Advertisement

Comparative Clinical Pathology

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 1161–1165 | Cite as

Phylogenetic analysis of Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma ovis isolated from small ruminant based on MSP4 gene in western regions of Iran

  • Ali Yousefi
Original Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Anaplasma is a genus of rickettsiales bacteria which is considered as a member of the tick-borne diseases. Different species of this genus are transmitted by blood-sucking insects and arthropods and blood-contaminated instruments. The present study was carried out to determine the prevalence of Anaplasma ovis and Anaplasma marginale and to perform phylogenetic analysis in goat and sheep in East of Kermanshah provinces, western region of Iran. From April 2015 to May 2016, a total of 360 blood samples of small ruminants were collected. In the first step, DNA extraction and in the following nested PCR and the amplification of MSP4 gene were done and a total of 32.78% (118/360) of small ruminants were positive for Anaplasma species. The obtained nucleotide sequences were analyzed and phylogenetic tree was constructed. The similarity among the nucleotide sequences of A. ovis in this study was 100%, and for A. marginale, it showed 99% identity with the others. Statistical analysis by chi-square test did not show any significant relationship between the presence of Anaplasma species and statistical variables like age, tick infestation, sex, and location (p > 0.05). Therefore, further studies are required in different areas of Iran to ascertain our knowledge and to verify Anaplasma species isolates.

Keywords

Anaplasma marginale Anaplasma ovis Tick-borne Sheep Goat Kermanshah Iran 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mrs. Fatemeh Khademi, Mis. Fariba nuori, Mr. Abbas Yousefi, and Mr. Masoud Moradi for their help in the collection of samples.

Funding

This study was funded by the Science and Research Branch of Islamic Azad University, Tehran.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

References

  1. Ahmadi-Hamedani M, Khaki Z, Rahbari S, Kazemi B, Bandehpour M (2009) Molecular identification of anaplasmosis in goats using a new PCR-RFLP method. Iranian J Vet Res 10:367–372Google Scholar
  2. Dikmans G (1950) The transmission of anaplasmosis. Am J Vet Res 11:5–16Google Scholar
  3. Ewing SA (1981) Transmission of Anaplasma marginale by arthropods. In: Proceedings of the 7th National Anaplasmosis Conference. Mississippi State University, MS, USA, pp 395–423Google Scholar
  4. Foil LD (1989) Tabanids as vectors of disease agents. Parasitol Today 5:88–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hosseini-Vasoukolaei N, Oshaghi MA, Shayan P, Vatandoost H, Babamahmoudi F, Yaghoobi-Ershadi MR, Telmadarraiy Z, Mohtarami F (2014) Anaplasma infection in ticks, livestock and human in Ghaemshahr, Mazandaran Province, Iran. J Arthropod-Borne Dis 8:204–211PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Jalali SM, Khaki Z, Kazemi B, Bandehpour M, Rahbari S, Razi Jalali M, Yasini SP (2013) Molecular detection and identification of Anaplasma species in sheep from Ahvaz, Iran. Iranian J Vet Res 14:50–56Google Scholar
  7. Jore S, Viljugrein H, Hofshagen M, Brun-Hansen H, Kristoffersen AB, Nygård K, Ytrehus B (2011) Multi-source analysis reveals latitudinal and altitudinal shifts in range of Ixodes ricinus at its northern distribution limit. Parasit Vectors 4(1):84CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Medlock JM, Hansford KM, Bormane A, Derdakova M, Estrada-Peña A, George JC, Kazimirova M (2013) Driving forces for changes in geographical distribution of Ixodes ricinus ticks in Europe. Parasit Vectors 6(1):1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Murray PR, Rosenthal KS, Pfaller MA (2015) Medical microbiology, 8th edn. Elsevier Health Sciences, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  10. Noaman V, Bastani D (2016) Molecular study on infection rates of Anaplasma ovis and Anaplasma marginale in sheep and cattle in West-Azerbaijan province, Iran. Vet Res Forum 7(2):163–167PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Potgieter FT (1979) Epizootiology and control of anaplasmosis in South Africa. J S Afr Vet Assoc 504:367–372Google Scholar
  12. Razmi GR, Dastjerdi K, Hosseini H, Naghibi A, Barati F, Aslani MR (2006) An epidemiological study on Anaplasma infection in cattle, goat and sheep s in Mashhad suburb, Khorasan province, Iran. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1078:479–481CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Richey EJ, Palmer GH (1990) Bovine anaplasmosis. Compend Contin Educ Vet 12:1661–1668Google Scholar
  14. Rikihisa Y (1991) The tribe Ehrlichieae and ehrlichial diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev 4:286–308CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Robinson MT, Shaw SE, Morgan ER (2009) Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection in a multi-species deer community in the New Forest, England. Eur J Wildl Res 55:439–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Skerman KD, Hillard JJ (1966) A handbook for Studies of helminth parasites of ruminants. Iran Unit United Nations Development Programme/Special fund Handbook No.2. Near east Animal Health InstitutesGoogle Scholar
  17. Yousefi A, Rahbari S, Sadeghi-dehkordi Z, Bahonar A (2017a) Molecular detection of Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma ovis in goat and sheep in west highland pasture of Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 7(5):455–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yousefi A, Rahbari S, Sadeghi-dehkordi Z, Bahonar A (2017b) Molecular evidence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum: an emerging tick-borne pathogen in domesticated small ruminant of Iran; first report. Comp Clin Path 26(3):637–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Young Researchers and Elites Club, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations