroglu RE, Deviren V, Surat A (2005) The validity of Lenke criteria for defining structural proximal thoracic curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 30(22):2550–2555CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, Won DS, Graham EJ, Sweet FA, Betz RR, Bridwell KH, Blanke KM (2001) Spontaneous proximal thoracic curve correction after isolated fusion of the main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 26(18):1966–1975CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chang DG, Kim JH, Kim SS, Lim DJ, Ha KY, Suk SI (2014) How to improve shoulder balance in the surgical correction of double thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 39(23):E1359–E1367. doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000000578 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • ShengFei Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Liang Zhang
    • 2
  • XinMin Feng
    • 2
  • HuiLin Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OrthopedicsThe First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversitySuzhouPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of OrthopaedicsNorthern Jiangsu People’s HospitalYangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations