Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The influence of pregnancy on women with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

  • Review
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The study’s aim was to address three fundamental questions related to pregnancy and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and provide clinically applicable answers to spine specialists and general practitioners alike.

Methods

The authors performed a systematic literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify articles published between 1980 and 2015 that described pregnancy-related characteristics and outcomes in AIS patients. The search was conducted using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and evidence was classified according to the Oxford CEBM (Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine) appraisal tool.

Results

Twenty-two articles incorporating more than 3125 AIS patients were included. All studies concluded level 2b evidence or lower. Nulliparity rates were slightly higher among AIS patients, and more frequent infertility treatment was required. Pregnancy-related back pain was common, and while non-disabling, may have been more severe than in healthy women. Minor curve progression often occurred during pregnancy, though its permanence was questioned and significance unknown. Back pain and curve progression occurred independent of AIS treatment modality. With modern technology, anesthetic and obstetric complications in the perinatal period were not elevated in AIS mothers.

Conclusions

Women with AIS experience slightly elevated rates of nulliparity, infertility treatment, prepartum back pain, and peripartum curve progression. However, most women are able to have children and are not at increased risk of pregnancy-related complications. Higher quality evidence is needed to better define these relationships and allow more guided counseling and treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Negrini S, Aulisa AG, Aulisa L et al (2012) 2011 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis 7:3. doi:10.1186/1748-7161-7-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hresko MT (2013) Clinical practice. Idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. N Engl J Med 368:834–841. doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1209063

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Asher MA, Burton DC (2006) Asher_review. Scoliosis 1:2–10. doi:10.1186/1748-7161-1-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Stirling AJ, Howel D, Millner PA et al (1996) Late-onset idiopathic scoliosis in children 6–14 years old. A cross-sectional prevalence study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 78:1330–1336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dickson RA (1983) Scoliosis in the community. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 286:615–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gore DR, Passehl R, Sepic S, Dalton A (1981) Scoliosis screening: results of a community project. Pediatrics 67:196–200

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roach JW (1999) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Clin N Am 30:353–365 (vii–viii)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Konieczny MR, Senyurt H, Krauspe R (2013) Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop 7:3–9. doi:10.1007/s11832-012-0457-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JCY et al (2008) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet 371:1527–1537. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60658-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Raggio CL (2006) Sexual dimorphism in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Clin N Am 37:555–558. doi:10.1016/j.ocl.2006.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Watanabe K, Michikawa T, Yonezawa I et al (2017) Physical activities and lifestyle factors related to adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 99:284–294. doi:10.2106/JBJS.16.00459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 4:1–9. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Howick J, Chalmers I, Glasziou P et al (2011) The Oxford 2011 levels of evidence. Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653. Accessed 27 June 2016

  14. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA et al (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328:1490. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schünemann HJ, Jaeschke R, Cook DJ et al (2006) An official ATS statement: grading the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in ATS guidelines and recommendations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 174:605–614. doi:10.1164/rccm.200602-197ST

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bauchat JR, McCarthy RJ, Koski TR, Wong CA (2015) Labor analgesia consumption and time to neuraxial catheter placement in women with a history of surgical correction for scoliosis: a case-matched study. Anesth Analg 121:981–987. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000000690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lebel DE, Sergienko R, Wiznitzer A et al (2012) Mode of delivery and other pregnancy outcomes of patients with documented scoliosis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25:639–641. doi:10.3109/14767058.2011.598587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldberg MS, Mayo NE, Poitras B et al (1994) The Ste-Justine adolescent idiopathic scoliosis cohort study. Part I: description of the study. Spine 19:1551–1561

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Falick-Michaeli T, Schroeder JE, Barzilay Y et al (2015) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and pregnancy: an unsolved paradigm. Glob Spine J 5:179–184. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1552987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cochran T, Nachemson A (1985) Long-term anatomic and functional changes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with the Milwaukee brace. Spine 10:127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lange JE, Steen H, Gunderson R, Brox JI (2011) Long-term results after Boston brace treatment in late-onset juvenile and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 6:18. doi:10.1186/1748-7161-6-18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Takayama K, Nakamura H, Matsuda H (2009) Quality of life in patients treated surgically for scoliosis: longer than 16-year follow-up. Spine 34:2179–2184. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181abf684

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith PS, Wilson RC, Robinson APC, Lyons GR (2003) Regional blockade for delivery in women with scoliosis or previous spinal surgery. Int J Obstet Anesth 12:17–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Betz RR, Bunnell WP, Lambrecht-Mulier E, MacEwen GD (1987) Scoliosis and pregnancy. J Bone Jt Surg Am 69:90–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ascani E, Bartolozzi P, Logroscino CA et al (1986) Natural history of untreated idiopathic scoliosis after skeletal maturity. Spine 11:784–789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL (2001) Childbearing, curve progression, and sexual function in women 22 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case–control study. Spine 26:1449–1456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Akazawa T, Minami S, Kotani T et al (2012) Health-related quality of life and low back pain of patients surgically treated for scoliosis after 21 years or more of follow-up. Spine 37:1899–1903. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31825a22c2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Orvomaa E, Hiilesmaa V, Poussa M et al (1997) Pregnancy and delivery in patients operated by the Harrington method for idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 6:304–307. doi:10.1007/BF01142675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kersten I, Lange AE, Haas JP et al (2014) Chronic diseases in pregnant women: prevalence and birth outcomes based on the SNiP-study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2014:14:1–14:75. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-14-75

