Health-care costs of conservative management of spine fractures in trauma patients
- 416 Downloads
Background and purpose
There is a lack of evidence on the broad health-care costs of treating spine trauma patients without neurological deficits conservatively. The aim of the present study was to estimate the primary and secondary health-care sector costs associated with conservative treatment of spine fractures as well as their determinants.
Patients were identified between 1999 and 2008 in the hospital’s administrative system based on relevant diagnostic codes. Inclusion criteria were: (1) spine fractures (C1–L5); (2) age >18; and (3) conservative treatment. Exclusion criteria were: (1) neurological involvement and (2) fractures secondary to osteoporosis/malignancy. Health-care utilization and costs were retrieved from national administrative databases covering the entire health-care sector.
201 cervical, 150 thoracic, and 140 lumbar fracture patients were included in the study. The total health cost was estimated at €18,919 (16,199; 21,756), €8571 (6062; 11,733), €5526 (3473; 7465) for cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions, respectively. Hospital admissions accounted for the vast majority of costs while primary health care accounted for less than 3 % and prescription medication for less than 2 %. The determinants of costs included fracture site (p < 0.001) and concomitant lower limb injuries (p = 0.009).
Spinal fractures, even mild ones, appear to incur substantial health-care utilization and costs. Health-care costs in conjunction with cervical fractures are more than two-fold of those affiliated with thoracic and lumbar fractures. Among the concomitant injuries, lower limb injuries exert a substantial influence over health-care costs.
KeywordsSpine fractures Conservative treatment Health-care utilization Health-care costs
This study was funded by the Danish Strategic Research Council as part of the CESpine project (Grant 2142-08-0017). We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Filipe Cortes Figueiredo, Lisbon Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Portugal and Stanislaus Argeny, Medical University of Vienna for data recruitment and organization during their research stay in Denmark. The authors express their appreciation to Linda Nygaard for help in editing.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.
- 3.Sørensen HT, Christensen T, Schlosser HK (2009) Use of medical databases in clinical epidemiology. Aarhus University Press, AarhusGoogle Scholar
- 7.Williamson OD, Epi GD, Gabbe BJ, Physio B, Cameron PA, Edwards ER, Richardson MD, Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcome Registry Project G (2009) Predictors of moderate or severe pain 6 months after orthopaedic injury: a prospective cohort study. J Orthop Trauma 23:139–144. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181962e29 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Von Korff M, Crane P, Lane M, Miglioretti DL, Simon G, Saunders K, Stang P, Brandenburg N, Kessler R (2005) Chronic spinal pain and physical–mental comorbidity in the United States: results from the national comorbidity survey replication. Pain 113:331–339. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Siebenga J, Segers MJ, Leferink VJ, Elzinga MJ, Bakker FC, Duis HJ, Rommens PM, Patka P (2007) Cost-effectiveness of the treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures: nonsurgical or surgical therapy? Indian J Orthop 41:332–336. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.36997 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Søgaard RSJ (2014) Health care costs attributable to hospital-diagnosed back pain: a Longitudinal Register-based Study of the Danish Population. J Health Econ Outcomes Res 1:266–275Google Scholar
- 20.Sørensen JSR (2013) Lifetime health care costs of the Danish population. J Health Econ Outcomes Res 1:163–173Google Scholar
- 25.Abudou M, Chen X, Kong X et al (2013) Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (England) 6:pCD005079Google Scholar