Analysis of complications and perioperative data after open or percutaneous dorsal instrumentation following traumatic spinal fracture of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a retrospective cohort study including 491 patients
The aim of the current study is to analyze perioperative data and complications of open vs. percutaneous dorsal instrumentation after dorsal stabilization in patients suffering from fractures of the thoracic or lumbar spine.
In the time period from 01/2007 to 06/2009, open surgical approach was used for dorsal stabilization. The percutaneous surgical approach was used from 05/2009 to 03/2014. In every time period, all types of fractures were treated only by open or by percutaneous approach, respectively, to avoid any selection bias. Retrospectively, epidemiological data, complications and perioperative data were documented and statistically analyzed.
A total of 491 patients met the inclusion criteria. Open surgery procedure was carried out on 169 patients, and percutaneous surgery procedure was carried out on 322 patients. Fracture level ranged from T1 to L5, and fractures were classified types A, B, and C. In 91.4% of all patients, no complication occured following dorsal stabilization after traumatic spine fracture during their hospital stay. However, 42 complications related to dorsal stabilization have been documented during the hospital stay. The complication rate was 14.8% if open surgical approach has been used and was significantly reduced to 5.3% using percutaneous surgical approach. Post-operative hospital stay was also reduced significantly using the percutaneous surgical approach.
According to the current study, percutaneous dorsal stabilization of the spine could also be safely used in trauma cases and is not restricted to degenerative spinal surgery.
KeywordsPercutaneous Open Spine Trauma Fracture Thoracic Lumbar Minimal invasive Complication Clavien-Dindo
Thanks to Friederike Töpfer for help with data acquisition and data management. Thanks to Johannes Gladitz for statistical expertise.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest and source of funding
The authors declare having no conflicts of interest towards the current study. There was no funding for this study.
- 3.Lee JK, Jang JW, Kim TW, Kim TS, Kim SH, Moon SJ (2013) Percutaneous short-segment pedicle screw placement without fusion in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: is it effective?: comparative study with open short-segment pedicle screw fixation with posterolateral fusion. Acta Neurochir 155:2305–2312. doi: 10.1007/s00701-013-1859-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Vanek P, Bradac O, Konopkova R, de Lacy P, Lacman J, Benes V (2014) Treatment of thoracolumbar trauma by short-segment percutaneous transpedicular screw instrumentation: prospective comparative study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 20:150–156. doi: 10.3171/2013.11.spine13479 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Verheyden AP, Holzl A, Ekkerlein H, Gercek E, Hauck S, Josten C, Kandziora F, Katscher S, Knop C, Lehmann W, Meffert R, Muller CW, Partenheimer A, Schinkel C, Schleicher P, Schnake KJ, Scholz M, Ulrich C (2011) Recommendations for the treatment of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine injuries. Unfallchirurg 114:9–16. doi: 10.1007/s00113-010-1934-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Siebenga J, Leferink VJ, Segers MJ, Elzinga MJ, Bakker FC, Haarman HJ, Rommens PM, ten Duis HJ, Patka P (2006) Treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures: a multicenter prospective randomized study of operative versus nonsurgical treatment. Spine 31:2881–2890. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000247804.91869.1e CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Wild MH, Glees M, Plieschnegger C, Wenda K (2007) Five-year follow-up examination after purely minimally invasive posterior stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures: a comparison of minimally invasive percutaneously and conventionally open treated patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:335–343. doi: 10.1007/s00402-006-0264-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Fitschen-Oestern S, Scheuerlein F, Weuster M, Klueter T, Menzdorf L, Varoga D, Kopetsch C, Mueller M, van der Horst A, Seekamp A, Behrendt P, Lippross S (2015) Reduction and retention of thoracolumbar fractures by minimally invasive stabilisation versus open posterior instrumentation. Injury 46(Suppl 4):S63–S70. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(15)30020-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Kumar A, Aujla R, Lee C (2015) The management of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a prospective study between conservative management, traditional open spinal surgery and minimally interventional spinal surgery. SpringerPlus 4:204. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-0960-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.Vaccaro AR, Oner C, Kepler CK, Dvorak M, Schnake K, Bellabarba C, Reinhold M, Aarabi B, Kandziora F, Chapman J, Shanmuganathan R, Fehlings M, Vialle L (2013) AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system: fracture description, neurological status, and key modifiers. Spine 38:2028–2037. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a8a381 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Vaccaro AR, Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Cumhur Oner F, Vialle LR, Kandziora F, Koerner JD, Kurd MF, Reinhold M, Schnake KJ, Chapman J, Aarabi B, Fehlings MG, Dvorak MF (2015) The surgical algorithm for the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system. Eur Spine J. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3982-2 Google Scholar