    Google Scholar 

  30. To WW, Wong MW (1996) Kyphoscoliosis complicating pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 55:123–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Goldberg MS, Mayo NE, Levy AR et al (1998) Adverse reproductive outcomes among women exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation from diagnostic radiography for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Epidemiology 9:271–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lange J, Steen H, Brox J (2009) Long-term results after Boston brace treatment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis 4:17. doi:10.1186/1748-7161-4-17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bjerkreim I, Steen H, Brox JI (2007) Idiopathic scoliosis treated with Cotrel–Dubousset instrumentation: evaluation 10 years after surgery. Spine 32:2103–2110. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318145a54a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Daley MD, Rolbin SH, Hew EM et al (1990) Epidural anesthesia for obstetrics after spinal surgery. Reg Anesth 15:280–284

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Berman AT, Cohen DL, Schwentker EP (1982) The effects of pregnancy on idiopathic scoliosis. A preliminary report on eight cases and a review of the literature. Spine 7:76–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Blount WP, Mellencamp D (1980) The effect of pregnancy on idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 62:1083–1087

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hubbert CH (1985) Epidural anesthesia in patients with spinal fusion. Anesth Analg 64:843

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Crosby ET, Halpern SH (1989) Obstetric epidural anaesthesia in patients with Harrington instrumentation. Can J Anaesth 36:693–696. doi:10.1007/BF03005423

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Maruyama T (2008) Bracing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review of the literature of effective conservative treatment looking for end results 5 years after weaning. Disabil Rehabil 30:786–791. doi:10.1080/09638280801889782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Weinstein SL, Zavala DC, Ponseti IV (1981) Idiopathic scoliosis: long-term follow-up and prognosis in untreated patients. J Bone Jt Surg Am 63:702–712

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Freidel K, Petermann F, Reichel D et al (2002) Quality of life in women with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 27:E87–E91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Freidel K, Reichel D, Steiner A et al (2002) Idiopathic scoliosis and quality of life. Stud Health Technol Inform 88:24–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Payne WK, Ogilvie JW, Resnick MD et al (1997) Does scoliosis have a psychological impact and does gender make a difference? Spine 22:1380–1384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lim AS, Stewart K, Abramson MJ et al (2012) Asthma during pregnancy: the experiences, concerns and views of pregnant women with asthma. J Asthma 49:474–479. doi:10.3109/02770903.2012.678024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Weckesser A, Denny E (2013) Women living with epilepsy, experiences of pregnancy and reproductive health: a review of the literature. Seizure 22:91–98. doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2012.11.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hillier TA, Rizzo JH, Pedula KL et al (2003) Nulliparity and fracture risk in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 18:893–899. doi:10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.5.893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Opdahl S, Alsaker MDK, Janszky I et al (2011) Joint effects of nulliparity and other breast cancer risk factors. Br J Cancer 105:731–736. doi:10.1038/bjc.2011.286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Veldhuizen AG, Wever DJ, Webb PJ (2000) The aetiology of idiopathic scoliosis: biomechanical and neuromuscular factors. Eur Spine J 9:178–184. doi:10.1007/s005860000142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Schultz AB (1984) Biomechanical factors in the progression of idiopathic scoliosis. Ann Biomed Eng 12:621–630

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lombardi G, Akoume M-Y, Colombini A et al (2011) Biochemistry of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Adv Clin Chem 54:165–182

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang WJ, Yeung HY, Chu WC-W et al (2011) Top theories for the etiopathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 31:S14–S27. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181f73c12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Skaggs CD, Prather H, Gross G et al (2007) Back and pelvic pain in an underserved United States pregnant population: a preliminary descriptive survey. J Manip Physiol Ther 30:130–134. doi:10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Vleeming A (2007) Pregnancy related pelvic girdle pain and low back pain in an Iranian population. Spine 32:E100–E104. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000254123.26649.6e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Bettany-Saltikov J, Weiss H-R, Chockalingam N et al (2015) Surgical versus non-surgical interventions in people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010663.pub2

    Google Scholar 

  55. Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Jones L (2011) Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Taffel SM, Placek PJ, Liss T (1987) Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980–85 rise. Am J Public Health 77:955–959

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJK, Curtain SC (2015) Births: preliminary Data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep 64:1–19

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, T-4224 Medical Center North, Nashville, TN, 37232-2380, USA

    Michael C. Dewan, Nishit Mummareddy & Christopher Bonfield

Authors
  1. Michael C. Dewan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nishit Mummareddy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christopher Bonfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael C. Dewan.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

The study design consisted of a literature review of previously published data; no human participants were directly involved in any aspect of this study. Informed consent, therefore, was not applicable.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dewan, M.C., Mummareddy, N. & Bonfield, C. The influence of pregnancy on women with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 27, 253–263 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5203-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5203-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation