Assessment of two abdominal mass closure methods using fishing line in rabbit model: clinical and pathological study
- 32 Downloads
The aim of the present study was to assess two methods of mass abdominal closure with the fishing line as an alternative suture material for abdominal wall closure. Eighteen healthy male white rabbits weighing approximately 2.5 kg were used in this study. Animals were separated into three groups: control group (CG) (n = 06), interrupted pattern suture experimental group (IEG) (n = 06), and continuous pattern suture experimental group (CEG) (n = 06). Incisional wounds (4 cm) were performed in the right flank of abdominal wall. In control group (CG), the abdominal muscles and peritoneum were sutured in one layer with simple interrupted pattern using PGA resorbable suture and the skin with commercial synthetic suture (nylon). Then, in experimental groups, closure of peritoneum, abdominal muscles, and skin was performed with one-layer pattern using translucent nylon fishing line. Daily scores were allocated for signs of infection, wound healing, and wound adhesion. A faster wound closure time was recorded in control group (9 days) compared to experimental groups (13 days). All study animals showed low adhesion scores that were very important in the muscular wall. Almost similar histopathology profiles were observed in all groups. This study has demonstrated that fishing line, as suture material, is suitable for mass abdominal closure in rabbit model.
KeywordsRabbit Mass abdominal closure Fishing line Wounds Histopathology
Compliance with ethical standards
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Alshehabat MA, Bani Ismail ZA, Hananeh WM, Awawdeh MS (2016) Effect of Sidr honey on healing of contaminated wounds in alloxan-induced diabetes mellitus in dogs Res Opin Anim Vet Sci 6Google Scholar
- Chellamani K, Veerasubramanian D, Balaji R (2013) Surgical sutures: an overview. J Acad Ind Res 1:778–782Google Scholar
- Hendrickson DA, Baird AN (2013) Turner and McIlwraith’s techniques in large animal surgery. John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
- Köm M (2013) Effect of hyaluronic acid/carboxymethylcellulose and flunixin meglumine combination on the prevention of postoperative intraabdominal adhesions: an experimental study in rabbits Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi 19Google Scholar
- Lemo N, Marignac G, Reyes-Gomez E, Lilin T, Crosaz O, Dohan Ehrenfest DM (2010) Cutaneous reepithelialization and wound contraction after skin biopsies in rabbits: a mathematical model for healing and remodelling index. Veterinarski arhiv 80:637–652Google Scholar
- Longombe AO, Ralaimiarison A, Lusi K (1993) The use of fishing Nylon for surgery in rural areas in north east Zaire. Trop Dr 23:179–180Google Scholar
- Moffatt C (2005) Identifying criteria for wound infection European Wound Management Association (EWMA) Position document: Identifying criteria for wound infection. MEP Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Quesenberry KE, Carpenter JW (2004) Ferrets, rabbits, and rodents: clinical medicine and surgery. Saunders Philadelphia,Google Scholar
- Rahman MM, Azad AS, Mawla MG, Alam MM, Rahman MM (2014) Outcome of abdominal wound closure following continuous and interrupted suture in elective laparotomy. Faridpur Med College J 8:73–76Google Scholar
- Turner AS, McIlwraith CW (1989) Techniques in large animal surgery. vol Ed. 2. Lea & FebigerGoogle Scholar